I went to a protest against Digital ID in Birmingham City Centre on 11 October, 2025. I have taken some photos and video for upload (the videos will be uploaded at a later date).
The themes of the protest were basically what you would expect. There were still quite a lot of references to the Covid issue and the vaccines. Rameece, a rap artist who had previously attended some anti-Covid events, did his rap song about the Covid vaccine.
One example among many of Covid themed signsRameece
Other themes that came up were 5G, the One Login system implemented by the government and its relation to digital ID, and other authoritarian surveillance legislation such as the Onljne Safety Bill. As well as usual themes of criticism of the claims of climate change, Agenda 2030, the UN, WEF, etc.
The attendance for this protest was a few hundred people. It looked like primarily the people who used to attend the anti lockdown protests, I recognised several faces from those events.
Politician Andrew Bridgen also attended the protest.
He said that he knows a Labour MP who has admitted he essentially votes with the Labour whip (for non UK readers, the ‘whip’ enforces voting with the party) without even reading the legislation.
Andrew Bridgen
There has been an update on Digital ID since my last post. This is the new digital Veterans ID where people can prove they served in the military to get certain benefits.
I would also recommend giving Iain Davis’ article on the Brit Card a look (linked above), where he argues that the Brit Card is a distraction (politically untenable) from the real digital ID that is/will be introduced.
We should still continue to make our voices heard against all forms of digital ID. I know I haven’t done many protests recently but I plan to continue being involved in this campaign where possible.
Smallpox vaccination, as practiced for most of the 19th century, was an exercise in filth spreading. It was done via arm to arm vaccination, that is by raising a pustule on one person’s arm and then using that pustule to vaccinate other people in a long chain of vaccinations which went back to an original vaccination with cow pus. This led to a significant spread of disease and vaccine death – that could be covered up by ignoring the source of the disease.
Syphilis
One disease that was spread during the practice of vaccination was syphilis.
It was of course known in the 19th century that syphilis could be spread by sexual activity and could be passed from mother to child (congenital syphilis). Over time, it became more and more obvious that vaccination could also spread syphilis, although this was denied by the authorities for many years.
Statistical evidence pointed to the increase in death from syphilis among young children under compulsory vaccination in the United Kingdom. In 1847, before compulsory vaccination, the number of deaths was 255 in England for children under 1 year. By 1884, the number of deaths had increased to 1733. The number shows a steady increase over this time period.
[Table from Creighton’s Cowpox and Vaccinal Syphilis]
There were also several anecdotes that demonstrated the possibility of syphilis after vaccination. P. A. Taylor cites cases where multiple people were given syphilis by vaccination from the same vaccinifer, for example a case where 29 out of 38 children vaccinated contracted syphilis.
Infant syphilis deaths were covered up by blaming the mother’s alleged immorality.
Tuberculosis
Tuberculosis, or consumption, was a common cause of death in the 19th century.
In the UK and Europe, consumption caused widespread public concern during the 19th and early 20th centuries. It was seen as an endemic disease of the urban poor. By 1815 it was the cause of one in four deaths in England. Up from 20% in 17th century London. In Europe, rates of tuberculosis began to rise; in the early 1600s and peaked in the 1800s when it also accounted for nearly 25% of all deaths. Between 1851 and 1910 in England and Wales four million died from consumption. More than one-third of those fatalities were aged 15 to 34; half of those aged 20 to 24, giving Consumption the name the robber of youth.
Anti-vaccinationists suspected that one of the reasons that it was so prominent was vaccination.
In all European armies, vaccination is the order of the day. On their arrival with their corps, the young soldiers are forthwith carefully revaccinated. Now, the military statistics of all countries show an enormous proportion of various forms of tuberculosis among soldiers, especially during the first and second year after their enlistment. […] To sum up, the young soldiers find with their corps material conditions of life, which, for a very large number, are superior to those of their native surroundings. […] Whence then can come these attacks of tuberculosis, so sudden, so numerous, upon subjects that, but a few months before, the council of revision rightly declared to be fit for service.
Some also believed that because cattle can be subject to tuberculosis, the ‘glycerinated calf lymph’ method of extracting vaccine matter (infecting a cow with smallpox and then extracting the matter) might pose a risk.
Leprosy
The spread of leprosy via vaccination was significant mainly in imperial possessions. As colonialism was widespread in the 19th century, one of the items imposed and cajoled onto the native populations was vaccination.
William Tebb describes the situation in Hawaii regarding leprosy. He states that it was completely unknown prior to the introduction of vaccination, but since vaccination was introduced it had spread:
In a leading article on “The Nature of Leprosy” The Lancet, July 30th, 1881, p. 186, says :—” The great Importance of the subject of the nature and mode of extension of leprosy is evident from the steady increase in certain countries into which it has been introduced. In the Sandwich Islands [i.e. Hawaii], for instance, the disease was unknown forty years ago, and now a tenth part of the inhabitants are lepers. In Honolulu, at one time quite free, there are not less than two hundred and fifty cases.”
He goes into detail about how leprosy is spread, showing that while it is not spread by casual contact, it can be spread via inoculation or anything involving piercing the skin. He gives numerous examples of leprosy caused by vaccination and travelled to multiple countries in order to investigate the issue. He found cases not just in Hawaii but also India, South Africa, and other countries. Some cases had the first symptoms at the site of vaccination.
Conclusion
Vaccination was a proven method to spread diseases in the nineteenth century, and in fact, could spread much worse diseases than smallpox (since smallpox either resulted in recovery or death in most cases, whereas these other diseases often led to a slow increase in symptoms). As such the idea that vaccination was a life saver was fatally flawed.
2021 has been the year in which human beings have been subjected to the most intensive, most obsessive, and most outright nonsensical propaganda campaign in human history.
So how has that propaganda campaign held up in 2022? Fortunately, it has has been forced onto the back foot, at least to a degree. There have been victories against the narrative here in the UK, such as the NHS ‘vaccine’ mandate being rejected, the care home worker mandate being repealed, and no more lockdowns. Over here at least, there is only a small percentage of people still wearing a mask, and although the media does its best to fearmonger about Covid, people aren’t buying it any more.
On December 19, the most recent date for which reliable figures are available, just 14 Stoke-on-Trent residents were vaccinated – with one person receiving a first dose, three getting second doses and 10 booster or third doses.
There are, of course, still covid fanatics out there but they are becoming a minority.
The Bad News
There are however, new threats on the horizon. As I have said before, the point of the Official Covid Narrative is not the narrative itself. The point is to use the narrative to drive in an authoritarian, technocratic, transhumanist mass surveillance dystopia via digital IDs, Smart Cities, and Central Bank Digital Currencies. They can do this without Covid, for example, through narratives of ‘saving the planet’ or terrorism (the main narrative used to push mass surveillance prior to the Covid scam).
One of these threats is currently being pushed in Oxford:
Road blocks stopping most motorists from driving through Oxford city centre will divide the city into six “15-minute” neighbourhoods, a county council travel chief has said.
While this will be promoted as ‘saving the planet’ it is actually a form of controlling people’s movements, and will be used to normalise checkpoints through which you cannot pass if you are not the ‘right’ kind of person (whether that’s to do with ‘carbon credits’, ‘vaccination’ status, or political opinion) no doubt connected to one’s digital identity.
But there is something even more important that is worthy of discussion. The horror from this year can be summed up in two words:
Died Suddenly.
Those two words used to normalise mass deaths from the mRNA injections.
So let’s talk about died suddenly. ‘Died Suddenly’ is, in a large percentage of cases, a media euphemism for mRNA injection induced death. This largely but not entirely replaces its previous role as a euphemism for the manner of death for those that have killed themselves.
We have plausible mechanisms of mRNA ‘vaccine’ induced death. Even governments have admitted that these injections can damage the heart.Blood clots are another harm admitted by the establishment. There is significant evidence of myocarditis, pericarditis, stroke, blood clots, cardiac arrest, and heart attacks being caused by the injections – and these can lead to death.
So we have our deaths, our correlations, our mechanisms. But what I wanted to get to was the tsunami of news stories about those who ‘died suddenly’.
For the last few months, I have been working on the ‘In Memoriam of those who ‘died suddenly” project as started by Mark Crispin Miller. The project is a long compilation of deaths all around the world, posted every week, of those who ‘died suddenly’, often with no cause of death listed, or from the above listed causes that often indicate that ‘vaccination’ was involved in the death. As a result, every day I am searching for evidence of people who ‘died suddenly’ for this project.
I have my reasons for taking on this burden of death – to document this crime-in-progress of mRNA ‘vaccine’ mass murder, and other reasons and motivations I won’t get into. My experience doing this project is that it is everywhere. I focus mainly on countries with Russian-language media and Asian countries as well as the UK to a degree, but cases of people dying suddenly pop up from all over the world – either with no cause of death, or the telltale ‘cardiac arrest’, ‘blood clots’ or ‘stroke’ listed.
While the cases of young people dying of these conditions – which rarely affect them normally – are the most striking evidence of mRNA murder – we should not lose sight of the fact that this is a truly universal phenomenon. Male, female, black, white, Asian, old, young, middle aged, Western, Eastern – none of this matters. There are people in all these categories who have been killed.
People who aren’t watching this as closely as I am may not grasp the full implications of what we are witnessing. I’d like to offer some observations based on the reports I have found over the last four months:
Heart Attacks and Cardiac Arrest seem to be rampant in the 40-65 age demographic. Perhaps a slightly overlooked fact, given the more shocking cases among under 30s and sometimes teenagers.
There are a large amount of videos of people just dropping dead. Particularly from India. They are doing a normal activity like dancing and just drop.
There’s also a large amount of testimony of people just collapsing, having been fine the moment before, for example, I have found Russians dropping dead at bus stops.
I don’t believe we are getting anywhere near close to the death toll with the ‘Died Suddenly’ project. Obviously, a large number of cases are never reported anywhere. But even on top of that, there must be news articles that are never found that belong in the project. Most of the Russian ones are reported on local news media websites, for example. If one had the time to check Russian-language local news media across the whole country I reckon a lot more deaths would crop up. But no-one can feasibly manage that. Plus there’s cases excluded from the project due to ambiguity about the cause of death that may have been ‘vaccine’ related.
None of the media in any of the countries I have researched acknowledge there is even a problem, with the exception of India. Indian articles will sometimes state ‘There have been a large number of heart attacks recently’, or, ‘There have been a lot of people dying suddenly dancing at weddings, etc.’ In most cases they don’t blame the ‘vaccine’ but I have seen a couple of examples where the journalist, or who the journalist is quoting, question the ‘vaccine’.
The media is trying to blame anything but the ‘vaccine’ for these deaths, when it does acknowledge that the death was unusual more specifically. Blaming Covid is one strategy, blaming cold weather (or other random factors) for heart attacks instead of the ‘vaccine’ is another strategy. The nebulous ‘Sudden Adult Death Syndrome’ is another one.
When this fails the media accuses ‘anti-vaxxers’ of ‘weaponising’ the deaths of famous people by asking questions. I remember reading one comment that referred to us as ‘grave robbers’, showing disrespect to the deceased. Of course the true disrespect to the deceased is to refuse to ask these questions about what may have killed them.
Being honest, I don’t think this situation is going to improve, I think it will continue or get worse. Even if all ‘vaccination’ stops now, too many people have been damaged, as Dr. Peter McCullough has outlined, with subclinical heart damage that will lead to sudden death. This is where they have led us, where they watch the people that trusted them die. Us dissenters who did not take the injections – unless they resort to more extreme methods – are going to live, but what are we going to live with?
Russia has pursued similar coronavirus policies to the West, including lockdowns and mass ‘vaccination’. Russia developed its own jab, Sputnik V, which is similar to the AstraZeneca ‘vaccine’. Russians, however, proved more reluctant to get jabbed than their Western counterparts. Russian vaccination rates have not gone above 60%, and even achieving this level of coverage required coercive measures. Russian regions imposed vaccine passports and no-jab-no-job policies.
When these toxic jabs are given out, ‘died suddenly’ cases inevitably follow. ‘Died Suddenly’ has become a very common phrase in articles covering deaths and obituaries. Compilers such as Mark Crispin Miller have been documenting these cases as a means to expose the jabs and document the crime-in-progress of giving these experimental injections. As Russia has no equivalent of VAERS or Yellow Card for reporting of jab injuries, good information on this is even harder to get than in the West. Cases of Russian ‘vaccine’-injury are also mostly behind a language barrier for Western audiences. Hence there has been very little coverage of the problems of Sputnik in the West, outside of Riley Waggaman and Miller’s weekly compilations.
Russian compilers have been working to expose possible/probable jab deaths, one example is this document ‘114 Doctors’ about sudden death among medical professionals. It looks as if it was compiled by the website Stop Vaczism, which was shut down at its original web address (which means all the links in the 114 doctors document to this website are unfortunately broken). This document offers a translation of the Russian text, which will be split into 2 parts. The purpose of this translation will be a) to provide more information on sudden death cases in Russia to an English-speaking audience and b) to combat the narrative put out by some individuals in the independent media – mostly those more sympathetic to some of Russia’s foreign policy positions – that Sputnik V is safe.
A note on the data: cases are in age order, starting from the youngest, and some have more data listed than others. Many of these are listed as sudden Covid-19 deaths by the authorities, others are deaths from known jab side effects (such as blood clots). Some are the ‘unknown cause of death’ we have got used to seeing over the past 18 months.
Acronyms, mostly used in the profession category:
GBUZ: State Budgetary Healthcare Institution.
MBUZ: Municipal Budgetary Healthcare Institution
CO, VO etc: First letter stands for the name of the region, second letter for the word ‘region’.
GMU: State Medical University
FGBOU: Federal State-Funded Educational Institution of Higher Education.
Any errors in translation are my own.
Anyone is free to republish this translation with a link back to this page.
Cases 58-114:
Case 58
Name: Alexander Vasilevich Paramonov
Age: 63
Region: Samarskaya
City: Syzran’
Condition: Dead
Date of Death: 28/09/2021
Profession: Doctor – obstetrics and gynecology of women’s consultation at GBUZ CO Syzran’ TsGB.
Cause of Death: Official cause of death is due to a breakaway blood clot.
Further Information: On the 28th September 2021 in the city of Syzran’ in Samarskaya region, 63-year-old Alexander Vasilevich Paramonov, a doctor of obstetrics and gynecology of women’s consultation at GBUZ CO Syzran’ TsGB, died suddenly. He died in the covid hospital, where he was hospitalised for novel coronavirus infection (Covid-19).
Case 59
Name: Tatiana Nikolaevna Giniaytova
Age: 63
Date of Birth: 19/04/1968
Region: Sverdlovskaya
City: Nizhnii Tagil
Condition: Dead
Date of Death: 26/11/2021
Profession: Midwife, stand in for obstetrician-gynecologist of the highest category, obstetrician-gynecologist at women’s service GAUZ SO ‘GB no 1 in the city of Nizhnii Tagil.’
Cause of Death: Official cause of death is coronavirus infection
Further Information: On the 26th November in the city of Nizhnii Tagil in Sverdlovskaya region, 63-year-old Tatiana Nikolaevna Giniaytova, midwife, stand in for obstetrician-gynecologist of the highest category, obstetrician-gynecologist at women’s service GAUZ SO ‘GB no 1 in the city of Nizhnii Tagil’, died suddenly.
Case 60
Name: Marina Borisovna Slutskaya
Age: 64
Date of Birth: 02/09/1956
Region: Moscow
City: Moscow
‘Vaccine’: EpiVacKorona
Condition: Dead
Date of Most Recent ‘Vaccination’: 08/07/2021
Date of Death: 08/08/2021
Time After ‘Vaccination’: 30 days
Profession: Doctor
Further Information: On the 8th August 2021, vaccinated 64-year-old Marina Borisovna Slutskaya died. On the 08/07/2021 she received her second ‘vaccine’ against coronavirus, and began to feel worse after 4 days. As written on social media by Dmitrii Drobyshevsky, “Today Mura is gone, a good person from our group.”
Case 61
Name: Pavel Lvovich Polyeshaev
Age: 64
Region: Khabarovskii
City: Komsomolsk in Amur
Condition: Dead
Date of Most Recent ‘Vaccination’: 07/07/2021
Date of Death: 09/07/2021
Time After ‘Vaccination’: 2 days
Profession: Ambulance doctor
Cause of Death: Official cause of death is kidney failure.
Further Information: In Komsomolsk in Amur an emergency doctor, Pavel Lvovich Polyeshaev, was vaccinated on the 7th July, and on the 9th July he died. This summer was his last. Pavel was 64 years old. Medics came straight to him in an ambulance. This was on 7 July, and his temperature had risen to 40 degrees, and his kidneys failed. And the person died, the doctor died.
Case 62
Name: Igor Vasilevich Ushakov
Age: 64
Date of Birth: 25/09/1957
Region: Irkutskaya
City: Irkutsk
Condition: Dead
Date of Death: 22/11/2021
Profession: Lead doctor at OGAUZ Irkutsk Regional Clinical Consultative-Diagnostic Centre, degree in medical science, President NO ‘Diagnostic Medical Association’.
Cause of Death: Official cause of death is coronavirus infection
Further Information: On the 22nd November in Irkutsk 64 year old Igor Vasilevich Ushakov, lead doctor at OGAUZ Irkutsk Regional Clinical Consultative-Diagnostic Centre, degree in medical science, President NO ‘Diagnostic Medical Association’, died suddenly from coronavirus.
Case 63
Name: Irina Borisovna Gorokhova
Age: 65
Date of Birth: 06/03/1956
Region: Yaroslavskaya
City: Rybinsk
Condition: Dead
Date of Death: 02/07/2021
Profession: Paediatric lead at Rybinsk wing of the Yaroslav medical college
Further Information: On the 2nd July 2021, in Rybinsk in Yaroslav region 65-year-old Irina Borisovna Gorokhova, paediatric lead at Rybinsk wing of the Yaroslav medical college, died suddenly. The website of the Yaroslav Medical College did not even post an obituary. According to local residents she died after ‘vaccination’.
Case 64
Name: Ludmila Ivanovna Bezcmertnikh
Age: 65
Date of Birth: 05/02/1956
Region: Moskovskaya
City: Lotoshina
‘Vaccine’: Sputnik V
Condition: Dead
Date of Death: 25/08/2021
Profession: Deputy to the lead doctor with expertise on temporal disability GBUZ MO Lotoshina TsRB
Further Information: On the 25th August in Lotoshino in Moskovskaya region, 65-year-old Ludmila Ivanovna Bezcmertnikh, deputy to the lead doctor with expertise on temporal disability GBUZ MO Lotoshina TsRB, suddenly died. No cause of death was reported.
Case 65
Name: Vladimir Grigorevich Pravdin
Age: 65
Date of Birth: 25/06/1956
Region: Vologodskaya
City: Cherepovets
Condition: Dead
Date of Death: 03/11/21
Profession: Highly-qualified rheumatologist, Doctor of functional diagnostics BUZ VO Cherepovets City Polyclinic No.2.
Cause of Death: Official cause of death is coronavirus infection.
Further Information: On the 3rd November at the mono-hospital in Cherepovets in Vologodskaya region, the 65-year-old highly-qualified rheumatologist, doctor of functional diagnostics at BUZ VO Cherepovets City Polyclinic No.2 Vladimir Grigorevich Pravdin, died suddenly from novel coronavirus infection.
Case 66
Name: Pyotr Ivanovich Romanyuk
Age: 66
Date of Birth: 18/06/1955
Region: Moskovskaya
City: Mikulino
Condition: Dead
Date of Death: 14/10/21
Profession: Merited doctor of the Russian Federation, lead doctor at GBUZ MO ‘MOPB-12’, chairman of the Council of Deputies, honourable resident of the city region of Lotoshino. 19th March 2021 he was elected to the regional secretary of United Russia party.
Further Information: On the 14th October in Mikulino in Lotoshinsky of Moscow region, merited doctor of the Russian Federation, lead doctor at GBUZ MO ‘MOPB-12’, chairman of the Council of Deputies, honourable resident of the city region of Lotoshino, 66-year-old Pyotr Ivanovich Romanyuk died suddenly.
Case 67
Name: Iraida Albertovna Ryazanova
Age: 66
Date of Birth: 29/09/1954
Region: Chelyabinskaya
City: Kopeisk
Condition: Dead
Date of Death: 31/08/2021
Profession: Paediatrician, nurse at the department at Dundisha GBUZ City Children’s Polyclinic No.1 in the city of Kopeisk.
Further Information: On the 31 August in the Covid ward in Kopeisk in Chelyabinskaya, a paediatrician and nurse at the department at Dundisha GBUZ City Children’s Polyclinic No.1 in the city of Kopeisk, 66-year-old Iraida Albertovna Ryazanova died suddenly of novel coronavirus infection.
Case 68
Name: Mikhail Mikhailovich Levsha
Age: 66
Region: Primorskii
City: Nakhodka
Condition: Dead
Date of Death: 03/11/2021
Profession: Anesthetist in the highest category SP at Children’s Hospital No. 2 KGBUZ Nakhodka City Hospital
Further Information: On the 3rd November 2021 in the city of Nakhodka, an anesthetist in the highest category SP at Children’s Hospital No. 2 KGBUZ Nakhodka City Hospital, 66-year-old Mikhail Mikhailovich Levsha, died suddenly.
Case 69
Name: Valerii Arkadevich Ogorodov
Age: 66
Date of Birth: 06/08/1955
Region: Permskii
City: Aleksandrovsk
Condition: Dead
Date of Death: 17/10/2021
Profession: Divisional doctor at the outpatient clinic at region of Karyer Isvestyak GBUZ PK Alexandrovsk TsGB
Further Information: On the 17th October in Aleksandrovsk in Perm region 66-year-old Valerii Arkadevich Ogorodov, a divisional doctor at the outpatient clinic at region of Karyer Isvestyak GBUZ PK Alexandrovsk TsGB, died suddenly.
Case 70
Name: Valerii Ivanovich Sovalkin
Age: 66
Date of Birth: 07/11/1955
Region: Omskaya
City: Omsk
Condition: Dead
Date of Death: 05/12/2021
Profession: Prorector of Postgraduate Education, lead chair of hospital medicine and endocrinology, doctor of medical science, professor FGBOU VO ‘OmGMU Ministry of Health of Russia’
Further Information: On the 5th December 2021 in Omsk, 66-year-old Valerii Ivanovich Sovalkin, Prorector of Postgraduate Education, lead chair of hospital medicine and endocrinology, doctor of medical science, professor FGBOU VO ‘OmGMU Ministry of Health of Russia’, died suddenly.
Case 71
Name: Olga Petrovna Barkovskaya
Age: 66
Region: Chelyabinskaya
City: Chelyabinsk
Condition: Dead
Date of Death: 12/10/2021
Profession: Psychiatrist, deputy lead doctor at the medical part of GBUZ ‘regional clinical specialist psychiatric hospital no. 1’
Further Information: On the 12th October 2021 in Chelyabinsk 66-year-old Olga Petrovna Barkovskaya, psychiatrist and deputy lead doctor at the medical part of GBUZ ‘regional clinical specialist psychiatric hospital no. 1’ died suddenly.
Case 72
Name: Valentina Vasilevna Krylova
Age: 67
Date of Birth: 11/04/1954
Region: Irkutskaya
City: Taishet
Condition: Dead
Profession: Major of internal service, boss of the infirmary Taishet SIZO No. 3.
Further Information: On the 2nd August 2021 in the hospital at the city of Angarsk in Irkutskaya, 67-year-old resident of Taishet Valentina Vasilevna Krylova, a doctor, major of internal service and boss of the infirmary FKU ‘SIZO-3 GUFSIN Russia in Irkutsk region’, died suddenly from covid.
Case 73
Name: Viktor Petrovich Tsimbayuk
Age: 67
Date of Birth: 24/02/1954
Region: Ulyanovskaya
City: Dimitrovgrad
Condition: Dead
Date of Death: 10/11/2021
Profession: Surgeon at KB No.172 department FGBU ‘FNKTsRiO’ FMBA of Russia
Further Information: In Dimitrovgrad in Ulyanovsk 67-year-old Viktor Petrovich Tsimbayuk, surgeon at KB No.172 department FGBU ‘FNKTsRiO’ FMBA of Russia, suddenly died of novel coronavirus infection.
Case 74
Name: Alexander Minevsky
Age: 67
Region: Rostovskaya
City: Taganrog
Condition: Dead
Date of Death: 19/03/2021
Profession: Lead doctor at the Centre for Medical Rehabilitation no. 1
Further Information: On the night of 19th March 2021 in Taganrog of Rostov region, 67-year-old Alexander Minevsky, lead doctor at the Centre for Medical Rehabilitation no. 1, suddenly died. It was written in commentaries that he died of a heart attack after his second dose of the ‘vaccination’. It is known that the medic had recently had a coronavirus infection.
Cause of Death: Official cause of death is coronavirus infection.
Further Information: On the 13th October 2021 in the city of Solikamsk in Perm region, 67 year old Valerii Vasilevich Tailashev, a trauma orthopaedist and surgeon at the inpatient facility GBUZ PK Solikamsk TsPB, died suddenly. The reason for his death is not named, but according to comments he died from novel coronavirus infection.
Case 76
Name: Vladislav Viktorovich Lonsky
Age: 67
Date of Birth: 05/01/1954
Region: Orenburgskaya
City: Orenburg
Condition: Dead
Date of Death: 05/08/2021
Profession: Otolaryngologist, doctor of the highest category, degree in medical science, merited doctor of the Russian Federation, GAUZ Orenburg Regional Clinical Hospital
Cause of Death: He fell ill a week after taking the first dose of the ‘vaccine’.
Further Information: On the 5th August 2021 in Orenburg, Vladislav Viktorovich Lonsky, 67, an otolaryngologist, doctor of the highest category, degree in medical science, merited doctor of the Russian Federation, GAUZ Orenburg Regional Clinical Hospital died of coronavirus.
Case 77
Name: Antonina Ivanovna Grekova
Age: 67
Date of Birth: 14/02/1953
Region: Smolenskaya
City: Smolensk
Condition: Dead
Date of Death: 07/10/2021
Profession: Degree in medical science, merited doctor of the Russian Federation, reader, Infection specialist OGBUZ ‘KB no. 1’, lead at the department of infectious diseases in children FGBOU VO SGMU MZ of Russia.
Cause of Death: Official cause of death is coronavirus infection
Further Information: On the 7th October in the infection department of the clinical hospital of Smolensk, 67-year-old Antonina Ivanovna Grekova, degree in medical science, merited doctor of the Russian Federation, reader, Infection specialist OGBUZ ‘KB no. 1’, lead at the department of infectious diseases in children, died suddenly from coronavirus.
Case 78
Name: Fyodor Fadeyevich Filippov
Age: 68
Date of Birth: 02/02/1953
Region: Sevastopol
City: Sevastopol
Condition: Dead
Date of Death: 04/08/2021
Time after ‘Vaccination’: 0 days
Profession: Urologist at OOO ‘Medical-Sevastopol’
Further Information: In Sevastopol 68-year-old Fyodor Fadeyevich Filippov, a urologist at OOO ‘Medical-Sevastopol’, suddenly died. According to residents, he died several hours after ‘vaccination’. On the website of OOO ‘Medical-Sevastopol’ there isn’t even an obituary for this famous Sevastopol doctor who served 44 years in medicine.
Case 79
Name: Vasilii Alexandrovich Laktanov
Age: 68
Region: Moskovskaya
City: Orekhovo-Zuevo
Condition: Dead
Date of Death: 29/11/2021
Profession: Trauma Orthopaedist at GBUZ MO ‘Orekhovo-Zuevo TsGB’, OOO Clinic of New Medicine
Further Information: On the 29th November 2021 in city of Orekhovo-Zuevo in Moskovskaya region, 68-year-old Vasilii Alexandrovich Laktanov, a trauma orthopaedist at GBUZ MO ‘Orekhovo-Zuevo TsGB’, OOO Clinic of New Medicine, suddenly died. In commentaries it was written that his cause of death was cancer.
Case 80
Name: Tatiana Vasilevna Zhdannikova
Age: 68
Region: Khabarovskii
City: Mariinsckii Reid
Condition: Dead
Date of Death: 04/12/2021
Profession: Nurse at the Reid department of KGBUZ ‘Ulchckaya regional hospital’, veteran of labour
Cause of Death: Official cause of death is coronavirus infection
Further Information: On the 4th October in Mariinskii Reid in the Ulchskaya region of Kharabovskii, 68-year-old Tatiana Vasilevna Zhdannikova, a nurse at the Reid department of KGBUZ ‘Ulchckaya regional hospital’ and veteran of labour, died suddenly from novel coronavirus infection.
Case 81
Name: Viktor Konstantinovich Alesenko
Age: 69
Region: Primorskii
City: Nakhodka
Condition: Dead
Date of Death: 14/09/2021
Profession: Honoured health defender of the Russian Federation, Obstetrician and Gynecologist in the highest category SP ‘City Hospital No. 1’ KGBUZ Nakhodka City Hospital. Viktor Alesenko headed the gynecological department for 11 years.
Further Information: On the 14th September 2021 in the city of Nakhodka in Primorskii region 69-year-old honoured health defender of the Russian Federation, Obstetrician and Gynecologist in the highest category SP ‘City Hospital No. 1’ KGBUZ Nakhodka City Hospital, Viktor Konstantinovich Alesenko, died suddenly.
Case 82
Name: Tatiana Alexandrovna Solodkova
Age: 69
Region: Samarskaya
City: Syzran’
Condition: Dead
Date of Death: 24/09/2021
Profession: Doctor of the highest category, Obstetrician & Gynecologist, leader of women’s consultations at GBUZ SO Syzran’ City Hospital No.2′ After several days of Covid-19 her spouse died.
Cause of Death: Official cause of death is coronavirus infection.
Further Information: On the 24th September 2021 in the Covid hospital in Syzran’ in Samarskaya region, 69-year-old Tatiana Alexandrovna Solodkova, a doctor of the highest category, obstetrician & gynecologist, leader of women’s consultations at GBUZ SO Syzran’ City Hospital No.2′, died suddenly from Covid-19.
Case 83
Name: Nikolai Viktorovich Menkov
Age: 70
Date of Birth: 18/07/1951
Region: Nizhegorodskaya
City: Nizhnii Novgorod
Condition: Dead
Date of Death: 24/08/2021
Profession: Lead Pulmonary Specialist in Nizhegorodskaya region, pulmonary specialist, degree in medical science, reader at the department of preliminary studies on medical diseases NizhGMA
Cause of Death: Official cause of death is coronavirus infection
Further Information: On the 24th August in the city of Nizhnii Novgorod, 70-year-old Nikolai Viktorovich Menkov, Lead Pulmonary Specialist in Nizhegorodskaya region, pulmonary specialist, degree in medical science, reader at the department of preliminary studies on medical diseases NizhGMA, died suddenly from coronavirus infection.
Case 84
Name: Lyudmila Grigorevna Bondarchuk
Age: 70
Region: Sverdlovskaya
City: Yekaterinburg
Condition: Dead
Date of Death: 01/11/2021
Profession: Doctor of the highest category, cosmetic dermatologist at the polyclinic 3 Shinnom factory GAUZ SO central city hospital no. 20.
Cause of Death: official cause of death is coronavirus infection.
Further Information: On 1st November 2021 in the city of Yekaterinburg, 70-year-old Lyudmila Grigorevna Bondarchuk, a doctor of the highest category, cosmetic dermatologist at the polyclinic 3 Shinnom factory GAUZ SO central city hospital no. 20, suddenly died from complications of Covid 19.
Case 85
Name: Sergei Andreevich Perov
Age: 70
Region: Perm
City: Solikamsk
Condition: Dead
Date of Death: 23/09/2021
Profession: Trauma orthopaedist leader at the trauma point GBUZ PK City hospital in the city of Solikamsk
Further Information: On the 23rd of September 2021, in Solikamsk in Perm region, 70-year-old Sergei Andreevich Perov, a trauma orthopaedist and leader at the trauma point at GBUZ PK City hospital in the city of Solikamsk, died suddenly. No cause of death was given.
Case 86
Name: Tatiana Alexandrovna Ovsyannikova
Age: 71
Date of Birth: 12/09/1950
Region: Sverdlovskaya
City: Nizhnii Tagil
Condition: Dead
Date of Death: 20/10/2021
Profession: Doctor of the highest category, doctor at UZI, Obstetrician & gynecologist at women’s consultation office GAUZ SO ‘GB no.1 in the city of Nizhnii Tagil’
Cause of Death: Official cause of death is coronavirus infection.
Further Information: On the 20th October 2021, in the city of Nizhnii Tagil in Sverdlovsk region, 71-year-old Tatiana Alexandrovna Ovsyannikova, doctor of the highest category, doctor at UZI, Obstetrician & gynecologist at women’s consultation office GAUZ SO ‘GB no.1 in the city of Nizhnii Tagil’, died suddenly from Covid-19.
Case 87
Name: Nikolai Vasilevich Filippov
Age: 71
Date of Birth: 15/12/1949
Region: Volgogradskaya
City: Volgograd
Condition: Dead
Date of Death: 03/11/2021
Profession: Famous scientist with a large amount of experience in practical work in a vet’s in Volgogradskaya region, veterinarian, Doctor of Veterinary Science, professor at the department of infectious pathology and forensic veterinary medicine FGOU VPO Vologogradskaya GSKhA.
Cause of Death: Official cause of death is coronavirus infection
Further Information: On the 3rd November at the Infection hospital at the base of hospital no.4
Case 88
Name: Tatiana Petrovna Khodyreva
Age: 71
Date of Birth: 23/09/1950
Region: Perm
City: Berezniki
‘Vaccine’: Sputnik V
Condition: Dead
Date of Death: 25/10/2021
Profession: Radiographer at KDO ‘KB named for academic E. A. Vagner.
Cause of Death: Official cause of death is coronavirus infection
Further Information: on the 25/10/2021 in Berezniki in Perm region the Sputnik-‘vaccinated’ 71-year-old Tatiana Petrovna Khodyreva, a radiographer at KDO ‘KB named for academic E. A. Vagner, died suddenly from Covid-19.
Case 89
Name: Mikhail Viktorovich Zhivotovskii
Age: 72
Region: Nizhegorodskaya
City: Nizhnii Novgorod
‘Vaccine’: KoviVac
Condition: Dead
Date of Death: 21/07/2021
Time after ‘Vaccination’: 21 days.
Profession: Doctor, paediatric infection specialist, lead at the department GBUZ NO Infection Clinical Hospital No. 23 in the city of Nizhnii Novgorod
Cause of Death: Official cause of death is coronavirus infection
Further Information: On the 21st July in the city of Nizhnii Novgorod, 72-year-old Mikhail Viktorovich Zhivotovskii, a paediatric infection specialist and lead at the department GBUZ NO Infection Clinical Hospital No. 23 in the city of Nizhnii Novgorod, died suddenly from Covid-19.
Case 90
Name: Alexander Pavlovich Medvedev
Age: 72
Date of Birth: 01/07/1949
Region: Nizhegorodskaya
City: Nizhnii Novgorod
Condition: Dead
Date of Death: 23/10/2021
Profession: Doctor, original scientist, Doctor of Medical Science, heart surgeon, professor, lead at the department of hospital surgery named for B A Korolyov FGBOU VO PIMU
Cause of Death: Official cause of death is coronavirus infection.
Further Information: On the 23 October 2021 in the city of Nizhnii Novgorod, 72-year-old Alexander Pavlovich Medvedev, an original scientist, Doctor of Medical Science, heart surgeon, professor and lead at the department of hospital surgery named for B A Korolyov, died suddenly from Covid-19.
Cause of Death: Official cause of death is coronavirus infection
Further Information: On the 8th November 2021 in Syzran’ in Saratov region 72 year old Vera Ivanovna Teryokhina, a paediatrician at GBUZ Syzran’ City Polyclinic – Children’s polyclininc no. 1, died suddely from coronavirus infection.
Case 92
Name: Yevgenia Petrovna Kochetova
Age: 74
Region: Samarskaya
City: Novokuibyshevsk
Reason for ‘Vaccination’: Mandate
Condition: Dead
Date of Death: 11/09/2021
Time after ‘Vaccination’: 45 days
Profession: Paeditrician at GBUZ SO Novokuibyshevsk TsGB
Cause of Death: Official cause of death is pneumonia and thrombosis
Further Information: On 11/09/2021 in Novokuibyshevsk in Samarskaya region 74 year old Yevgenia Petrovna Kochetova, a paeditrician at GBUZ SO Novokuibyshevsk TsGB, died suddenly one and a half months after her second dose of the ‘vaccine’ of pneumonia and thrombosis.
Case 93
Name: Vladimir Mikhailovich Medvedev
Age: 74
Date of Birth: 09/08/1947
Region: Orenburgskaya
City: Buguruslan
Condition: Dead
Date of Death: 26/08/2021
Profession: Surgeon, lead doctor at MBUZ ‘BTsGB’
Further Information: On the 26/08/2021 in Buguruslan in Orenburgskaya region surgeon Vladimir Mikhailovich Medvedev suddenly died. According to local residents, he died after ‘vaccination’.
Case 94
Name: Nadezhda Konstantinovna Bondareva
Age: 75
Date of Birth: 11/05/1946
Region: Tverskaya
City: Kimry
Condition: Dead
Date of Death: 03/09/2021
Profession: Paediatrician at division of GBUZ TO Kimry Central Regional Hospital – Children’s Polyclinic No. 1
Cause of Death: Official cause of death is coronavirus infection
Further Information: On the 3rd of September in Kimry in Tver region 75-year-old Nadezhda Konstantinovna Bondareva, a paediatrician at division of GBUZ TO Kimry Central Regional Hospital – Children’s Polyclinic No. 1, died suddenly.
Case 95
Name: Alla Nikolayevna
Age: 76
Region: Voronezhskaya
City: Voronezh
‘Vaccine’: Sputnik V
Reason for ‘Vaccination’: Voluntary
Condition: Dead
Dates of ‘Vaccination’: 14/07/2021 & 04/08/2021
Date of Death: 28/09/2021
Time after ‘Vaccination’: 55 days
Profession: Nurse
Cause of Death: Official cause of death is pulmonary edema induced by covid related pneumonia
Further Information: On the 28th August 2021, 55 days after being ‘vaccinated’ with Sputnik, 76-year-old Alla Nikolaevna suddenly died. Alla received her first ‘vaccination’ on the 14th July and her second on 4th August, on 19th September she fell ill with Covid-19. After 10 days pneumonia had eaten 99% of her lungs.
Case 96
Name: Larisa Petrovna Yegorina
Age: 77
Date of Birth: 13/04/1944
Region: Republic of Komi
City: Usinsk
Reason for ‘Vaccination’: Mandate
Condition: Dead
Date of Death: 30/07/2021
Time after ‘Vaccination’: 22 days.
Profession: Physiotherapy Nurse at the Physiotherapy department of GBUZ PK Usinsk Central Regional Hospital.
Further Information: In Usinsk 77-year-old physiotherapy Nurse at the Physiotherapy department of GBUZ PK Usinsk Central Regional Hospital, Larisa Petrovna Yegorina, died from coronavirus 22 days after injection with the experimental ‘vaccine’.
Case 97
Name: Boris Andreyevich Bukovkin
Age: 84
Region: Nizhegorodskaya
City: Nizhnii Novgorod
Condition: Dead
Date of Death: 30/10/2021
Profession: Doctor, Academic surgeon
Cause of Death: Official cause of death is coronavirus infection
Further Information: Let me give you sad news, 30/10/21. A great man, our colleague academic surgeon Boris Andreyevich Bukovkin has died from Covid. He was 84, he was ‘vaccinated’ in the summer.
Case 98
Name: Olga Viktorovna Khodyreva
Age: Unknown
Region: Kirovskaya
City: Kirovo-Chepetsk
‘Vaccine’: Sputnik V
Condition: Dead
Date of Most Recent ‘Vaccination’: 17/07/2021
Date of Death: 30/07/2021
Profession: Kirov region medical worker
Cause of Death: Official cause of death is ischemia
Further Information: Hello. A tragedy happened. On the 30th July 2021, Olga Viktorovna Khodyreva died. On the 17th July she had received her second dose of Sputnik-V. She worked in Kirovo-Chepetsk as a medical worker. The cause of death was cardiac arrest in her sleep, she didn’t have any medical conditions.
Case 99
Name: Igor Yevgenovich Korolyov
Age: Unknown
Region: Moscow
City: Moscow
‘Vaccine’: KoviVac
Condition: Dead
Date of Most Recent ‘Vaccination’: 24/07/2021
Date of Death: 15/08/2021
Time After ‘Vaccination’: 22 days.
Profession: Doctor at the Consultative-Diagnostic Centre No. 2 Department of Health Defense for the City of Moscow
Further Information: Complications begin on 25/07/2021. On 15th August Igor Yevgenovich Korolyov died from ‘vaccination’ – a doctor at the Consultative-Diagnostic Centre No. 2 Department of Health Defense for the City of Moscow. Throughout the pandemic he had worked with covid patients who were taken into hospital.
Case 100
Name: Surname unknown
Age: Unknown
Region: Moscow
City: Moscow
Condition: Dead
Date of Most Recent ‘Vaccination’: 25/06/2021
Date of Death: 26/06/2021
Time After ‘Vaccination’: 1 day.
Profession: Neurologist at the centre of Endo-surgery and Lithotripsy
Further Information: Complications begin 25/06/2021.
Case 101
Name: Yuri Grigorevich Svetlakov
Age: Unknown
Region: Perm
City: Osa
Reasons for ‘Vaccination’: Voluntary
Condition: Dead
Date of Death: 27/06/2021
Time After ‘Vaccination’: 21 days.
Profession: Paediatrician
Further Information: In the city of Osa in Perm region 3 weeks after vaccination, paediatrician Yuri Grigorevich Svetlakov suddenly died. According to his spouse, a week after ‘vaccination’ his autoimmune condition (myasthenia) started to get worse, he suffered cardiac arrest and died 10 days later in a coma in intensive care.
Case 102
Name: Yegor Viktorovich Polin
Age: Unknown
Region: Krasnodarskii
City: Sochi
Reason for ‘Vaccination’: Voluntary
Condition: Dead
Date of Most Recent ‘Vaccination’: 22/06/2021
Date of Death: 02/08/2021
Profession: Doctor as Sochi Hospital No. 4
Further Information: On 02/08/2021 the death of Yegor Viktorovich Polin became known. He worked as a doctor in City Hospital No. 4 in Sochi. On the 22nd June he wrote on his Instagram page that he was ‘vaccinated’. On the 3rd August the hospital website published his obituary.
Case 103
Name: Surname unknown
Age: Unknown
Region: Kursk
City: Kursk
Condition: Dead
Date of Death: 23/11/2021
Profession: Doctor at the Kursk Venereal Disease Dispensary
Cause of Death: More than 90% lung injury, official cause of death is coronavirus.
Further Information: The deputy governor of Kursk Oblast Andrei Beloctotskii told the story of the death of a regional doctor at the venereal disease dispensary in a meeting of the operational staff. He said that she had had two doses of the ‘vaccine’ already in February. More than half a year passed. She recently became ill, her lung function was injured by 90%.
Case 104
Name: Althea Rifkhatovna Ismagilova
Age: Unknown
Region: Republic of Bashkortostan
City: Ufa
Condition: Dead
Date of Death: 20/11/2021
Profession: Paediatrician at the children’s department No. 3 GBUZ RB City Children’s Clinical Hospital No. 17.
Further Information: On the 20th November 2021 in Ufa in the Republic of Bashkortostan, Althea Rifkhatovna Ismagilova, a paediatrician at the children’s department No. 3 GBUZ RB City Children’s Clinical Hospital No. 17, died suddenly.
Case 105
Name: Surname unknown
Age: Unknown
Region: Kaluzhskaya
City: Kaluga
Condition: Dead
Profession: Lead doctor at Kaluzhskaya ambulance service
Further Information: Date of ‘vaccination’: 04/01/2021. Complications begin 08/01/2021. On the evening of the 8th January the lead doctor at Kaluzhskaya ambulance service and trauma doctor Viktoria Kardash died from complications, caused by coronavirus. A few days before she died she was in intensive care with coronavirus.
Case 106
Name: Alexander Anatolevich Stolbov
Age: Unknown
Region: Ulyanovskaya
City: Ulyanovsk
Condition: Dead
Date of Death: 26/02/2021
Profession: Surgeon
Further Information: On the 26th February 2021 surgeon Alexander Anatolevich Stolbov suddenly died alone in the hospital in Podmoskovye. He died a month after taking the experimental Covid-19 injection.
Case 107
Name: Surname unknown
Age: Unknown
Region: Magadanskaya
City: Ola
Condition: Dead
Profession: Paediatrician in the town of Ola
Further Information: Date of ‘vaccination’ was in March 2021. On the 23rd August we heard of the death of a paediatrician in the town of Ola in Magadanskaya region. In March 2021 the doctor had two doses of the ‘vaccination’ and in July they became ill.
Case 108
Name: Alexander Alexandrovich Grigoryev
Age: Unknown
Region: Voronezhskaya
City: Borisoglebsk
Condition: Dead
Date of Death: 06/10/2021
Profession: Doctor of the mobile brigade of the department of the ambulance service BUZ VO Borisoglebsk RB, teacher at medical college.
Cause of Death: Official cause of death is sudden cardiac arrest
Further Information: On the 6th October 2021 in Borisoglebsk in Voronezhskaya region, Alexander Alexandrovich Grigoryev, a doctor of the mobile brigade of the department of the ambulance service BUZ VO Borisoglebsk RB and teacher at medical college, suddenly died.
Case 109
Name: Lyudmila Viktorovna Belova
Age: Unknown
Region: Novgorodskaya
City: Velikii Novgorod
Condition: Dead
Profession: Oncologist
Further Information: A resident of Velikii Novogorod talked about the death of Lyudmila Viktorovna Belova, an oncologist at Regional Clinical Oncological Dispensary in Velikii Novgorod, who died on 08/09/2021 from thrombosis after their second dose of the ‘vaccine’.
Case 110
Name: Lyaisan Yusupova
Age: Unknown
Region: Republic of Bashkortostan
City: Ufa
‘Vaccine’: Sputnik V
Condition: Ill
Profession: Doctor and plastic surgeon
Further Information: Doctor and plastic surgeon Lyaisan Yusupova talked about her battle with coronavirus on social media.
Case 111
Name: Masrut Mazitovich Shamsutdinov
Age: Unknown
Region: Republic of Bashkortostan
City: Sterlitamak
Condition: Dead
Date of Death: 13/08/2021
Profession: Doctor – phthisiatrician, the former lead doctor at GBUZ Sterlitamak Inter Regional Anti-Tuberculosis Dispensary
Cause of Death: Official cause of death is coronavirus infection
Further Information: On the 13th August 2021 in Sterlitamak in the Republic of Bashkortostan, Masrut Mazitovich Shamsutdinov, a phthisiatrician, the former lead doctor at GBUZ Sterlitamak Inter Regional Anti-Tuberculosis Dispensary, died suddenly from Covid-19.
Case 112
Name: Vyacheslav Filippovich Kolyadenko
Age: Unknown
Region: Saratovskaya
City: Saratov
Condition: Dead
Date of Death: 01/08/2021
Profession: Former lead at department of children’s illnesses at Saratov Medical Institute
Further Information: Date of vaccination: in May 2021. On the 1st August 2021 in Saratov the vaccinated Vyacheslav Filippovich Kolyadenko, former lead at department of children’s illnesses at Saratov Medical Institute between 1987 and 2003, died. He graduated from the Saratov Medical Institute in 1964, he worked as a paediatrician in Novosibirsk in 1973.
Case 113
Name: Galina Ivanovna Makarova
Age: Unknown
Region: Republic of Bashkortostan
City: Sterlitamak
Condition: Dead
Date of Death: 18/09/2021
Profession: ENT doctor at GBUZ RB City Hospital No. 2 in the city of Sterlitamak
Cause of Death: Official cause of death is coronavirus infection
Further Information: On the 18th September 2021 in Sterlitamak in the Republic of Bashkortostan, Galina Ivanovna Makarova, an ENT doctor at GBUZ RB City Hospital No. 2 in the city of Sterlitamak, died suddenly from Covid-19
Case 114
Name: Elena Andreyevna Rybalkina
Age: Unknown
Region: Chelyabinskaya
City: Magnitogorsk
Condition: Dead
Date of Death: 07/09/2021
Profession: Dentist at OOO ‘Stomateks’
Cause of Death: Official cause of death is myocardiopathy
Further Information: On the 7th September 2021 in Magnitogorsk in Chelyabinskaya Elena Andreyevna Rybalkina, a dentist at OOO ‘Stomateks’, suddenly died.
The Official Covid Narrative, the idea that Covid-19 is an extremely dangerous disease that requires severe mitigation strategies such as lockdown, views human beings as simply disease carriers. However, some categories of people are viewed more as disease carriers than others by the official narrative, and specifically by the believers in that narrative. The narrative itself is inherently linked to certain middle and upper class attitudes about the working classes and their beliefs and pursuits. This is seen through the demonisation of working class people for carrying out ordinary everyday activities and for being sceptical of big pharma.
The Great Unwashed
From 23 March 2020, near the entirety of the country was compliant with Boris Johnson’s draconian lockdowns. As someone who was a sceptic of the narrative from the beginning, it was depressing and almost hopeless to see the state of the country at that time.
The first possible signs of actual social life came about through the suggestion of V.E. Day anniversary celebrations. 8th May 2020 marked the 75th anniversary of the defeat of Nazi Germany, so at that point the British people had endured about 6 weeks of lockdown. This was the first sign of life in the country since the beginning of the tyranny.
This is when the middle class handwringing started. The idea of celebrating V.E. Day does not suit middle class Remainer sensibilities, as they consider it to be too nationalistic. They already had a negative conception of the ‘insular’ working class who largely voted for Brexit, so they were already psychologically primed for mass demonisation. And now the working class were to commit the mortal sin in the minds of middle class hypochondriacs: going outside to celebrate a holiday.
Furthermore, there were images of packed beaches from the late spring and summer of 2020. The media salivated over these images, mocking and cursing those who went to the beach. This article provides an example of such strategies, entitled ‘Bournemouth raises alarm as huge crowds ignore COVID advice and flock to the coast’. People having a good time in good weather is now considered to be a ‘major incident’.
The Great Unjabbed
Since the rollout of the Covid 19 injections to the population at large, the demonisation has been squarely aimed at the unjabbed. The official narrative had divided the population into two halves: the virtuous ‘fully vaccinated’ (and now ‘boosted’) populations, and the selfish, evil ‘unvaccinated’ who are subhuman vectors of disease.
Leaving the irrationality of this narrative aside for a moment, here is a large dose of snobbery behind the demonisation of the ‘unvaccinated’. The reality is, people from poorer communities and racial minorities are much less likely to have taken the jabs than middle class white people.
Official government data is contested when it comes to how many people have actually taken the jabs. The government likes to cite a figure of 5m ‘unvaccinated’, making the uninjected quite a small minority. The Expose has used another government document to contest this, claiming this document shows that in fact 15.3m eligible people have not taken a single dose.
Even according to the more official data, however, take up is lower in poorer and ethnic minority communities. The website OpenSafely.org gives data on vaccine coverage in the UK (and is linked and used as a source by the BBC, so it’s establishment approved). Their charts clearly show that ethnic minorities and more deprived areas have a lower vaccination take up. Even if the numbers themselves are overshot per The Expose above, I doubt that the trends themselves are inaccurate.
The demonisation of the ‘unvaccinated’ thus has a clear class element.
There is also another aspect to this which we saw strongly during the Brexit argument and that is the ‘working class are stupid’ aspect. The Guardian published an article called ‘Understanding, not judgment, should shape our response to those who remain unjabbed’ which is full of the kind of talking down beloved of middle class British liberals.
By way of getting to the heart of it all, a PowerPoint presentation she sent me made mention of “historic lack of trust in public institutions including health services within some groups and communities”. In some black communities, she said, people’s relationships with authority are so poor that that some have chosen to be vaccinated well away from where they live and work, “because they’re almost embarrassed to be vaccinated, thinking their community isn’t behind them.” She paused. “There’s no easy fix. We just keep on talking.”
The implication of this article is that we need some nice middle class liberals to go and talk to these ‘stupid’ black people who don’t trust authority. There’s no consideration here that people may have actually said no and mean no and have the agency to do so.
This is the flipside to the demonisation of the ‘unvaccinated’ as subhuman – they can either be maliciously subhuman, in that they are purposeful granny killers, or they can be stupidly subhuman, in that they require enlightenment by the evangelists of the Covid Cult.
There is a more serious point to all of this snobbery, which is that the Covid narrative is an attack on ordinary working people in a multitude of ways. This attack is justified through this snobbery in the minds of the petty middle class, who are already inclined to view the working class as ignorant Brexit voters who ruined their nice holidays in Marbella.
Lockdown is a war on the working class. Firstly, it is an attack on the rights of the working class to congregate and organise politically in order to represent their interests, as well as to protest against the governments and corporations imposing poor working conditions and wages on them.
Lockdown is also an economic war against the working class and a massive transfer of wealth upwards from ordinary people. Multiple sources have highlighted this massive growth in wealth, including many that are supporters of the Official Covid Narrative. According to inequality.org:
The world’s billionaires have seen their wealth surge by over $5.5 trillion since the beginning of the pandemic in March 2020, a gain of over 68 percent. The world’s 2,690 global billionaires saw their combined wealth rise from $8 trillion on March 20, 2020 to $13.5 trillion as of July 31, 2021, drawing on data from Forbes.
Global billionaire total wealth has increased more over the past 17 months of the pandemic than it did in the 15 years prior to the pandemic. Between 2006 and 2020, global billionaire wealth increased from $2.65 trillion to $8 trillion, a gain of $5.35 trillion.
With unprecedented support from governments for their economies, the stock market has been booming, driving up billionaire wealth, even while the real economy faces the deepest recession in a century. In contrast, after the financial crisis in 2008, it took five years for billionaire wealth to return to its pre-crisis highs.
Worldwide, billionaires’ wealth increased by a staggering $3.9tn (trillion) between 18 March and 31 December 2020.28 Their total wealth now stands at $11.95tn, which is equivalent to what G20 governments have spent in response to the pandemic. The world’s 10 richest billionaires have collectively seen their wealth increase by $540bn over this period.
Working class wealth has nosedived due to the lockdowns. Workers have been forced to work from home and this has increased their exploitation according to Ted Reese:
Much of the workplace has been moved to the home, saving capital costs on office space; pushing running costs such as electricity and water bills onto workers; and making them work longer hours, all combining to deepen the rate of their exploitation. About 30% of remote workers in a UK survey said they were working more unpaid hours than before lockdown, with 18% reporting at least four additional unpaid hours a week. According to an ADP Research Institute study, employees globally are now working 9.2 hours per week of unpaid overtime on average, up from 7.3 hours in a year.
The terrible inflation we are currently observing – at least partially caused by the lockdowns – is another aspect of war on the working class. The middle classes can weather this inflation through higher wages and the money they accrued while getting paid free cash on furlough. This isn’t an option for the working class.
The mandatory Covid injections implemented by the establishment are also an attack on the bodily integrity of the working class. The government forced care home workers to take these injections or they would be fired. Care home workers are poorly paid members of the working class, with an average wage of £8.50 an hour. They are also primarily women. Care home workers were fired from their jobs for not taking these injections in December 2021, or were forced to leave and find other work. Although the mandate was later repealed the damage was done in terms of lost wages and jobs. Other countries are still implementing such policies.
Snobbery also allows for the demonisation of resistance to the authoritarian project launched in the name of ‘fighting Covid’. This has been seen most notably in the case of the ‘Freedom Convoy’. The Convoy emerged in Canada in response to Justin Trudeau’s particularly authoritarian Covid measures. In response other convoys have taken inspiration for their own movements including in the UK. Due to the fact that this movement is founded by working class people, it has been demonised by people in the media and their woke left allies. The movement has been smeared as ‘white supremacist’ (despite the clear participation of people of all races).
The portion of the left that hates the working classes has also been brought in to smear the convoys as ‘right wing’. One example is previously respected anti-imperialist commentator Ben Norton, who has been demonising people opposed to the injection mandates:
The same line is being parroted by the liberal media that the likes of Norton claim to oppose. The Conversation ran a hit piece on the truckers, claiming that because they aren’t virtue signalling about ‘transphobia’ they don’t care about freedom and that they want the freedom to kill people because they reject mandating an experimental injection. This demonisation helps to keep the middle classes in the Covid propaganda bubble.
Conclusion
One function of lockdowns was a massive transfer of wealth to the rich from the poor and working class. The political acceptability of such a project – in the UK in particular – was maintained through the demonisation of the working classes.
I had a prior appointment so unfortunately was not able to stay to hear all the speakers at the rally but I did want to attend anyway to show my support for the opposition to vaccine mandates etc. I was thus only there between 12.10 and 1.10 so anything that happened outside of those times I didn’t get to see. I still got some pictures and footage to share though from the protest.
The protest was in Chamberlain Square this time and I must say the vibe of the protest was great. I felt a lot of positive energy from the protest in general. Here was the crowd at the time of arrival 12.10:
The crowd did get quite a bit bigger than this.
Around 12.25 a group of NHS workers supporting #NHS100K walked into the rally and you can see the footage below:
Here’s some footage showing the crowd around 12.35 to give an indication of how many were at the protest. While it’s difficult to compare due to the fact that previous protests have taken place in different squares, I think this one was bigger than the previous ones I have attended in Birmingham.
The crowd can be seen in this photo, obviously there were also some people behind me and to the side on the square:
I stayed for the first few speeches. There was quite a few mentions of this Mark Sexton legal case that is being heavily discussed in covid sceptic circles. There was also a press release regarding the case handed out, which said that:
Hugely significant allegations have been made of serious crimes being committed by a number of UK government ministers, civil servants, heads of news networks etc.
[…] The UK’s biggest criminal investigation is now live.
Personally I am a bit sceptical of this, although I will say I have not done a lot of research into the case itself. I am not convinced by the idea that the police, who are part of the corrupt system enforcing the lockdown etc. measures would be willing to investigate that corrupt system.
There was also discussion of NHS100K and the jab mandates. There was also a member of NHS staff who spoke out opposing the mandate:
Interestingly unlike previous anti-lockdown protests there were a few traditional left winger types there. There were two blokes with some Workers’ Party of Britain flags. Previously their party has claimed to attend anti-lockdown actions – I did question this but the tweet seems to have disappeared. Anyway I never saw any of their flags etc. at any previous events I attended. There was also one guy with a placard saying ‘Pro-vaccine, anti-mandatory vaccine’ with a Unison logo.
The Official Covid Narrative – the idea that Covid-19 is such a deadly disease that we all need to change our lives – has always been absurd to anyone who has been paying attention. However, a large number of people in Britain have agreed with the Covid Narrative (to differing degrees), supporting mandatory masks, lockdowns and (voluntary) Covid injections. This article will discuss to what degree the Official Covid Narrative has been stretched to breaking point in the UK and whether the idea of a ‘collapsing narrative’ is realistic.
The Boris Johnson Party Story
The first news story worthy of our attention in this discussion is the ‘scandal’ of Boris Johnson having a party during lockdown restrictions. This story has been simmering since December 2021. Mainstream coverage has put a lot of emphasis on this story over the past two months. For example, we can examine the coverage of the lockdown-loving middle class rag The Guardian on this issue.
Johnson’s appearance at PMQs on Wednesday was his first response to the video, uncovered by ITV, in which his then-press secretary, Allegra Stratton, and other No 10 staff talked jokingly on 22 December last year about a staff party four days earlier, and how media questions about it could be countered.
Another party later emerged, that took place on the eve of the funeral of Prince Philip. Boris Johnson has come out and ‘apologised’ for that party as well. Meanwhile the Guardian is running articles with analysis by “a member of the Sage subcommittee advising on behavioural science”. No, seriously.
Unfortunately, I don’t think it can be convincingly argued that is Boris Johnson incident heralds the collapse of the Covid Narrative. We have already seen this before, first with Dominic Cummings and Neil Ferguson and then with Matt Hancock. Furthermore, the media is still focusing on the same discredited angle with the Johnson story as they were with the Cummings story from over 18 months ago:
The press divided between the lockdown enthusiasts defending him, or the anti-lockdowners eagerly calling him a hypocrite.
Both, again, were missing the point.
[…]
We’re all meant to be “sheltering in place” and “protecting the NHS” and “saving lives” because there is a “deadly virus”. We’re being told this is for our own safety. Because the virus is allegedly dangerous.
When the people giving us these orders do not follow them themselves, they are not showing themselves to be “hypocrites”. They are showing themselves to be liars. They are admitting they don’t really believe what they’re saying.
Labour is trying to portray this inhumane ‘NHS Nurse’ (whether the story is real or not is beside the point) as virtuous because she ‘followed the rules’ and this is meant to rebuke Boris Johnson for not ‘following the rules’. They didn’t get the response they were looking for in the comments, with multiple tweets calling them out for being even more fanatical lockdowners than the Tories.
We must not forget the moral of the ‘Matt Hancock affair’ story when discussing this case. Matt Hancock had become unpopular with the public and so it conveniently came out that he had been having an affair, with photos of him snogging his mistress being slapped all over The Sun. Hancock was a ‘sacrifice’ from within the narrative to save the narrative, by projecting all of the narrative failures on to him as designated scapegoat. Meanwhile his successor, Sajid Javid, has amped up the ‘vaccine’ program with the roll out of jabs to children and the forcing of jabs onto NHS staff.
Just because Boris Johnson is the Prime Minister does not mean that the same forces cannot be at work here, and indeed, this is the most plausible explanation for the ‘Party Scandal’.
The Dr. Steve James/Sajid Javid Story
But what about more substantive issues relating to the Official Covid Narrative? In particular, the forced jabs for NHS staff?
The government passed legislation in December 2021, and published it this month, stating that ‘frontline’ NHS staff (frontline being defined extremely broadly) have to have 2 Covid-19 jabs by April. There has been a campaign opposing this legislation from NHS100K, the Together Campaign and the Workers of England Union.
However, recently a video was released of a doctor, Steve James, directly challenging Sajid Javid on the jab mandate. The doctor himself is unvaccinated and has natural immunity against Sars-Cov-2 according to his own account:
Furthermore, he has been invited on to other news channels to discuss the reasons why he won’t be vaccinated in more depth:
I do find this story quite interesting, I must say. The initial video was released by Sky News, i.e. the mainstream media. Not some random undercover phone video. If the mainstream media released this video, rather than pretending none of the doctors challenged Javid, there must be some sort of function within the mainstream narrative for that to happen. (We could further ask why Javid was even in the earshot of an unvaccinated doctor as HR, etc. in the NHS know who is vaccinated).
So why has this video been released to the public?
I don’t have all the answers on this question. The most favourable interpretation for the anti-lockdown/vaxpass/mandate people is that the government knows that they cannot get away with the NHS mandate. On this interpretation, this is a soft walk back in the narrative, priming the public for when the mandate is dropped.
Personally I think they are more likely to try and go through with the mandate although I don’t think them dropping it is impossible if a large number of NHS staff remain uninjected (more likely some sort of fudge option will be taken rather than outright dropping it).
If they are not going to drop the mandate there are other possible reasons that could be considered for the release of this clip to the public. For example, the creation of a hate figure, represented by James himself as the ‘selfish unjabbed doctor’. The aim in this scenario (regardless of whether this strategy is effective) is to target the public’s ire at James to distract from the likely devastation to NHS services that will be inflicted by the mandate.
The Daily Mail, which is highly schizophrenic when it comes to the Covid Narrative, has published an article attacking Dr. Steve James. After having a dig at James’s religious beliefs, the article spouts claims about how he is ‘enabling anti-vaxxers’ (none of the media ever define the term ‘anti-vaxxer’). The article then goes on to attack him for mentioning NHS100K, with the usual assertions that James is citing a ‘conspiracy theorist’ organisation. This is achieved through the notion that both right wingers and NHS100K use Telegram.
They also state that the mandate is popular, without providing any evidence of that claim (not even a manipulated YouGov poll!) There is a bunch of other nonsense in the article that to address it all would get off topic.
I am very sceptical of such a narrative for a number of reasons. The government now have the infrastructure for such a scheme in place. Even if it is scrapped due to the unpopularity of the passport, it can be brought back in at any time with the reactivation of the NHS Covid pass. Any event – such as a ‘spike in cases’ caused by false positives – can be used to either not scrap the legislation or bring it back in at any time.
We must also bear in mind that there have been multiple other times where the narrative has been temporarily weakened in order to drive it forward, such as the ‘scrapping’ of vaccine passports in September only to bring them back via ‘Plan B’.
Conclusion
Narrative weaknesses in the official Covid-19 account are becoming more obvious to the British public. Because of this, the government and media have been soft pedalling the narrative, but these are not unequivocal signs of victory. The Covid Narrative is far from defeated – and we must not forget that Covid itself is just the means to the end of digital identity and transhumanism.
I had some problems getting to this event. I had aimed for 12 o clock arrival but did not get there until 10 to 1 due to a Birmingham train delay and then Underground chaos due to a strike action. Most of the underground lines were off or severely delayed.
I have no idea how many people were at this event. Parliament Square was very full in contrast to the previous week where it was mostly empty.
I watched as the crowd went past at Parliament Square and tagged on near the back. It took about 20 minutes for the crowd to go past me and more people seemed to keep appearing from nowhere. Anyway it was a large number of people.
My London geography is not very good but having attended several protests there I have an idea of some places. The route was Parliament Square > Hyde Park > Marble Arch > Oxford Circus > Piccadilly Circus > Trafalgar Square > Downing Street (although I stopped at Piccadilly).
I will post some footage below from the event:
Quick clip below from early on (not sure where this is):
After about an hour (you can hear the cars beeping at the protesters in this one):
Here is Hyde Park, I tried to show some of the scale of the march in this video:
Here is Oxford Street:
Here’s Piccadilly Circus. Note I had cut through to Regent Street so I was nearer the front but I still don’t know where the front was. Note although it looks like it may have finished at the end of this clip, more people appeared after I stopped the video.
Here’s more people going past Piccadilly Circus, from a different spot:
A few weeks ago the government announced that they would not be going ahead with a plan for vaccine passports over the winter period. As vaccine passports are the most important aspect of this whole Covid agenda (in the short term at least) this was a setback for the government. However, they are now planning another way to get ‘COVID Certification’ through the door – the idea of the ‘winter emergency’.
[V]accine passports will be back, perhaps in October or November when the flu season hits. When the issue of antibody dependent enhancement – vaccination worsening clinical disease due to non neutralising antibodies – hits the vaccinated (or simply (un)known side effects from MRNA jabs), this will be the next opportunity for another vaccine passport push. Lockdowns will inevitably be introduced to combat the ‘new variant’ of vaccine induced disease, with Johnson stating that the only way out is vaccine passports.
Lo and behold, the government has announced a new consultation called “Proposal for mandatory COVID certification in a Plan B scenario: call for evidence”. This outlines an alleged ’emergency’ scenario implemented if ‘the NHS is likely to come under unsustainable pressure’. Of course, being as the NHS comes under significant pressure every flu season, combined with the massive backlog of medical issues the NHS refused to treat because they aren’t Covid, the NHS will be under ‘unsustainable pressure’ by definition. As previously mentioned, antibody dependent enhancement and vaccine side effects will come into play as well, meaning a much worse flu season than normal.
This will give them their excuse to ‘reluctantly’ introduce ‘temporary’ ‘Covid Certification’ to ‘protect the NHS’ from patients.
mandatory vaccine-only certification could be introduced for all visitors aged 18 or over
members of the workforce aged 18 or over in these settings could then be required to test regularly, if they are not fully vaccinated
This document specifies what precisely the government plan is. In this document, the government is trying to sell the vaccine passport via blackmail, essentially telling buisness owners that their choices are to accept vaccine passports or be plunged back into lockdown.
These are the venues that the government wishes to force the vaccine passport upon:
all nightclubs and other venues open after 1am with alcohol, music and dancing
indoor events with 500 or more attendees where those attendees are likely to stand and mix to a significant degree, or move around during the event, such as music venues or large receptions
outdoor, crowded settings with 4,000 or more attendees where those attendees are likely to stand, or move around during the event, such as outdoor festivals
any settings with 10,000 or more attendees, such as large sports and music stadia
In other words, this is essentially the same plan that Sajid Javid said was not going to be introduced over the winter, repackaged as a new ’emergency’ plan. Of course the government then adds that it may be expanded beyond these settings.
They also add this further comment which is worthy of note:
At present, the NHS COVID Pass displays an individual’s COVID status on the basis of vaccine, test or natural immunity status. If mandatory certification were introduced, the NHS COVID Pass would switch so that it certified individuals based on vaccine status only.
In other words, natural immunity is irrelevant according to this government. This scientifically illiterate argument is basically stating that Sars-Cov-2 is a unique virus where natural immunity does not apply – obviously demonstrating that this plan is not about ‘the science’ but about ‘the politics’.
Filling out the Consultation
If you want to fill out the consultation, you only have until the 11th October to do so.
The consultation asks for information about you and who you are including age, ‘gender’ (in a biology denial sense) etc.
It then asks if you think the list of settings is too broad or too narrow. If you click ‘too broad’ it then asks you which settings should be excluded (150 words). Obviously just say all of them and bring up the usual arguments against vaccine passports:
Authoritarian
Abrogate informed consent by applying coercion
create a two tier society
are scientifically illiterate as ‘the vaccinated’ can still spread Covid
Then it asks you if you would prefer if people going to events are vaccinated or not, similar to the question on the forced jabs for NHS staff consultation.
The questions then ask whether you think people (first visitors and then staff) should be forced to take an injection. Obviously you can tick strongly disagree to both. However the next two questions assume that you already support the policy in their framing, and are ridiculously biased. The first asks whether ‘unvaccinated’ staff members should be supervised while taking Covid tests, and the second asks whether only customer facing roles should be forced to jab/test or all roles. There’s no option for ‘no-one should be forced to jab/test’. The last bit on the page then asks for your further comments.
Staff would be pressured by bosses to get the jabs to avoid testing and having to self-isolate/not being able to work at these events. This means they would not be taking a vaccine under free and informed consent should they get vaccinated to stop the pressure
Side effects of the jab & liability for these side effects
Increased chance of workplace harassment due to jabbed staff having to deal with unjabbed staff not being able to work due to false positives.
Jab status would have to be disclosed to the employer
Do not work as you can get Covid off a fully vaccinated person
Ignore natural immunity
It then asks you if you think more groups should be exempt. According to their list children and people with a relevant medical conditions are exempt. I mean technically, yes, as I think everyone should be exempt. I stated as such and also that the policy breaches the Equality Act 2010 by ignoring religion, belief, and pregnancy protected classes.
The consultation then asks if any protected classes will benefit and if any will be disadvantaged.
No-one will benefit from an authoritarian ‘papers please’ dystopia.
You can still get Sars-Cov-2 from the ‘fully vaccinated’ so claiming that this policy benefits elderly or disabled people by decreasing their risk is wrong.
It will disadvantage disabled people due to forcing them to prove a medical exemption that may not be granted due to the climate of ‘vaccine good no matter what’.
It will disadvantage pregnant women who may not want the vaccine due to effect on the child.
It will disadvantage those with a religion/belief exemption.
All these groups will be treated as second class employees/citizens.
It then asks for any final thoughts on the consultation, and following this, how you felt about the consultation process and how they could improve, so I told them to ditch the loaded questions.
Conclusion
As predicted, the government is not scrapping the idea of vaccine passports, but merely attempting to bring them in via the inevitable ‘NHS winter emergency’ and they have already created the basis for this with a new consultation on the policy.
The UK Government announced on the 12 September that vaccine passports will not currently be going ahead, contradicting previous statements that they would be introduced for nightclubs and big events this month. Instead, on the 9th September, a consultation was launched regarding forcing frontline NHS staff to have the Covid injection. This article will discuss both aspects, and possible linkages between the two.
The Vaccine Passport
Let’s begin with the vaccine passport. I have put a lot of emphasis on the vaccine passport in previous articles, arguing that the vaccine passport is the key short term aim of the entire Covid Narrative. On the surface, the decision to scrap vaccine passports disproves my arguments. In reality, however, it does not contradict my argument for a couple of reasons.
The first reason is that the government has been forced to backtrack. Vaccine passports are extremely unpopular with the British public. While polling organisations such as Yougov claim that a large percentage of the public support vaccine passports, these polls are more about manufacturing consent for the policy than recording facts. All indications, both in my personal life and on social media, as well as among many affected business owners, indicate vaccine passports are unpopular. The issue of vaccine passports has also angered many people who supported or were neutral towards lockdowns, and/or have had the jabs.
There have also been large demonstrations against vaccine passports. The monthly events in London – although focusing on all aspects of the Covid Narrative – have recently been advertised primarily as anti vaccine passport. There have also been massive demonstrations in countries that have already introduced the vaccine passport, such as France. Australia – one of the most draconian countries when it comes to restrictions allegedly to ‘control the pandemic’ – is also starting to kick off.
All of this makes it much harder for the British government to introduce the passport.
The second point demonstrating that passports are still essential to the government’s thinking is that the policy is not being abandoned. They have been forced into retreat by resistance to the policy but have explicitly said that it is not being ruled out. Sajid Javid stated that:
We’ve looked at it properly and, whilst we should keep it in reserve as a potential option, I’m pleased to say that we will not be going ahead with plans for vaccine passports.
To translate from government speak, this means that vaccine passports will be back, perhaps in October or November when the flu season hits. When the issue of antibody dependent enhancement – vaccination worsening clinical disease due to non neutralising antibodies – hits the vaccinated (or simply (un)known side effects from MRNA jabs), this will be the next opportunity for another vaccine passport push. Lockdowns will inevitably be introduced to combat the ‘new variant’ of vaccine induced disease, with Johnson stating that the only way out is vaccine passports.
Forcing NHS Staff to Get ‘Vaccinated’: The Next Step
A few months ago, the government announced that people working in care homes have to be ‘fully vaccinated’ (both shots of the AstraZeneca or Pfizer vaccine) or face being sacked. Staff have to have had their first vaccine by September 16. The next step for the government is to try and force NHS staff to have the jab, but this will be a harder nut to crack than care home staff, which explians why care home staff were forced first.
According to the Skills for Care website, care home staff were paid an average of £8.50 an hour during 2019/20 and 73% were paid below the Living Wage. The gross income of this wage (assuming a 37.5 hour work week) is £16,575. However, even the lowest ranked NHS staff (a Band 2 member of staff who has worked in the NHS for less than 2 years) recieved a gross income of £17,652 in 2019/20 for the 37.5 hours a week. When you start to get into the higher pay bands you start seeing people who have significant economic resources to oppose forced vaccines. Again using the 2019/20 data for comparison, experienced Band 7 staff take home £43,772, whereas Band 8 staff take home between £44,606 and £86,687 depending on whether they are in subgroup a, b, c or d and their level of experience.
According to the DHSC, around 92% of NHS trust staff have received one dose of a Covid-19 vaccine, with 88% of staff having received both doses.
However, the DHSC says new data shows uptake rates between NHS trusts can vary from around 78% to 94% for both doses.
Gievn how many people the NHS employs this is a lot of people and statistically some of them are likely to have economic resources. NHS staff can also serve as a test case for future vaccine mandates for this reason.
There is currently a degree of ambiguity about the government’s plan, as to whether it will be just for frontline staff, or for all NHS staff including clerical and management. The consultation on forced jabs seems to imply the plan is only for clinical staff (if this is the case, I believe that the plan will be for two stages, perhaps to avoid taking on too many staff at once) but the media seem to imply that the jabs will be forced on all staff.
Forced jabs will help the government achieve its vaccine passport goals. While some people who are injected oppose vaccine passports, every person who gets jabbed makes it easier for the government to introduce the policy. ‘The unvaccinated’ have no choice but to resist a vaccine passport policy through boycotting and subversion, but ‘the vaccinated’ can choose to comply. Many people – even if formally opposed to vaccine passports – may buckle if they are actually introduced.
Conclusion
The government cannot tolerate more than a very small number opting out of the vaccine passport digital control matrix. Some people will buckle and get the injection if they are threatened with not being able to feed their family. This increases the percentage of the population who are injected. Some people will hold the line and lose their jobs, becoming the excluded in the new medical apartheid.
Appendix: Filling out the Consultation
If you want to fill out the government consultation it can be found here. It closes on the 22nd of October 2021. As you cannot see the questions in advance as it is a click through consultation rather than one where all the questions are up front. I will outline the questions that are asked and the parameters of the responses.
The consultation asks if you would prefer if a doctor or nurse treating you has the Covid 19 and flu vaccines. Then it asks if you think healthcare staff should be forced to have the vaccines for Covid and flu and to justify your answers. You are limited to 500 words for the justification which makes it a bit difficult as there isn’t enough words to quote from scientific studies on the dangers of the jabs. The same question is then asked for those under 18 in the sector. The study asks about possible negative effects on protected classes and then how the government can encourage uptake in non regulated roles.
Here are some key points you could raise if you decide to fill in the consultation:
In terms of staff being forced:
The jabs don’t stop people catching or spreading Sars-Cov-2 (according to the manufacturers themselves), so staff having the jab cannot protect patients. Patients can still catch the virus from a ‘fully vaccinated’ member of staff.
Sacking NHS staff for not taking the jab will put patients more at risk through causing/increasing understaffing, meaning overworked doctors and nurses making preventable errors and patients not being seen.
Forced jabs ignore the issue of natural immunity. Many NHS staff will have had the virus and recovered giving them extremely potent antibodies against Sars-Cov-2 and these antibodies protect against ‘variants’ according to the scientific evidence. Making them have a vaccine is medically irrational.
The horrific side effects of the jab. I personally cited the titles of two articles on myocarditis due to space limitations, as well as the massive amount of reports to Yellow Card and VAERS.
It’s still in clinical trials.
It violates already existing NHS contracts.
In terms of protected classes:
This refers to the Equality Act 2010. There are three protected classes negatively affected.
Disability: although the consultation allows medical exemptions, forced jabs will cause unnecessary stress for disabled staff. Due to the obsession with jabbing the entire population and GPs being entirely focused on Covid, it will likely be extremely difficult for those with even a legitimate reason for exemption (such as someone with a history of blood clots when they admit the jabs can cause blood clots) to obtain an exemption in practise.
Pregnancy and Maternity: Women will be concerned about the lack of studies on pregnancy and the jab, especially given that the Yellow Card system and VAERS have multiple miscarriages reported after the injections.
Religion and Belief: There is no provision made in the proposals for religious exemptions. This is discrimination based on religion if someone declined the vaccine due to religious beliefs, for example a belief that genetic engineering is morally wrong due to ‘playing God’. THere may be other beliefs that could be protected, for example, some have argued that ethical vegans would have to be classed as exempt due to the fact that the vaccine has had some animal trials.
We are asking for responses by 11 October, although we encourage stakeholders to submit views as quickly as possible in case there is need to introduce certification, as part of Plan B, at short notice.
The COVID-19 Response: Autumn and Winter Plan 2021, published on 14 September, sets out the government’s aims to sustain the progress made and prepare the country for future challenges, while ensuring the National Health Service (NHS) does not come under unsustainable pressure during this period. If the data suggests the NHS is likely to come under unsustainable pressure, the government has prepared a Plan B for England.
So, in other words, they will cook up some nonsense Neil Ferguson model as an excuse to bring this in.
Cassandra's Box 