Back in February 2023, I wrote about a case from Jersey, where a severely autistic man injured by the MMR vaccine was being forced to take the Covid vaccine against the will of his parents. He was too severely autistic to make his own decision regarding the vaccine. The care home where he was living had denied him certain activities and essentially kept him in isolation from the other residents because he was not vaccinated.
Amother has launched a legal battle to stop the state from spiking her Down’s syndrome son’s drinks with sedatives so he can be jabbed with the Covid vaccine, The Telegraph can reveal.
Cups of tea and glasses of orange juice have been secretly laced with sedatives to subdue the man, in his thirties, so he can be given the vaccine and booster jabs.
I don’t have words for how utterly disgusting and repulsive this is. The people doing this are either psychopaths, or so sick in the head off the high of vaccinationism that they cannot even comprehend moral values any more.
Despite all the side effects of the covid vaccine, they are still pushing the ‘benefits outweigh the risks’ narrative as a justification to push the vaccine.
Here is a description of how the forced sedation was carried out from the above article.
As a “thank you” for having a mug of breakfast tea and a glass of orange juice brought into his room, Adam invariably hugged the staff he trusts so implicitly at his care home.
Unbeknown to him, on five separate occasions over the last 16 months those drinks were laced with a “covert anxiolytic medication” – a powerful sedative. Twice he became groggy before eventually succumbing to a deep sleep.
Each time, a team of senior carers, a nurse and the home’s manager stood quietly outside the room awaiting the nod to enter. One of them was armed with a syringe – kept well hidden due to Adam’s needle phobia – loaded with the Covid vaccine.
When the sedatives worked, Adam’s sleeve was quickly rolled up, the antiseptic wipe swiped over his upper arm and the needle inserted deep into his muscle as the plunger was pressed emptying the syringe barrel of its viscous contents. One carer made copious notes in readiness for a report which would be sent to the Court of Protection explaining how the procedure had gone.
The article further states that when Adam was given information relating to the vaccine, he said no to the vaccine.
I attended the conference ‘The Left Case Against the World Economic Forum’ on the 25th March in London. While I am not going to do an expansive write-up on the conference, I was drawn to respond to a comment made by Dr. Clare Craig in the Q&A portion of the panel regarding paediatric vaccines, as I have some quite significant issues with it.
The Context
Dr. Clare Craig gave a talk on the benefits and risks of artificial intelligence in healthcare (I’m not going to address that topic, transcript here for those that have an interest). An audience member (not me) asked her a question in the Q&A panel regarding traditional vaccines, stating that he read ‘Dissolving Illusions’ and that vaccines don’t have the effectiveness record that is claimed. Craig’s response to this question was that, paraphrasing, she has deliberately not got into the debate around other vaccines because we need to win people over on the issue of the Covid ‘vaccines’ first. Unfortunately there is no transcript/video of the q & a session available, so I am using memory and my instinct of what was said at the time and what went through my mind, after she said this. I did make notes on the day and the day after of what points I wanted to make in response, so hopefully this should be accurate.
I have several issues with this statement which I will outline below.
Loyalty to Truth
The first issue I have with this is the idea of loyalty to truth. The implications of this comment seem to be that we should put the question of truth of paediatric vaccine effectiveness to one side in order to prioritise the strategy of winning people over to the dangers of the covid jab. Let’s leave aside the question of whether this is a good strategy for a moment. If someone genuinely believes that paediatric vaccines do more good than harm, that is an honest position, if false (many people honestly believe this because of the relentless vaccine propaganda, though of course their unwillingness to question that propaganda is open to criticism). But to state that we should stay away from the issue, even if we are willing to question the claims around traditional vaccines intellectually, seems to me a like a dishonest position.
Is This a Good Strategy?
I also question whether this will be an effective strategy to win people over. Firstly, to a large extent, the battle over the Covid ‘vaccine’ is won, if not explicitly, then implicitly. Why?
As of March 21, 2023, only 16.4% of Americans were current with their updated (bivalent) booster dose, CDC data shows.
This number is very important. It demonstrates that even people who bought into the Covid scam and willingly got ‘vaccinated’ are not taking the bivalent boosters, and only a small hard core of Covid fanatics are still lining up for more doses. This is the same in lots of different countries, with doses administered flatlining in countries like Israel.
The question that logically follows is: why? If it is so ‘safe and effective’ why aren’t people still taking it? Again, these are the people who believed the CDC and trusted them on Covid, but when the CDC tells them to get the latest booster, they aren’t doing it. Because implicitly, even if they cannot admit it to themselves, they are subconsciously aware that this is a dangerous product. Of course, some are aware, having suffered consequences directly or indirectly from the ‘vaccine’ and have linked their and/or their family and friends’ misfortunes to the shot.
This makes it the perfect time to push back, strategically, and fight to destroy the vaccine cult as a whole. Millions of minds have been opened by the Covid jab debacle – and they would be willing to consider arguments about vaccination as a whole. There are already lots more parents stating they won’t vaccinate, or that they are considering not vaccinating, or they regret vaccinating. There’s also a smaller number of people who were injured by paediatric vaccinations who are speaking out but unfortunately this number remains very small for now (of course, those who were killed or severely injured by paediatric vaccinations cannot speak out). Now of course, if we do this they will smear us as ‘antivaxxer cranks’ or whatever, but the reality is, they are going to do that anyway. Even the mildest Covid ‘vaccine’ critics are called antivax by the establishment, so in this regard, it’s irrelevant whether we’re actually antivax or not in their eyes.
The only strategic reason to not push back against the whole vaccine paradigm at this point is because one wants to save it. Some people critical of the mRNAs fall into this category, like Alex Berenson. I don’t know whether Dr. Craig ultimately wants to save it or not, as she didn’t explicitly answer that question. But not addressing paediatric vaccine harms has that effect.
The Harm of Paediatric Vaccination Injuries
Dr. Craig did not say that paediatric vaccination injuries are not real, in fact she engaged with someone in the audience whose sister had been injured by the Smallpox vaccine. She also mentioned the Pandemrix vaccine which was famously pulled for causing narcolepsy. So to be clear I am not accusing her of stating that paediatric vaccination injury cannot happen. The question from the audience member was more framed around the issue of vaccine effectiveness (such as vaccination not deserving credit for wiping out diseases) and not vaccine injury (such as the vaccines cause autism debate). This was the sort of point the questioner was trying to make:
As such, I understand that Dr. Craig did not frame her answer in reference to paediatric vaccination injuries, but nevertheless, the topic cannot be avoided. If we assume that paediatric vaccination injuries, including severe injury and death, are real, than avoiding this topic helps to allow the injury to continue, regardless of intent. The reality of the autism epidemic is continuing to get worse, for example. As I said above, more than ever there are some people who are willing to listen on childhood vaccines (even if some will never listen). There might be parents who decide not to vaccinate their child with paediatric vaccines because they initially began questioning the mRNA/adenovirus vector products and saw people who spoke about about the mRNA/adenovirus vector also speaking out on childhood vaccines. This has the potential to save children from these horrific injuries.
I have tried to avoid an emotional response to the question also, but I do think we need to think through the implications from a perspective of someone who has childhood vaccine injuries. The strategic logic of only focusing on Covid ‘vaccination’ implies that people who have vaccination injuries from paediatric vaccines shouldn’t really be considered in the debate or that if we speak out we should be put to one side for strategic reasons. While this isn’t directly stated it is implied by the logic that we should focus only on the Covid ‘vaccines’.
Conclusion
I must fundamentally disagree with Dr. Clare Craig when she states that we should focus on getting the public on board with opposition to the covid ‘vaccine’ and avoid questions around the effectiveness of other vaccines. Instead I advocate opening up a debate around all vaccines, because, having come to come to the conclusion that the vaccine paradigm is entirely fraudulent that’s the only place I can be, on this topic.
Last year, I wrote a piece on ‘Complicity Theorists’ parodying the generic articles that the media puts out criticising conspiracy theorists. This article is the same sort of thing, except we are going to break down an article (with humour) rather than write a satirical essay. So let’s have a look on the ADL article on Conspiracy Theorists and see if we can’t have some fun with it:
Conspiracy Theories and How to Help Family and Friends Who Believe Them
Why assume we want your help?
Do you have someone in your life who has been drawn in by a conspiracy theory? Has their behavior changed and you’re not sure how you can help?
I was an obsessive weird loner before I became a ‘conspiracy theorist’, so yeah, don’t think I became one just because I watched too many videos from The Last American Vagabond and read too much Substack.
Perhaps your parents have ventured down the QAnon rabbit hole and have become obsessed with trying to decode social media posts by public figures. They send you a daily stream of articles and YouTube videos about how the government is controlled by pedophiles who are running a child sex trafficking ring, and they’re especially worried about the daycare center your kids attend.
I mean QAnon is a BS FBI psyop (no politician is gonna save you and that includes Donald ‘Warp Speed’ Trump), but has this person not heard of Jeffrey Epstein, Jimmy Savile, etc.?
When your family all got the Covid-19 vaccine, your mom warned you that the government implants chips in the vaccine to monitor people. Since your parents haven’t gotten the vaccine themselves because of this belief, you don’t visit them very often.
Sounds like the asshole in this scenario is the normie who doesn’t want to see his/her parents because they are not ‘vaccinated’.
Even though he doesn’t have children in the local school, your friend attends school board meetings because he is tired of “diversity” being taught to young children.
It’s not ‘diversity’ that’s the issue, people just don’t want sexualised drag queens performing in front of their kids.
You notice this friend has switched jobs every few months because he’s always getting into arguments with customers and his co-workers.
Ah yes all ‘conspiracy theorists’ argue about their politics at work.
Conspiracy theories can be defined in a variety of ways. In general, they reject established and accepted narratives, implying that sinister and powerful forces are manipulating various events and situations behind the scenes, usually for political gain.
Rejecting established narratives? Such as ‘Iraq has WMDs’, ‘Incubator Babies’ ‘Assad gassed his own people at Douma’, ‘Gulf of Tonkin’, those official narratives? How dare people think the people who pushed those narratives might be liars! How dare people question if, uh, Mike ‘We Lied We Cheated We Stole’ Pompeo is telling the truth?
As for ‘manipulation’ do people really believe that elites DON’T manipulate shit? ‘I can believe that so-and-so at work manipulates shit for petty office politics reasons, but that the most powerful people on the planet do this for their own political/economic gain, well, that’s beyond the pale.’
Conspiracy theories have been around for centuries, and often emerge from a need to make sense of the world around us.
No they emerge from the fact that official narratives don’t make fucking sense. Like the Skripals. Their own timeline that THEY put out THEMSELVES is nonsensical. We’re supposed to believe that Putin, allegedly the most competent 6d chess master on the planet, sent two cavorting assassins to Salisbury to smear the most deadly nerve agent on the planet on a doorknob and then hung around outside an antique shop rather than get the hell out of dodge. Just weeks before Russia was due to host the World Cup to promote itself on the world stage. I mean who could question this except someone who’s criminally insane?
Why do people get drawn into conspiracy theories?
Epistemic: This motivation is a need for knowledge, information and certainty. When a major event happens, people want an explanation for it and most importantly, they want to feel certain of that explanation. When people feel uncertain in specific situations or generally feel uncertain, they are drawn into conspiracy theories to help provide that certainty.
If they want ‘an explanation they can feel certain of’ surely they’d just believe the establishment narrative as those allow no criticism. Heck there is enough people who peddle the establishment’s crap who fall into that category.
Another key factor is people’s educational backgrounds; they may lack the critical thinking skills necessary to differentiate between credible and non-credible sources of information. As a result, they are looking for knowledge and certainty but do not have the tools and understanding to look in the right places.
Yeah those thick plebs don’t understand that the BBC and Reuters are supposed to be ‘trusted sources’ and you need to believe them without question, damn you!
Existential: This motivation drives the need for people to feel safe and secure in their world. People need to feel they have power over the things that happen to them and, conversely, they don’t like to feel out of control or powerless in their lives. Conspiracy theories help them believe that they have information that explains why they lack control in specific situations and more generally. Therefore, people who feel powerless tend to gravitate towards conspiracy theories.
The correct interpretation here: “People who have been screwed over by the establishment are more likely to consider perspectives that criticise the establishment.” Which is bleedingly obvious.
On an individual level, believing you have access to information and the truth, while others do not have that knowledge, gives one a feeling of superiority over others that can feed self-esteem.
Then why do ‘conspiracy theorists’ bash our heads against the wall trying to get normal people to see that, I dunno, the mRNA ‘vaccines’ are poison if all we want is for special knowledge to make us unique?
There are real reasons for people to distrust governments, corporations and other powerful figures and groups. Actual conspiracies and cover-ups occur quite regularly; Watergate, the Tuskegee experiments and COINTELPRO were all real events. However, while real conspiracies do exist, this doesn’t mean that every event or situation is the result of a nefarious plot or that powerful figures are always trying to hide the truth.
So conspiracies happened 50 years ago but don’t question if they are going on NOW you conspiracy theorist!
The Conspiracy Theory Handbook, published by Dr. Stephan Lewandowsky, a professor of cognitive science at the University of Bristol in the UK, and Dr. John Cook, a professor at the Center for Climate Change Communication at George Mason University, outlines seven traits of conspiratorial thinking, summarized with the acronym CONSPIR:
Contradictory ideas: People who have bought into conspiracy theories can simultaneously believe in ideas that contradict each other. For example, some believe that Covid-19 is a U.S.-created bioweapon but also that the virus is a hoax and doesn’t actually exist.
No, those are two separate theories that exist among those who question the Official Covid-19 Narrative. No one literally believes both. Someone might be willing to entertain both but that isn’t the same thing. Someone might say ‘On the balance of evidence I think 70% chance it is a lab virus, 30% it doesn’t exist’, that’s not the same thing either. In fact the ‘it came out of a lab’ people and the ‘no virus’ people will often argue with each other.
Overriding suspicion: Conspiracy theorists will dismiss “official” sources and any information that doesn’t “fit” neatly into the theory. They promote the idea that “traditional” sources of information–such as mainstream news outlets and academic researchers–are unreliable and are even “in on” the conspiracy, attempting to distract people from the truth.
Yes because official sources are full of fucking liars, see ‘Iraq has WMD’s’.
Journalists may sincerely believe establishment narratives, but they simply would not be hired if they did not, so mainstream media simply selects for the most dumb people on the planet who have a posh accent and sound like they know what they are talking about. Journalists are largely ‘useful idiots’ and aren’t important enough to be ‘in on the conspiracy’ a lot of the time (Dan Rather’s statement on Zapruder would be an example where the journalist was ‘in on the conspiracy’).
Nefarious intent: The people and groups behind these supposed conspiracies are always presumed to have nefarious intentions – their motivations are never benign.
Funny how all of their so called ‘mistakes’ have disastrous consequences for humanity though. I mean the guys that did Iraq then decided to go after Syria. You’d think if it was benign they’d have learned their lesson to not destroy countries?
Something must be wrong: Even if you can debunk a conspiracy theory, believers will still believe the theory because they fundamentally believe that “something must be wrong.” For conspiracy theorists, nothing is as it seems.
That’s because you probably haven’t ‘debunked’ it.
Persecuted victim: Conspiracy theorists believe that they are victims of the conspiracy. They also view themselves as heroes who are brave enough to stand up against the conspirators. If a fact-checker debunks a claim made by a conspiracy theorist, they’re seen as simply trying to discredit the believer and cast doubt on the truth.
Yeah because that’s the function of establishment funded fact checks.
I don’t think I’m important enough to be a ‘hero’, that’s generally the guys who go around talking about how they ‘destroy antivaxxers’ on Twitter, or whatever. Like that Ian Copeland guy.
Immune to evidence: Conspiracy theories cherry-pick “evidence,” selectively choosing bits of information that support the narrative and casting aside anything that contradicts the claim. Evidence that contradicts the conspiracy theory will be re-interpreted as originating from the conspiracy.
And the MSM doesn’t do this? No one is able to match up every single piece of evidence to a theory to 100% perfection (because reality is too complicated for this to be achievable), every theory has to emphasise or deemphasise certain facts. It’s about the theory that is most plausible. And conspiracy is the most plausible explanation in many cases (e.g. JFK assassination to take an obvious example).
Re-interpreting randomness: Conspiracy theories encourage believers to “do their own research” and collect their own “evidence” to prove the claim, looking for ways in which various events, people and situations are related. Events that have nothing to do with the conspiracy theory will be re-interpreted as being caused by the conspiracy.
As opposed to the establishment who tell you to uncritically believe everything out of their mouths. I know who I’m going with.
We can all fall for conspiracy theories and unintentionally aid their spread. That’s why it’s crucial for all of us to learn how to spot them. Here are some suggestions:
Check the source of the information. Additional red flags are raised when articles contain lots of grammatical errors, lack sources or are all written by the same author, or if a website contains an unusual URL or lacks an “About Us” section.
So if I get some guest authors I’m trustworthy then?
Check multiple sources. Are other, credible news outlets and experts sharing the same information? If a story is real, many publications will cover it. Have fact-checking sites like Snopes and PolitiFact refuted the claims?
Dr. Malone, Dr. McCullough, Dr. Kory, Dr. Yeadon, Dr. Bhakti, Dr. Vanden Bossche, etc, are all criticising mRNA jabs but they are all cranks according to you, despite the fact they are obviously credentialed experts. What you actually mean is if your ‘approved experts’ say something.
Evaluate photos and videos that accompany stories and social media posts. Conspiracy theorists will often use old and/or manipulated images to support their stance. Conduct a reverse image search on Google or TinEye to see if the image has shown up elsewhere and if it has been manipulated. If it has, there’s a good chance you’re being played.
What you can do (and not do) to help those who have fallen for conspiracy theories?
However, once a person has bought into a conspiracy theory, it can be difficult to help them see that the conspiracy theory is wrong, a lie and that it could lead to harm and danger.
“Once people have seen the evidence, it’s hard to stop making them see the evidence.” Well, no shit.
Learn more about the conspiracy theories: What are their central claims and where did they come from? This information puts you in a better position to understand what the person says and does.
Only make sure you read from ‘approved’ sources though, wouldn’t want to become a ‘conspiracy theorist’ yourself!
Don’t try to convince the person they are wrong, lying or ignorant. Many people think if they just send that person enough information to refute their claims, the person will change their mind. This denies the underlying need the person has to believe it and is unlikely to work. In fact, those who try to discourage a conspiracy theorist are often seen as being “in” on the conspiracy.
We don’t think you’re ‘in on the conspiracy’. We know you’re not that important.
Encourage the person to use critical thinking. You can do this by asking open-ended questions with genuine curiosity about what they believe and why. You can also encourage them to read different points of view on the topic.
Have you ever considered that we used to believe the establishment claims and then we learned more and then we rejected them?
Don’t come across as dismissive, judgmental or belittling.
If it becomes difficult to be around someone who has been drawn into a conspiracy theory, take a break. While you may take space away from the person, don’t close the door completely or cut them off. More than ever, they will need their loved ones when they stop believing the conspiracy theories.
Oh no, being around someone with different beliefs is just too hard, what am I going to do, BBC, SAVE ME!
I don’t usually put out short commentaries/news type posts as I generally like to keep the blog as a place for long posts or protest coverage. However in this case, this news story is so worthy of note, and I have seen very little on it out there so far, and I am so angry about it, that I am making an exception.
The media today in the United Kingdom have just reported the below story, headlined:
The 32-year-old, who can’t be named for legal reasons, spent lockdown in his room at a care home because his parents refused to let him be vaccinated, Jersey’s Royal Court heard.
To translate this from mainstream media bullshit to English, the care home locked him in his room because his parents did not want him to be harmed by a ‘vaccine’. When he had already been harmed by vaccines. His parents should have had him removed from the care home, if possible, although some of these care homes have put obstacles in the way of getting people out and I don’t know if that’s the case here.
Jersey’s Royal Court granted the vaccination order, saying that it was ‘the right best interests decision’ for B who had been in ‘groundhog day’.
In other words, this man is stuck because the care home won’t let him out because he’s not jabbed so they want to force him to be jabbed. When they could get rid of the problem by simply not treating him as subhuman for not being jabbed.
This also involves denying him treatments, according to the Times:
He is not able to attend the treatments, such as hydrotherapy, which soothe him, or the ones that cheer him, such as watching the Christmas lights being turned on, stuck in what his nurse describes as a “shrunken world”.
A dataset of deaths and sudden deaths provided by Patrick E. Walsh from Kilkenny, Ireland has been under-utilised by researchers investigating the surge in sudden death. However, this is a very useful dataset for researchers to examine to demonstrate a significant rise in all-cause mortality, as well as deaths classified as ‘sudden’ in a small region of Ireland. I have written this article to draw more attention to this dataset, as I have personally not seen it reported among the staples of statistical analysis in the Covid-19 ‘vaccine’ sceptic space.
What is the Kilkenny Dataset?
Recently, in response to British Parliamentarian Andrew Bridgen (who has recently become a fierce critic of the Covid-19 ‘vaccine’ in Parliament, demanding that the jabs be stopped) twitter user @_Richard_JG posted an extremely valuable article from Kilkenny, Ireland.
Look at Kilkenny, they have an 89.9% vaccine rate, deaths are off the chart.https://t.co/7qb8IqmyRU
(The source for the 89.9% ‘vaccination’ rate in Kilkenny is here. As an aside, that makes it a relatively low ‘vaccine’ uptake in comparison with other counties in Ireland!)
The article itself states:
A CONCERNED local man has emailed a group of what he terms ‘people who hold positions of influence and trust in Kilkenny’, bringing to their attention what he describes as important facts on deaths in Kilkenny, particularly sudden deaths.
Patrick Walsh has gone through the RIP.IE obituaries, to find both deaths and deaths which he classifies as ‘sudden’. He determined a sudden death by the criteria below:
Any explicit accidents or suicides are not included in ‘Suddenlys’.‘Suddenlys’ are identified by narrative or in condolences.
This follow up article contains data from Kilkenny for 6 months of the year, July to December, and compares 2018 to 2022. I have produced some graphs showing this data below.
The below chart shows the deaths by month for 2019-2022. (I excluded 2018 so the graph didn’t get too messy).
Here is the same data, in a different format, with each month rather than each year:
Here is the total deaths for the 6 month period, plotted on a chart, 2018-2022:
The Sudden Death Data
Here are the equivalent data for the sudden deaths only, as defined above.
The same data by month:
Graph Plot:
What’s Valuable About This Data?
The fact that all the obituaries are publicly posted on RIP.IE and can be searched by any individuals who are willing to do so. The critics of this kind of approach may say the data is fabricated, but this is very unlikely given that anyone can check it. For example, I checked the number of deaths for December 2022 and got the same amount as Walsh (128). As for sudden deaths, there are 11 obituaries that use the term ‘suddenly’ or ‘unexpectedly’, and several more that use the term ‘after a short/brief illness’ which can also sometimes be a code for ‘vaccine’ death. So 3 more cases from these or from comments left on the obituaries (which I did not check) means the 14 number given is reasonable, possibly slightly conservative.
This data is also good as it isn’t subject to too many biases. The deaths classified as sudden are done so in the obituaries themselves or condolences, which means they are not subject to the bias of the ‘vaccine’ sceptic who may possibly be over-eager (or be accused of being over-eager) to blame deaths on the ‘vaccine’. And it would be impossible to game obituary notices, after all, someone is either deceased or not. It is also valuable as it has a control group of ‘non-sudden deaths’ for comparison, that allows us to figure out if there is a comparative increase in death classified as ‘sudden’.
Breaking Down the Data
The graphs above clearly demonstrate that for 2022, both deaths and sudden deaths are showing a significant increase. Although there is a spike in death for November and December 2022, it is not possible to conclude from this that the number of deaths will continue to increase as this could be a seasonal spike.
I calculated the percentages of deaths for each month classified as sudden, and plotted them on a graph, seen below. As the sample size for each month is not that large (lowest = 55, highest = 128), caution is advised on that basis. Nevertheless, we see in increase in the percentage of deaths classified as sudden in 2022:
This is despite the fact that overall deaths also increased in 2022!
What is most striking about this data is there is no evidence of an increase in sudden deaths in 2021. This supports the integrity of the research itself, as anyone simply looking to manufacture data to vilify the ‘vaccine’ would start their ‘sudden death’ counting in mid-2021. This suggests that while some young and healthy people are dying immediately from the ‘vaccine’ (not shown by this data, but it is present in other datasets), significantly more relatively young and healthy people are ‘dying suddenly’ a long time after initial ‘vaccination’ (either because a booster tips the ‘vaccine’ damage calculus to fatal, or because of damage sustained by previous ‘vaccination’ doses does not immediately result in death).
That the sudden death problem is increasing is supported by evidence from the Mark Crispin Miller reports, as well as statistical analysis from sources such as Igor Chudov, who reports that the correlation between excess deaths and ‘vaccination’ rates is strengthening:
The linear regression above shows that the vaccination rate explains 49% of excess mortality and that the relationship is highly statistically significant (P < 0.0001 is extremely significant).
What is worse, compared to a similar analysis two months before, the relationship has gotten STRONGER in terms of explanatory power (R squared), as well as steepness of the slope.
This can be plausibly explained by at least three mechanisms. The first of these is the ‘subclinical myocarditis theory‘ put forward by Dr. Peter McCullough. McCullough argues that the spike proteins that are produced after an mRNA shot damage the heart in ways that may not be immediately obvious (e.g. the individual does not experience typical symptoms like chest pain). The heart damage in the presence of adrenaline (when playing sport, or when waking up) then tips the individual over the edge into cardiac arrest and sudden death. The second of these is ‘turbo cancer’, where the immune system’s ability to fight cancer is compromised, leading to rapid diagnosis of stage 4 cancer and death. The third mechanism is Ig4 immune tolerance to spike protein, which causes sudden death as it allows the spike to run rampant in the body, and the immune system does not fight the disease when exposed to Sars-Cov-2. This leads to a mild illness followed by sudden death.
How does this fit in with data showing a large number of deaths for 2021 from the ‘vaccine’, for example, VAERS? There are more overall deaths in 2021 than 2019, those deaths were simply no more likely to be classified as ‘sudden’. It’s likely some of this excess is ‘vaccine’ induced (as demonstrated by other sources), it is just not considered ‘sudden’ by the obituary writers. There may be multiple reasons for this, perhaps middle-aged and older people died more often early on from the ‘vaccine’ and their deaths were not considered ‘sudden’, while young people weathered initial ‘vaccine’ damage better, only to ‘die suddenly’ in 2022. Perhaps it is the booster – rather than dose one and two – that is the critical trigger for sudden death in a large number of cases, with the late 2021/early 2022 booster campaign proving the fatal factor.
Conclusion
Data from obituary analysis from Kilkenny, Ireland, shows a significant increase in sudden death for 2022 as opposed to previous years. This supports other sources of data that we have a significant sudden death problem in heavily ‘vaccinated’ countries. Patrick Walsh deserves credit for compiling this dataset for Kilkenny that provides yet another arrow in the bow of the ‘vaccine’ sceptic.
Vaccination is touted as the biggest success of modern medicine. Fundamentally, it it seen as a victory over nature, where the powers of man’s inventiveness have conquered the evils of disease. Unfortunately, such ‘victories’ over nature are more hubris than reality.
Vaccination as Victory over Nature?
“Let us not, however, flatter ourselves overmuch on account of our human victories over nature. For each such victory nature takes its revenge on us. Each victory, it is true, in the first place brings about the results we expected, but in the second and third places it has quite different, unforeseen effects which only too often cancel the first.”
Friedrich Engels
The official narrative on vaccination is as follows.
In the past, human beings died of preventable diseases because the pathogens that they were exposed to were inherently extremely deadly. This mass death could not have been significantly prevented by factors such as better living conditions or diet, even if those would have had a positive effect. It wasn’t until the introduction of vaccination, starting with Edward Jenner’s smallpox vaccine, that the mass death caused by disease began to subside. The introduction of mass vaccination for diseases like polio, measles, etc. in the 20th century saved millions of lives. The further development of vaccination to encompass influenza, rotavirus, etc., are a positive development for humanity and we should try to develop vaccines for all human diseases. This includes things like HIV and RSV. mRNA vaccines, as developed for Covid-19, are a new and highly promising step forward in the development of the technology. Vaccines are safe and effective outside of very rare cases of anaphylaxis. Taking any vaccine that you are offered is the best thing that you can do for your health.
So, what are the problems of this official narrative? There is data from alternative sources demonstrating that at least some of these claims are clearly false. For example: measles vaccination was only introduced after measles mortality had massively declined and thus vaccination could not have been responsible for the decline. Newer vaccinations, such as the Gardasil vaccine, have clearly unfavourable risk-benefit profiles, to the extent that some countries have stopped using it, or do not include it on official vaccine schedules.
However, I would like to go beyond this and state that there is a problem with the whole concept of vaccination. I use an analogy to illustrate the point. As it is a Computer Age analogy, hopefully, it should be understood by those most technology obsessed invokers of the Cult of Vaccination:
Vaccination is like trying to fix a circuit board with a hammer.
The reality is the human immune system is extremely complex and multifaceted. It has been developed by millions of years of Mother Nature to protect us from disease. It does that job superbly well, so long as the environment supports it, that is, that it is not undermined through poor living conditions, exposure to toxic chemicals, and poor diet.
Immune cells sense infection and other environmental cues through a variety of extracellular and intracellular receptors. Ligation of these receptors leads to signaling cascades consisting of many dynamic processes including signal‐induced protein binding, phosphorylation, degradation, and nuclear localization. These signaling events lead to changes in gene expression, and subsequently to the production of both effector proteins required to combat infection and proteins involved in regulation of the ensuing, potentially host‐damaging, response. The number of molecular players or variables involved in any such activity can vary from hundreds to thousands, making immune responses immensely complex. This complexity is amplified by the multiscalar nature of the immune system, as these signaling and transcriptional responses occur in the context of diverse and dynamic cell–cell interactions.
Vaccination is essentially trying to ‘hack’ this extremely complex system through the extremely crude method of antigen and adjuvant injection. Vaccination sees the natural immune system as ‘insert A = get B’ or ‘insert needle = get antibodies = protection against disease’. The complex cascades of multiple interlinking factors are not present in this equation. Nor are factors such as route of exposure, and that injection of a dead/attenuated pathogen is a fundamentally different mechanism to the natural exposure which would be through, for example, aerosol. And here I am talking only of what we know or can surmise, because there is a large number of things about the immune response that we probably do not know.
There are certainly some individuals who are pushing vaccination for sinister motivations. An excellent example is Bill Gates, who is interested in vaccination as a means of depopulation. But the system of vaccination could not have gained such success in society without a massive degree of hubris on the part of scientists, governments, and everyone else in society who is going along with the vaccination narrative. Instead of being driven by the specific desire to do evil, they are blinded by the hubris of a victory that is impossible.
This hubris, of course, comes back around to us when we see massive levels of vaccination injury in our population. It is difficult to estimate how much vaccine injury there is in our population, given that all information about vaccine injury is suppressed. But there is enough evidence to link vaccination to a large number of health problems including autism, anxiety and mental health problems, autoimmune diseases, heart problems, brain inflammation, narcolepsy, and multiple other conditions.
A Note on the mRNA ‘Vaccines’
I trust nature more than I trust scientists like Dr. Anthony Fauci.
In some respects, the mRNA ‘vaccines’ do not belong here, as they are not vaccines by the actual definition of the term, however they are promoted as vaccines by the establishment.
The hubris discussion, however, is even more relevant when it comes to the mRNA concoctions. The hubris of traditional vaccination was bad enough, with the direct injection of an antigen and adjuvant, expecting the ‘hacking’ of the immune system to function effectively to create the antigen and not to have adverse long term reactions. The mRNA injections, on the other hand, mess with this system in an even deeper and more intrusive – and more dangerous – way by making the body produce the spike protein itself. This kind of immune hacking has caused disastrous consequences, with spike protein running rampant in the body and causing myocarditis, pericarditis, blood clots, and neurological injury, along with a massive amount of ‘sudden death‘ that is otherwise unexplained. The mRNA experiment is portrayed as, and considered to be by insane scientists, a ‘way cool’ experiment where they get to play God.
Conclusion
The concept of vaccination has always been a fundamentally flawed method to prevent disease. Instead of having to endure natural exposure to the pathogen, vaccination allows human beings to ‘cheat’ the process of gaining natural immunity through infection. In this way, ‘victory’ over disease can be declared. The price of this hubris is a skyrocketing of chronic illness.
The Truth Be Told protests are focused on drawing attention to the horrific injuries some people have suffered after taking the Covid 19 ‘vaccine’.
The speakers were people who had been injured by these experimental injections, but most of them were unable to attend in person due to the severity of their injuries.
Listening to the speakers it was more than obvious that these ‘vaccines’ are a horror beyond comprehension. They are capable of the complete destruction of a human being not just via physical death.
The AstraZeneca Covid ‘vaccine’ was the culprit in the injuries outlined in the videos – all four speakers specified that they had AstraZeneca. The story behind the AstraZeneca jab is an interesting one in itself given that it has essentially disappeared from the market. While all of the Covid ‘vaccines’ are dangerous, all of the dangers were pinned on AstraZeneca (and in the US, J&J) despite Pfizer and Moderna causing the same effects. But there is no explicit acknowledgement that this product has been de facto pulled, and therefore no explicit acknowledgement that these individuals harmed were given a dangerous product.
After the speakers there was a march around town with leaflets being given out. There were other protests, a stall run by supporters of the official narrative on Ukraine and people who oppose the Iranian government. There was leafleting and handing out The Light Paper, not that many people wanted a leaflet unfortunately.
You can listen to the stories of the ‘vaccine’ injured on my Odysee channel.
2021 has been the year in which human beings have been subjected to the most intensive, most obsessive, and most outright nonsensical propaganda campaign in human history.
So how has that propaganda campaign held up in 2022? Fortunately, it has has been forced onto the back foot, at least to a degree. There have been victories against the narrative here in the UK, such as the NHS ‘vaccine’ mandate being rejected, the care home worker mandate being repealed, and no more lockdowns. Over here at least, there is only a small percentage of people still wearing a mask, and although the media does its best to fearmonger about Covid, people aren’t buying it any more.
On December 19, the most recent date for which reliable figures are available, just 14 Stoke-on-Trent residents were vaccinated – with one person receiving a first dose, three getting second doses and 10 booster or third doses.
There are, of course, still covid fanatics out there but they are becoming a minority.
The Bad News
There are however, new threats on the horizon. As I have said before, the point of the Official Covid Narrative is not the narrative itself. The point is to use the narrative to drive in an authoritarian, technocratic, transhumanist mass surveillance dystopia via digital IDs, Smart Cities, and Central Bank Digital Currencies. They can do this without Covid, for example, through narratives of ‘saving the planet’ or terrorism (the main narrative used to push mass surveillance prior to the Covid scam).
One of these threats is currently being pushed in Oxford:
Road blocks stopping most motorists from driving through Oxford city centre will divide the city into six “15-minute” neighbourhoods, a county council travel chief has said.
While this will be promoted as ‘saving the planet’ it is actually a form of controlling people’s movements, and will be used to normalise checkpoints through which you cannot pass if you are not the ‘right’ kind of person (whether that’s to do with ‘carbon credits’, ‘vaccination’ status, or political opinion) no doubt connected to one’s digital identity.
But there is something even more important that is worthy of discussion. The horror from this year can be summed up in two words:
Died Suddenly.
Those two words used to normalise mass deaths from the mRNA injections.
So let’s talk about died suddenly. ‘Died Suddenly’ is, in a large percentage of cases, a media euphemism for mRNA injection induced death. This largely but not entirely replaces its previous role as a euphemism for the manner of death for those that have killed themselves.
We have plausible mechanisms of mRNA ‘vaccine’ induced death. Even governments have admitted that these injections can damage the heart.Blood clots are another harm admitted by the establishment. There is significant evidence of myocarditis, pericarditis, stroke, blood clots, cardiac arrest, and heart attacks being caused by the injections – and these can lead to death.
So we have our deaths, our correlations, our mechanisms. But what I wanted to get to was the tsunami of news stories about those who ‘died suddenly’.
For the last few months, I have been working on the ‘In Memoriam of those who ‘died suddenly” project as started by Mark Crispin Miller. The project is a long compilation of deaths all around the world, posted every week, of those who ‘died suddenly’, often with no cause of death listed, or from the above listed causes that often indicate that ‘vaccination’ was involved in the death. As a result, every day I am searching for evidence of people who ‘died suddenly’ for this project.
I have my reasons for taking on this burden of death – to document this crime-in-progress of mRNA ‘vaccine’ mass murder, and other reasons and motivations I won’t get into. My experience doing this project is that it is everywhere. I focus mainly on countries with Russian-language media and Asian countries as well as the UK to a degree, but cases of people dying suddenly pop up from all over the world – either with no cause of death, or the telltale ‘cardiac arrest’, ‘blood clots’ or ‘stroke’ listed.
While the cases of young people dying of these conditions – which rarely affect them normally – are the most striking evidence of mRNA murder – we should not lose sight of the fact that this is a truly universal phenomenon. Male, female, black, white, Asian, old, young, middle aged, Western, Eastern – none of this matters. There are people in all these categories who have been killed.
People who aren’t watching this as closely as I am may not grasp the full implications of what we are witnessing. I’d like to offer some observations based on the reports I have found over the last four months:
Heart Attacks and Cardiac Arrest seem to be rampant in the 40-65 age demographic. Perhaps a slightly overlooked fact, given the more shocking cases among under 30s and sometimes teenagers.
There are a large amount of videos of people just dropping dead. Particularly from India. They are doing a normal activity like dancing and just drop.
There’s also a large amount of testimony of people just collapsing, having been fine the moment before, for example, I have found Russians dropping dead at bus stops.
I don’t believe we are getting anywhere near close to the death toll with the ‘Died Suddenly’ project. Obviously, a large number of cases are never reported anywhere. But even on top of that, there must be news articles that are never found that belong in the project. Most of the Russian ones are reported on local news media websites, for example. If one had the time to check Russian-language local news media across the whole country I reckon a lot more deaths would crop up. But no-one can feasibly manage that. Plus there’s cases excluded from the project due to ambiguity about the cause of death that may have been ‘vaccine’ related.
None of the media in any of the countries I have researched acknowledge there is even a problem, with the exception of India. Indian articles will sometimes state ‘There have been a large number of heart attacks recently’, or, ‘There have been a lot of people dying suddenly dancing at weddings, etc.’ In most cases they don’t blame the ‘vaccine’ but I have seen a couple of examples where the journalist, or who the journalist is quoting, question the ‘vaccine’.
The media is trying to blame anything but the ‘vaccine’ for these deaths, when it does acknowledge that the death was unusual more specifically. Blaming Covid is one strategy, blaming cold weather (or other random factors) for heart attacks instead of the ‘vaccine’ is another strategy. The nebulous ‘Sudden Adult Death Syndrome’ is another one.
When this fails the media accuses ‘anti-vaxxers’ of ‘weaponising’ the deaths of famous people by asking questions. I remember reading one comment that referred to us as ‘grave robbers’, showing disrespect to the deceased. Of course the true disrespect to the deceased is to refuse to ask these questions about what may have killed them.
Being honest, I don’t think this situation is going to improve, I think it will continue or get worse. Even if all ‘vaccination’ stops now, too many people have been damaged, as Dr. Peter McCullough has outlined, with subclinical heart damage that will lead to sudden death. This is where they have led us, where they watch the people that trusted them die. Us dissenters who did not take the injections – unless they resort to more extreme methods – are going to live, but what are we going to live with?
This was a walk round the city centre with some protest signs and flags. There were no speeches to record today.
The route of the march started outside the Art museum, went through the German Market and round to Pigeon Park and from there back down towards the Bull Ring. The group stopped in several places so this very short distance walk took maybe 45 minutes.
Pro Cash Messages
Now that the Covid insanity has receded somewhat (though not entirely) there is a large amount of messaging on the importance of cash – which is extremely important to combat the digital identity/social credit score matrix the elite want to build. We mustn’t forget that Covid per se is not the point, the point is to build this control matrix and Covid is merely the means.
Perhaps ‘the left’ could’ve considered the above.
The nature of the toxic covid injections was also a theme as well as the large amount of people who have ‘died suddenly’.
And also the theme of Matt Hancock, now he is an ‘I’m a Celebrity’ contestant, and his purchases of large amounts of Midazolam.
There is video footage on my Odysee account. This is the video where someone starts playing Uprising by Muse on the speakers.
Russia has pursued similar coronavirus policies to the West, including lockdowns and mass ‘vaccination’. Russia developed its own jab, Sputnik V, which is similar to the AstraZeneca ‘vaccine’. Russians, however, proved more reluctant to get jabbed than their Western counterparts. Russian vaccination rates have not gone above 60%, and even achieving this level of coverage required coercive measures. Russian regions imposed vaccine passports and no-jab-no-job policies.
When these toxic jabs are given out, ‘died suddenly’ cases inevitably follow. ‘Died Suddenly’ has become a very common phrase in articles covering deaths and obituaries. Compilers such as Mark Crispin Miller have been documenting these cases as a means to expose the jabs and document the crime-in-progress of giving these experimental injections. As Russia has no equivalent of VAERS or Yellow Card for reporting of jab injuries, good information on this is even harder to get than in the West. Cases of Russian ‘vaccine’-injury are also mostly behind a language barrier for Western audiences. Hence there has been very little coverage of the problems of Sputnik in the West, outside of Riley Waggaman and Miller’s weekly compilations.
Russian compilers have been working to expose possible/probable jab deaths, one example is this document ‘114 Doctors’ about sudden death among medical professionals. It looks as if it was compiled by the website Stop Vaczism, which was shut down at its original web address (which means all the links in the 114 doctors document to this website are unfortunately broken). This document offers a translation of the Russian text, which will be split into 2 parts. The purpose of this translation will be a) to provide more information on sudden death cases in Russia to an English-speaking audience and b) to combat the narrative put out by some individuals in the independent media – mostly those more sympathetic to some of Russia’s foreign policy positions – that Sputnik V is safe.
A note on the data: cases are in age order, starting from the youngest, and some have more data listed than others. Many of these are listed as sudden Covid-19 deaths by the authorities, others are deaths from known jab side effects (such as blood clots). Some are the ‘unknown cause of death’ we have got used to seeing over the past 18 months.
Acronyms, mostly used in the profession category:
GBUZ: State Budgetary Healthcare Institution.
MBUZ: Municipal Budgetary Healthcare Institution
CO, VO etc: First letter stands for the name of the region, second letter for the word ‘region’.
GMU: State Medical University
FGBOU: Federal State-Funded Educational Institution of Higher Education.
Any errors in translation are my own.
Anyone is free to republish this translation with a link back to this page.
Cases 58-114:
Case 58
Name: Alexander Vasilevich Paramonov
Age: 63
Region: Samarskaya
City: Syzran’
Condition: Dead
Date of Death: 28/09/2021
Profession: Doctor – obstetrics and gynecology of women’s consultation at GBUZ CO Syzran’ TsGB.
Cause of Death: Official cause of death is due to a breakaway blood clot.
Further Information: On the 28th September 2021 in the city of Syzran’ in Samarskaya region, 63-year-old Alexander Vasilevich Paramonov, a doctor of obstetrics and gynecology of women’s consultation at GBUZ CO Syzran’ TsGB, died suddenly. He died in the covid hospital, where he was hospitalised for novel coronavirus infection (Covid-19).
Case 59
Name: Tatiana Nikolaevna Giniaytova
Age: 63
Date of Birth: 19/04/1968
Region: Sverdlovskaya
City: Nizhnii Tagil
Condition: Dead
Date of Death: 26/11/2021
Profession: Midwife, stand in for obstetrician-gynecologist of the highest category, obstetrician-gynecologist at women’s service GAUZ SO ‘GB no 1 in the city of Nizhnii Tagil.’
Cause of Death: Official cause of death is coronavirus infection
Further Information: On the 26th November in the city of Nizhnii Tagil in Sverdlovskaya region, 63-year-old Tatiana Nikolaevna Giniaytova, midwife, stand in for obstetrician-gynecologist of the highest category, obstetrician-gynecologist at women’s service GAUZ SO ‘GB no 1 in the city of Nizhnii Tagil’, died suddenly.
Case 60
Name: Marina Borisovna Slutskaya
Age: 64
Date of Birth: 02/09/1956
Region: Moscow
City: Moscow
‘Vaccine’: EpiVacKorona
Condition: Dead
Date of Most Recent ‘Vaccination’: 08/07/2021
Date of Death: 08/08/2021
Time After ‘Vaccination’: 30 days
Profession: Doctor
Further Information: On the 8th August 2021, vaccinated 64-year-old Marina Borisovna Slutskaya died. On the 08/07/2021 she received her second ‘vaccine’ against coronavirus, and began to feel worse after 4 days. As written on social media by Dmitrii Drobyshevsky, “Today Mura is gone, a good person from our group.”
Case 61
Name: Pavel Lvovich Polyeshaev
Age: 64
Region: Khabarovskii
City: Komsomolsk in Amur
Condition: Dead
Date of Most Recent ‘Vaccination’: 07/07/2021
Date of Death: 09/07/2021
Time After ‘Vaccination’: 2 days
Profession: Ambulance doctor
Cause of Death: Official cause of death is kidney failure.
Further Information: In Komsomolsk in Amur an emergency doctor, Pavel Lvovich Polyeshaev, was vaccinated on the 7th July, and on the 9th July he died. This summer was his last. Pavel was 64 years old. Medics came straight to him in an ambulance. This was on 7 July, and his temperature had risen to 40 degrees, and his kidneys failed. And the person died, the doctor died.
Case 62
Name: Igor Vasilevich Ushakov
Age: 64
Date of Birth: 25/09/1957
Region: Irkutskaya
City: Irkutsk
Condition: Dead
Date of Death: 22/11/2021
Profession: Lead doctor at OGAUZ Irkutsk Regional Clinical Consultative-Diagnostic Centre, degree in medical science, President NO ‘Diagnostic Medical Association’.
Cause of Death: Official cause of death is coronavirus infection
Further Information: On the 22nd November in Irkutsk 64 year old Igor Vasilevich Ushakov, lead doctor at OGAUZ Irkutsk Regional Clinical Consultative-Diagnostic Centre, degree in medical science, President NO ‘Diagnostic Medical Association’, died suddenly from coronavirus.
Case 63
Name: Irina Borisovna Gorokhova
Age: 65
Date of Birth: 06/03/1956
Region: Yaroslavskaya
City: Rybinsk
Condition: Dead
Date of Death: 02/07/2021
Profession: Paediatric lead at Rybinsk wing of the Yaroslav medical college
Further Information: On the 2nd July 2021, in Rybinsk in Yaroslav region 65-year-old Irina Borisovna Gorokhova, paediatric lead at Rybinsk wing of the Yaroslav medical college, died suddenly. The website of the Yaroslav Medical College did not even post an obituary. According to local residents she died after ‘vaccination’.
Case 64
Name: Ludmila Ivanovna Bezcmertnikh
Age: 65
Date of Birth: 05/02/1956
Region: Moskovskaya
City: Lotoshina
‘Vaccine’: Sputnik V
Condition: Dead
Date of Death: 25/08/2021
Profession: Deputy to the lead doctor with expertise on temporal disability GBUZ MO Lotoshina TsRB
Further Information: On the 25th August in Lotoshino in Moskovskaya region, 65-year-old Ludmila Ivanovna Bezcmertnikh, deputy to the lead doctor with expertise on temporal disability GBUZ MO Lotoshina TsRB, suddenly died. No cause of death was reported.
Case 65
Name: Vladimir Grigorevich Pravdin
Age: 65
Date of Birth: 25/06/1956
Region: Vologodskaya
City: Cherepovets
Condition: Dead
Date of Death: 03/11/21
Profession: Highly-qualified rheumatologist, Doctor of functional diagnostics BUZ VO Cherepovets City Polyclinic No.2.
Cause of Death: Official cause of death is coronavirus infection.
Further Information: On the 3rd November at the mono-hospital in Cherepovets in Vologodskaya region, the 65-year-old highly-qualified rheumatologist, doctor of functional diagnostics at BUZ VO Cherepovets City Polyclinic No.2 Vladimir Grigorevich Pravdin, died suddenly from novel coronavirus infection.
Case 66
Name: Pyotr Ivanovich Romanyuk
Age: 66
Date of Birth: 18/06/1955
Region: Moskovskaya
City: Mikulino
Condition: Dead
Date of Death: 14/10/21
Profession: Merited doctor of the Russian Federation, lead doctor at GBUZ MO ‘MOPB-12’, chairman of the Council of Deputies, honourable resident of the city region of Lotoshino. 19th March 2021 he was elected to the regional secretary of United Russia party.
Further Information: On the 14th October in Mikulino in Lotoshinsky of Moscow region, merited doctor of the Russian Federation, lead doctor at GBUZ MO ‘MOPB-12’, chairman of the Council of Deputies, honourable resident of the city region of Lotoshino, 66-year-old Pyotr Ivanovich Romanyuk died suddenly.
Case 67
Name: Iraida Albertovna Ryazanova
Age: 66
Date of Birth: 29/09/1954
Region: Chelyabinskaya
City: Kopeisk
Condition: Dead
Date of Death: 31/08/2021
Profession: Paediatrician, nurse at the department at Dundisha GBUZ City Children’s Polyclinic No.1 in the city of Kopeisk.
Further Information: On the 31 August in the Covid ward in Kopeisk in Chelyabinskaya, a paediatrician and nurse at the department at Dundisha GBUZ City Children’s Polyclinic No.1 in the city of Kopeisk, 66-year-old Iraida Albertovna Ryazanova died suddenly of novel coronavirus infection.
Case 68
Name: Mikhail Mikhailovich Levsha
Age: 66
Region: Primorskii
City: Nakhodka
Condition: Dead
Date of Death: 03/11/2021
Profession: Anesthetist in the highest category SP at Children’s Hospital No. 2 KGBUZ Nakhodka City Hospital
Further Information: On the 3rd November 2021 in the city of Nakhodka, an anesthetist in the highest category SP at Children’s Hospital No. 2 KGBUZ Nakhodka City Hospital, 66-year-old Mikhail Mikhailovich Levsha, died suddenly.
Case 69
Name: Valerii Arkadevich Ogorodov
Age: 66
Date of Birth: 06/08/1955
Region: Permskii
City: Aleksandrovsk
Condition: Dead
Date of Death: 17/10/2021
Profession: Divisional doctor at the outpatient clinic at region of Karyer Isvestyak GBUZ PK Alexandrovsk TsGB
Further Information: On the 17th October in Aleksandrovsk in Perm region 66-year-old Valerii Arkadevich Ogorodov, a divisional doctor at the outpatient clinic at region of Karyer Isvestyak GBUZ PK Alexandrovsk TsGB, died suddenly.
Case 70
Name: Valerii Ivanovich Sovalkin
Age: 66
Date of Birth: 07/11/1955
Region: Omskaya
City: Omsk
Condition: Dead
Date of Death: 05/12/2021
Profession: Prorector of Postgraduate Education, lead chair of hospital medicine and endocrinology, doctor of medical science, professor FGBOU VO ‘OmGMU Ministry of Health of Russia’
Further Information: On the 5th December 2021 in Omsk, 66-year-old Valerii Ivanovich Sovalkin, Prorector of Postgraduate Education, lead chair of hospital medicine and endocrinology, doctor of medical science, professor FGBOU VO ‘OmGMU Ministry of Health of Russia’, died suddenly.
Case 71
Name: Olga Petrovna Barkovskaya
Age: 66
Region: Chelyabinskaya
City: Chelyabinsk
Condition: Dead
Date of Death: 12/10/2021
Profession: Psychiatrist, deputy lead doctor at the medical part of GBUZ ‘regional clinical specialist psychiatric hospital no. 1’
Further Information: On the 12th October 2021 in Chelyabinsk 66-year-old Olga Petrovna Barkovskaya, psychiatrist and deputy lead doctor at the medical part of GBUZ ‘regional clinical specialist psychiatric hospital no. 1’ died suddenly.
Case 72
Name: Valentina Vasilevna Krylova
Age: 67
Date of Birth: 11/04/1954
Region: Irkutskaya
City: Taishet
Condition: Dead
Profession: Major of internal service, boss of the infirmary Taishet SIZO No. 3.
Further Information: On the 2nd August 2021 in the hospital at the city of Angarsk in Irkutskaya, 67-year-old resident of Taishet Valentina Vasilevna Krylova, a doctor, major of internal service and boss of the infirmary FKU ‘SIZO-3 GUFSIN Russia in Irkutsk region’, died suddenly from covid.
Case 73
Name: Viktor Petrovich Tsimbayuk
Age: 67
Date of Birth: 24/02/1954
Region: Ulyanovskaya
City: Dimitrovgrad
Condition: Dead
Date of Death: 10/11/2021
Profession: Surgeon at KB No.172 department FGBU ‘FNKTsRiO’ FMBA of Russia
Further Information: In Dimitrovgrad in Ulyanovsk 67-year-old Viktor Petrovich Tsimbayuk, surgeon at KB No.172 department FGBU ‘FNKTsRiO’ FMBA of Russia, suddenly died of novel coronavirus infection.
Case 74
Name: Alexander Minevsky
Age: 67
Region: Rostovskaya
City: Taganrog
Condition: Dead
Date of Death: 19/03/2021
Profession: Lead doctor at the Centre for Medical Rehabilitation no. 1
Further Information: On the night of 19th March 2021 in Taganrog of Rostov region, 67-year-old Alexander Minevsky, lead doctor at the Centre for Medical Rehabilitation no. 1, suddenly died. It was written in commentaries that he died of a heart attack after his second dose of the ‘vaccination’. It is known that the medic had recently had a coronavirus infection.
Cause of Death: Official cause of death is coronavirus infection.
Further Information: On the 13th October 2021 in the city of Solikamsk in Perm region, 67 year old Valerii Vasilevich Tailashev, a trauma orthopaedist and surgeon at the inpatient facility GBUZ PK Solikamsk TsPB, died suddenly. The reason for his death is not named, but according to comments he died from novel coronavirus infection.
Case 76
Name: Vladislav Viktorovich Lonsky
Age: 67
Date of Birth: 05/01/1954
Region: Orenburgskaya
City: Orenburg
Condition: Dead
Date of Death: 05/08/2021
Profession: Otolaryngologist, doctor of the highest category, degree in medical science, merited doctor of the Russian Federation, GAUZ Orenburg Regional Clinical Hospital
Cause of Death: He fell ill a week after taking the first dose of the ‘vaccine’.
Further Information: On the 5th August 2021 in Orenburg, Vladislav Viktorovich Lonsky, 67, an otolaryngologist, doctor of the highest category, degree in medical science, merited doctor of the Russian Federation, GAUZ Orenburg Regional Clinical Hospital died of coronavirus.
Case 77
Name: Antonina Ivanovna Grekova
Age: 67
Date of Birth: 14/02/1953
Region: Smolenskaya
City: Smolensk
Condition: Dead
Date of Death: 07/10/2021
Profession: Degree in medical science, merited doctor of the Russian Federation, reader, Infection specialist OGBUZ ‘KB no. 1’, lead at the department of infectious diseases in children FGBOU VO SGMU MZ of Russia.
Cause of Death: Official cause of death is coronavirus infection
Further Information: On the 7th October in the infection department of the clinical hospital of Smolensk, 67-year-old Antonina Ivanovna Grekova, degree in medical science, merited doctor of the Russian Federation, reader, Infection specialist OGBUZ ‘KB no. 1’, lead at the department of infectious diseases in children, died suddenly from coronavirus.
Case 78
Name: Fyodor Fadeyevich Filippov
Age: 68
Date of Birth: 02/02/1953
Region: Sevastopol
City: Sevastopol
Condition: Dead
Date of Death: 04/08/2021
Time after ‘Vaccination’: 0 days
Profession: Urologist at OOO ‘Medical-Sevastopol’
Further Information: In Sevastopol 68-year-old Fyodor Fadeyevich Filippov, a urologist at OOO ‘Medical-Sevastopol’, suddenly died. According to residents, he died several hours after ‘vaccination’. On the website of OOO ‘Medical-Sevastopol’ there isn’t even an obituary for this famous Sevastopol doctor who served 44 years in medicine.
Case 79
Name: Vasilii Alexandrovich Laktanov
Age: 68
Region: Moskovskaya
City: Orekhovo-Zuevo
Condition: Dead
Date of Death: 29/11/2021
Profession: Trauma Orthopaedist at GBUZ MO ‘Orekhovo-Zuevo TsGB’, OOO Clinic of New Medicine
Further Information: On the 29th November 2021 in city of Orekhovo-Zuevo in Moskovskaya region, 68-year-old Vasilii Alexandrovich Laktanov, a trauma orthopaedist at GBUZ MO ‘Orekhovo-Zuevo TsGB’, OOO Clinic of New Medicine, suddenly died. In commentaries it was written that his cause of death was cancer.
Case 80
Name: Tatiana Vasilevna Zhdannikova
Age: 68
Region: Khabarovskii
City: Mariinsckii Reid
Condition: Dead
Date of Death: 04/12/2021
Profession: Nurse at the Reid department of KGBUZ ‘Ulchckaya regional hospital’, veteran of labour
Cause of Death: Official cause of death is coronavirus infection
Further Information: On the 4th October in Mariinskii Reid in the Ulchskaya region of Kharabovskii, 68-year-old Tatiana Vasilevna Zhdannikova, a nurse at the Reid department of KGBUZ ‘Ulchckaya regional hospital’ and veteran of labour, died suddenly from novel coronavirus infection.
Case 81
Name: Viktor Konstantinovich Alesenko
Age: 69
Region: Primorskii
City: Nakhodka
Condition: Dead
Date of Death: 14/09/2021
Profession: Honoured health defender of the Russian Federation, Obstetrician and Gynecologist in the highest category SP ‘City Hospital No. 1’ KGBUZ Nakhodka City Hospital. Viktor Alesenko headed the gynecological department for 11 years.
Further Information: On the 14th September 2021 in the city of Nakhodka in Primorskii region 69-year-old honoured health defender of the Russian Federation, Obstetrician and Gynecologist in the highest category SP ‘City Hospital No. 1’ KGBUZ Nakhodka City Hospital, Viktor Konstantinovich Alesenko, died suddenly.
Case 82
Name: Tatiana Alexandrovna Solodkova
Age: 69
Region: Samarskaya
City: Syzran’
Condition: Dead
Date of Death: 24/09/2021
Profession: Doctor of the highest category, Obstetrician & Gynecologist, leader of women’s consultations at GBUZ SO Syzran’ City Hospital No.2′ After several days of Covid-19 her spouse died.
Cause of Death: Official cause of death is coronavirus infection.
Further Information: On the 24th September 2021 in the Covid hospital in Syzran’ in Samarskaya region, 69-year-old Tatiana Alexandrovna Solodkova, a doctor of the highest category, obstetrician & gynecologist, leader of women’s consultations at GBUZ SO Syzran’ City Hospital No.2′, died suddenly from Covid-19.
Case 83
Name: Nikolai Viktorovich Menkov
Age: 70
Date of Birth: 18/07/1951
Region: Nizhegorodskaya
City: Nizhnii Novgorod
Condition: Dead
Date of Death: 24/08/2021
Profession: Lead Pulmonary Specialist in Nizhegorodskaya region, pulmonary specialist, degree in medical science, reader at the department of preliminary studies on medical diseases NizhGMA
Cause of Death: Official cause of death is coronavirus infection
Further Information: On the 24th August in the city of Nizhnii Novgorod, 70-year-old Nikolai Viktorovich Menkov, Lead Pulmonary Specialist in Nizhegorodskaya region, pulmonary specialist, degree in medical science, reader at the department of preliminary studies on medical diseases NizhGMA, died suddenly from coronavirus infection.
Case 84
Name: Lyudmila Grigorevna Bondarchuk
Age: 70
Region: Sverdlovskaya
City: Yekaterinburg
Condition: Dead
Date of Death: 01/11/2021
Profession: Doctor of the highest category, cosmetic dermatologist at the polyclinic 3 Shinnom factory GAUZ SO central city hospital no. 20.
Cause of Death: official cause of death is coronavirus infection.
Further Information: On 1st November 2021 in the city of Yekaterinburg, 70-year-old Lyudmila Grigorevna Bondarchuk, a doctor of the highest category, cosmetic dermatologist at the polyclinic 3 Shinnom factory GAUZ SO central city hospital no. 20, suddenly died from complications of Covid 19.
Case 85
Name: Sergei Andreevich Perov
Age: 70
Region: Perm
City: Solikamsk
Condition: Dead
Date of Death: 23/09/2021
Profession: Trauma orthopaedist leader at the trauma point GBUZ PK City hospital in the city of Solikamsk
Further Information: On the 23rd of September 2021, in Solikamsk in Perm region, 70-year-old Sergei Andreevich Perov, a trauma orthopaedist and leader at the trauma point at GBUZ PK City hospital in the city of Solikamsk, died suddenly. No cause of death was given.
Case 86
Name: Tatiana Alexandrovna Ovsyannikova
Age: 71
Date of Birth: 12/09/1950
Region: Sverdlovskaya
City: Nizhnii Tagil
Condition: Dead
Date of Death: 20/10/2021
Profession: Doctor of the highest category, doctor at UZI, Obstetrician & gynecologist at women’s consultation office GAUZ SO ‘GB no.1 in the city of Nizhnii Tagil’
Cause of Death: Official cause of death is coronavirus infection.
Further Information: On the 20th October 2021, in the city of Nizhnii Tagil in Sverdlovsk region, 71-year-old Tatiana Alexandrovna Ovsyannikova, doctor of the highest category, doctor at UZI, Obstetrician & gynecologist at women’s consultation office GAUZ SO ‘GB no.1 in the city of Nizhnii Tagil’, died suddenly from Covid-19.
Case 87
Name: Nikolai Vasilevich Filippov
Age: 71
Date of Birth: 15/12/1949
Region: Volgogradskaya
City: Volgograd
Condition: Dead
Date of Death: 03/11/2021
Profession: Famous scientist with a large amount of experience in practical work in a vet’s in Volgogradskaya region, veterinarian, Doctor of Veterinary Science, professor at the department of infectious pathology and forensic veterinary medicine FGOU VPO Vologogradskaya GSKhA.
Cause of Death: Official cause of death is coronavirus infection
Further Information: On the 3rd November at the Infection hospital at the base of hospital no.4
Case 88
Name: Tatiana Petrovna Khodyreva
Age: 71
Date of Birth: 23/09/1950
Region: Perm
City: Berezniki
‘Vaccine’: Sputnik V
Condition: Dead
Date of Death: 25/10/2021
Profession: Radiographer at KDO ‘KB named for academic E. A. Vagner.
Cause of Death: Official cause of death is coronavirus infection
Further Information: on the 25/10/2021 in Berezniki in Perm region the Sputnik-‘vaccinated’ 71-year-old Tatiana Petrovna Khodyreva, a radiographer at KDO ‘KB named for academic E. A. Vagner, died suddenly from Covid-19.
Case 89
Name: Mikhail Viktorovich Zhivotovskii
Age: 72
Region: Nizhegorodskaya
City: Nizhnii Novgorod
‘Vaccine’: KoviVac
Condition: Dead
Date of Death: 21/07/2021
Time after ‘Vaccination’: 21 days.
Profession: Doctor, paediatric infection specialist, lead at the department GBUZ NO Infection Clinical Hospital No. 23 in the city of Nizhnii Novgorod
Cause of Death: Official cause of death is coronavirus infection
Further Information: On the 21st July in the city of Nizhnii Novgorod, 72-year-old Mikhail Viktorovich Zhivotovskii, a paediatric infection specialist and lead at the department GBUZ NO Infection Clinical Hospital No. 23 in the city of Nizhnii Novgorod, died suddenly from Covid-19.
Case 90
Name: Alexander Pavlovich Medvedev
Age: 72
Date of Birth: 01/07/1949
Region: Nizhegorodskaya
City: Nizhnii Novgorod
Condition: Dead
Date of Death: 23/10/2021
Profession: Doctor, original scientist, Doctor of Medical Science, heart surgeon, professor, lead at the department of hospital surgery named for B A Korolyov FGBOU VO PIMU
Cause of Death: Official cause of death is coronavirus infection.
Further Information: On the 23 October 2021 in the city of Nizhnii Novgorod, 72-year-old Alexander Pavlovich Medvedev, an original scientist, Doctor of Medical Science, heart surgeon, professor and lead at the department of hospital surgery named for B A Korolyov, died suddenly from Covid-19.
Cause of Death: Official cause of death is coronavirus infection
Further Information: On the 8th November 2021 in Syzran’ in Saratov region 72 year old Vera Ivanovna Teryokhina, a paediatrician at GBUZ Syzran’ City Polyclinic – Children’s polyclininc no. 1, died suddely from coronavirus infection.
Case 92
Name: Yevgenia Petrovna Kochetova
Age: 74
Region: Samarskaya
City: Novokuibyshevsk
Reason for ‘Vaccination’: Mandate
Condition: Dead
Date of Death: 11/09/2021
Time after ‘Vaccination’: 45 days
Profession: Paeditrician at GBUZ SO Novokuibyshevsk TsGB
Cause of Death: Official cause of death is pneumonia and thrombosis
Further Information: On 11/09/2021 in Novokuibyshevsk in Samarskaya region 74 year old Yevgenia Petrovna Kochetova, a paeditrician at GBUZ SO Novokuibyshevsk TsGB, died suddenly one and a half months after her second dose of the ‘vaccine’ of pneumonia and thrombosis.
Case 93
Name: Vladimir Mikhailovich Medvedev
Age: 74
Date of Birth: 09/08/1947
Region: Orenburgskaya
City: Buguruslan
Condition: Dead
Date of Death: 26/08/2021
Profession: Surgeon, lead doctor at MBUZ ‘BTsGB’
Further Information: On the 26/08/2021 in Buguruslan in Orenburgskaya region surgeon Vladimir Mikhailovich Medvedev suddenly died. According to local residents, he died after ‘vaccination’.
Case 94
Name: Nadezhda Konstantinovna Bondareva
Age: 75
Date of Birth: 11/05/1946
Region: Tverskaya
City: Kimry
Condition: Dead
Date of Death: 03/09/2021
Profession: Paediatrician at division of GBUZ TO Kimry Central Regional Hospital – Children’s Polyclinic No. 1
Cause of Death: Official cause of death is coronavirus infection
Further Information: On the 3rd of September in Kimry in Tver region 75-year-old Nadezhda Konstantinovna Bondareva, a paediatrician at division of GBUZ TO Kimry Central Regional Hospital – Children’s Polyclinic No. 1, died suddenly.
Case 95
Name: Alla Nikolayevna
Age: 76
Region: Voronezhskaya
City: Voronezh
‘Vaccine’: Sputnik V
Reason for ‘Vaccination’: Voluntary
Condition: Dead
Dates of ‘Vaccination’: 14/07/2021 & 04/08/2021
Date of Death: 28/09/2021
Time after ‘Vaccination’: 55 days
Profession: Nurse
Cause of Death: Official cause of death is pulmonary edema induced by covid related pneumonia
Further Information: On the 28th August 2021, 55 days after being ‘vaccinated’ with Sputnik, 76-year-old Alla Nikolaevna suddenly died. Alla received her first ‘vaccination’ on the 14th July and her second on 4th August, on 19th September she fell ill with Covid-19. After 10 days pneumonia had eaten 99% of her lungs.
Case 96
Name: Larisa Petrovna Yegorina
Age: 77
Date of Birth: 13/04/1944
Region: Republic of Komi
City: Usinsk
Reason for ‘Vaccination’: Mandate
Condition: Dead
Date of Death: 30/07/2021
Time after ‘Vaccination’: 22 days.
Profession: Physiotherapy Nurse at the Physiotherapy department of GBUZ PK Usinsk Central Regional Hospital.
Further Information: In Usinsk 77-year-old physiotherapy Nurse at the Physiotherapy department of GBUZ PK Usinsk Central Regional Hospital, Larisa Petrovna Yegorina, died from coronavirus 22 days after injection with the experimental ‘vaccine’.
Case 97
Name: Boris Andreyevich Bukovkin
Age: 84
Region: Nizhegorodskaya
City: Nizhnii Novgorod
Condition: Dead
Date of Death: 30/10/2021
Profession: Doctor, Academic surgeon
Cause of Death: Official cause of death is coronavirus infection
Further Information: Let me give you sad news, 30/10/21. A great man, our colleague academic surgeon Boris Andreyevich Bukovkin has died from Covid. He was 84, he was ‘vaccinated’ in the summer.
Case 98
Name: Olga Viktorovna Khodyreva
Age: Unknown
Region: Kirovskaya
City: Kirovo-Chepetsk
‘Vaccine’: Sputnik V
Condition: Dead
Date of Most Recent ‘Vaccination’: 17/07/2021
Date of Death: 30/07/2021
Profession: Kirov region medical worker
Cause of Death: Official cause of death is ischemia
Further Information: Hello. A tragedy happened. On the 30th July 2021, Olga Viktorovna Khodyreva died. On the 17th July she had received her second dose of Sputnik-V. She worked in Kirovo-Chepetsk as a medical worker. The cause of death was cardiac arrest in her sleep, she didn’t have any medical conditions.
Case 99
Name: Igor Yevgenovich Korolyov
Age: Unknown
Region: Moscow
City: Moscow
‘Vaccine’: KoviVac
Condition: Dead
Date of Most Recent ‘Vaccination’: 24/07/2021
Date of Death: 15/08/2021
Time After ‘Vaccination’: 22 days.
Profession: Doctor at the Consultative-Diagnostic Centre No. 2 Department of Health Defense for the City of Moscow
Further Information: Complications begin on 25/07/2021. On 15th August Igor Yevgenovich Korolyov died from ‘vaccination’ – a doctor at the Consultative-Diagnostic Centre No. 2 Department of Health Defense for the City of Moscow. Throughout the pandemic he had worked with covid patients who were taken into hospital.
Case 100
Name: Surname unknown
Age: Unknown
Region: Moscow
City: Moscow
Condition: Dead
Date of Most Recent ‘Vaccination’: 25/06/2021
Date of Death: 26/06/2021
Time After ‘Vaccination’: 1 day.
Profession: Neurologist at the centre of Endo-surgery and Lithotripsy
Further Information: Complications begin 25/06/2021.
Case 101
Name: Yuri Grigorevich Svetlakov
Age: Unknown
Region: Perm
City: Osa
Reasons for ‘Vaccination’: Voluntary
Condition: Dead
Date of Death: 27/06/2021
Time After ‘Vaccination’: 21 days.
Profession: Paediatrician
Further Information: In the city of Osa in Perm region 3 weeks after vaccination, paediatrician Yuri Grigorevich Svetlakov suddenly died. According to his spouse, a week after ‘vaccination’ his autoimmune condition (myasthenia) started to get worse, he suffered cardiac arrest and died 10 days later in a coma in intensive care.
Case 102
Name: Yegor Viktorovich Polin
Age: Unknown
Region: Krasnodarskii
City: Sochi
Reason for ‘Vaccination’: Voluntary
Condition: Dead
Date of Most Recent ‘Vaccination’: 22/06/2021
Date of Death: 02/08/2021
Profession: Doctor as Sochi Hospital No. 4
Further Information: On 02/08/2021 the death of Yegor Viktorovich Polin became known. He worked as a doctor in City Hospital No. 4 in Sochi. On the 22nd June he wrote on his Instagram page that he was ‘vaccinated’. On the 3rd August the hospital website published his obituary.
Case 103
Name: Surname unknown
Age: Unknown
Region: Kursk
City: Kursk
Condition: Dead
Date of Death: 23/11/2021
Profession: Doctor at the Kursk Venereal Disease Dispensary
Cause of Death: More than 90% lung injury, official cause of death is coronavirus.
Further Information: The deputy governor of Kursk Oblast Andrei Beloctotskii told the story of the death of a regional doctor at the venereal disease dispensary in a meeting of the operational staff. He said that she had had two doses of the ‘vaccine’ already in February. More than half a year passed. She recently became ill, her lung function was injured by 90%.
Case 104
Name: Althea Rifkhatovna Ismagilova
Age: Unknown
Region: Republic of Bashkortostan
City: Ufa
Condition: Dead
Date of Death: 20/11/2021
Profession: Paediatrician at the children’s department No. 3 GBUZ RB City Children’s Clinical Hospital No. 17.
Further Information: On the 20th November 2021 in Ufa in the Republic of Bashkortostan, Althea Rifkhatovna Ismagilova, a paediatrician at the children’s department No. 3 GBUZ RB City Children’s Clinical Hospital No. 17, died suddenly.
Case 105
Name: Surname unknown
Age: Unknown
Region: Kaluzhskaya
City: Kaluga
Condition: Dead
Profession: Lead doctor at Kaluzhskaya ambulance service
Further Information: Date of ‘vaccination’: 04/01/2021. Complications begin 08/01/2021. On the evening of the 8th January the lead doctor at Kaluzhskaya ambulance service and trauma doctor Viktoria Kardash died from complications, caused by coronavirus. A few days before she died she was in intensive care with coronavirus.
Case 106
Name: Alexander Anatolevich Stolbov
Age: Unknown
Region: Ulyanovskaya
City: Ulyanovsk
Condition: Dead
Date of Death: 26/02/2021
Profession: Surgeon
Further Information: On the 26th February 2021 surgeon Alexander Anatolevich Stolbov suddenly died alone in the hospital in Podmoskovye. He died a month after taking the experimental Covid-19 injection.
Case 107
Name: Surname unknown
Age: Unknown
Region: Magadanskaya
City: Ola
Condition: Dead
Profession: Paediatrician in the town of Ola
Further Information: Date of ‘vaccination’ was in March 2021. On the 23rd August we heard of the death of a paediatrician in the town of Ola in Magadanskaya region. In March 2021 the doctor had two doses of the ‘vaccination’ and in July they became ill.
Case 108
Name: Alexander Alexandrovich Grigoryev
Age: Unknown
Region: Voronezhskaya
City: Borisoglebsk
Condition: Dead
Date of Death: 06/10/2021
Profession: Doctor of the mobile brigade of the department of the ambulance service BUZ VO Borisoglebsk RB, teacher at medical college.
Cause of Death: Official cause of death is sudden cardiac arrest
Further Information: On the 6th October 2021 in Borisoglebsk in Voronezhskaya region, Alexander Alexandrovich Grigoryev, a doctor of the mobile brigade of the department of the ambulance service BUZ VO Borisoglebsk RB and teacher at medical college, suddenly died.
Case 109
Name: Lyudmila Viktorovna Belova
Age: Unknown
Region: Novgorodskaya
City: Velikii Novgorod
Condition: Dead
Profession: Oncologist
Further Information: A resident of Velikii Novogorod talked about the death of Lyudmila Viktorovna Belova, an oncologist at Regional Clinical Oncological Dispensary in Velikii Novgorod, who died on 08/09/2021 from thrombosis after their second dose of the ‘vaccine’.
Case 110
Name: Lyaisan Yusupova
Age: Unknown
Region: Republic of Bashkortostan
City: Ufa
‘Vaccine’: Sputnik V
Condition: Ill
Profession: Doctor and plastic surgeon
Further Information: Doctor and plastic surgeon Lyaisan Yusupova talked about her battle with coronavirus on social media.
Case 111
Name: Masrut Mazitovich Shamsutdinov
Age: Unknown
Region: Republic of Bashkortostan
City: Sterlitamak
Condition: Dead
Date of Death: 13/08/2021
Profession: Doctor – phthisiatrician, the former lead doctor at GBUZ Sterlitamak Inter Regional Anti-Tuberculosis Dispensary
Cause of Death: Official cause of death is coronavirus infection
Further Information: On the 13th August 2021 in Sterlitamak in the Republic of Bashkortostan, Masrut Mazitovich Shamsutdinov, a phthisiatrician, the former lead doctor at GBUZ Sterlitamak Inter Regional Anti-Tuberculosis Dispensary, died suddenly from Covid-19.
Case 112
Name: Vyacheslav Filippovich Kolyadenko
Age: Unknown
Region: Saratovskaya
City: Saratov
Condition: Dead
Date of Death: 01/08/2021
Profession: Former lead at department of children’s illnesses at Saratov Medical Institute
Further Information: Date of vaccination: in May 2021. On the 1st August 2021 in Saratov the vaccinated Vyacheslav Filippovich Kolyadenko, former lead at department of children’s illnesses at Saratov Medical Institute between 1987 and 2003, died. He graduated from the Saratov Medical Institute in 1964, he worked as a paediatrician in Novosibirsk in 1973.
Case 113
Name: Galina Ivanovna Makarova
Age: Unknown
Region: Republic of Bashkortostan
City: Sterlitamak
Condition: Dead
Date of Death: 18/09/2021
Profession: ENT doctor at GBUZ RB City Hospital No. 2 in the city of Sterlitamak
Cause of Death: Official cause of death is coronavirus infection
Further Information: On the 18th September 2021 in Sterlitamak in the Republic of Bashkortostan, Galina Ivanovna Makarova, an ENT doctor at GBUZ RB City Hospital No. 2 in the city of Sterlitamak, died suddenly from Covid-19
Case 114
Name: Elena Andreyevna Rybalkina
Age: Unknown
Region: Chelyabinskaya
City: Magnitogorsk
Condition: Dead
Date of Death: 07/09/2021
Profession: Dentist at OOO ‘Stomateks’
Cause of Death: Official cause of death is myocardiopathy
Further Information: On the 7th September 2021 in Magnitogorsk in Chelyabinskaya Elena Andreyevna Rybalkina, a dentist at OOO ‘Stomateks’, suddenly died.
Cassandra's Box 