Birmingham Anti Covid Measures Protest 19th November 2022

This was a walk round the city centre with some protest signs and flags. There were no speeches to record today.

The route of the march started outside the Art museum, went through the German Market and round to Pigeon Park and from there back down towards the Bull Ring. The group stopped in several places so this very short distance walk took maybe 45 minutes.

Pro Cash Messages

Now that the Covid insanity has receded somewhat (though not entirely) there is a large amount of messaging on the importance of cash – which is extremely important to combat the digital identity/social credit score matrix the elite want to build. We mustn’t forget that Covid per se is not the point, the point is to build this control matrix and Covid is merely the means.

Perhaps ‘the left’ could’ve considered the above.

The nature of the toxic covid injections was also a theme as well as the large amount of people who have ‘died suddenly’.

And also the theme of Matt Hancock, now he is an ‘I’m a Celebrity’ contestant, and his purchases of large amounts of Midazolam.

There is video footage on my Odysee account. This is the video where someone starts playing Uprising by Muse on the speakers.

114 Medical Professionals in Russia Who Died Suddenly: An English Translation (Part 2)

Introduction

Russia has pursued similar coronavirus policies to the West, including lockdowns and mass ‘vaccination’. Russia developed its own jab, Sputnik V, which is similar to the AstraZeneca ‘vaccine’. Russians, however, proved more reluctant to get jabbed than their Western counterparts. Russian vaccination rates have not gone above 60%, and even achieving this level of coverage required coercive measures. Russian regions imposed vaccine passports and no-jab-no-job policies.

When these toxic jabs are given out, ‘died suddenly’ cases inevitably follow. ‘Died Suddenly’ has become a very common phrase in articles covering deaths and obituaries. Compilers such as Mark Crispin Miller have been documenting these cases as a means to expose the jabs and document the crime-in-progress of giving these experimental injections. As Russia has no equivalent of VAERS or Yellow Card for reporting of jab injuries, good information on this is even harder to get than in the West. Cases of Russian ‘vaccine’-injury are also mostly behind a language barrier for Western audiences. Hence there has been very little coverage of the problems of Sputnik in the West, outside of Riley Waggaman and Miller’s weekly compilations.

Russian compilers have been working to expose possible/probable jab deaths, one example is this document ‘114 Doctors’ about sudden death among medical professionals. It looks as if it was compiled by the website Stop Vaczism, which was shut down at its original web address (which means all the links in the 114 doctors document to this website are unfortunately broken). This document offers a translation of the Russian text, which will be split into 2 parts. The purpose of this translation will be a) to provide more information on sudden death cases in Russia to an English-speaking audience and b) to combat the narrative put out by some individuals in the independent media – mostly those more sympathetic to some of Russia’s foreign policy positions – that Sputnik V is safe.

A note on the data: cases are in age order, starting from the youngest, and some have more data listed than others. Many of these are listed as sudden Covid-19 deaths by the authorities, others are deaths from known jab side effects (such as blood clots). Some are the ‘unknown cause of death’ we have got used to seeing over the past 18 months.

Acronyms, mostly used in the profession category:

  • GBUZ: State Budgetary Healthcare Institution.
  • MBUZ: Municipal Budgetary Healthcare Institution
  • CO, VO etc: First letter stands for the name of the region, second letter for the word ‘region’.
  • GMU: State Medical University
  • FGBOU: Federal State-Funded Educational Institution of Higher Education.

Any errors in translation are my own.

Anyone is free to republish this translation with a link back to this page.

Cases 58-114:

Case 58

  • Name: Alexander Vasilevich Paramonov
  • Age: 63
  • Region: Samarskaya
  • City: Syzran’
  • Condition: Dead
  • Date of Death: 28/09/2021
  • Profession: Doctor – obstetrics and gynecology of women’s consultation at GBUZ CO Syzran’ TsGB.
  • Cause of Death: Official cause of death is due to a breakaway blood clot.
  • Further Information: On the 28th September 2021 in the city of Syzran’ in Samarskaya region, 63-year-old Alexander Vasilevich Paramonov, a doctor of obstetrics and gynecology of women’s consultation at GBUZ CO Syzran’ TsGB, died suddenly. He died in the covid hospital, where he was hospitalised for novel coronavirus infection (Covid-19).

Case 59

  • Name: Tatiana Nikolaevna Giniaytova
  • Age: 63
  • Date of Birth: 19/04/1968
  • Region: Sverdlovskaya
  • City: Nizhnii Tagil
  • Condition: Dead
  • Date of Death: 26/11/2021
  • Profession: Midwife, stand in for obstetrician-gynecologist of the highest category, obstetrician-gynecologist at women’s service GAUZ SO ‘GB no 1 in the city of Nizhnii Tagil.’
  • Cause of Death: Official cause of death is coronavirus infection
  • Further Information: On the 26th November in the city of Nizhnii Tagil in Sverdlovskaya region, 63-year-old Tatiana Nikolaevna Giniaytova, midwife, stand in for obstetrician-gynecologist of the highest category, obstetrician-gynecologist at women’s service GAUZ SO ‘GB no 1 in the city of Nizhnii Tagil’, died suddenly.

Case 60

  • Name: Marina Borisovna Slutskaya
  • Age: 64
  • Date of Birth: 02/09/1956
  • Region: Moscow
  • City: Moscow
  • ‘Vaccine’: EpiVacKorona
  • Condition: Dead
  • Date of Most Recent ‘Vaccination’: 08/07/2021
  • Date of Death: 08/08/2021
  • Time After ‘Vaccination’: 30 days
  • Profession: Doctor
  • Further Information: On the 8th August 2021, vaccinated 64-year-old Marina Borisovna Slutskaya died. On the 08/07/2021 she received her second ‘vaccine’ against coronavirus, and began to feel worse after 4 days. As written on social media by Dmitrii Drobyshevsky, “Today Mura is gone, a good person from our group.”

Case 61

  • Name: Pavel Lvovich Polyeshaev
  • Age: 64
  • Region: Khabarovskii
  • City: Komsomolsk in Amur
  • Condition: Dead
  • Date of Most Recent ‘Vaccination’: 07/07/2021
  • Date of Death: 09/07/2021
  • Time After ‘Vaccination’: 2 days
  • Profession: Ambulance doctor
  • Cause of Death: Official cause of death is kidney failure.
  • Further Information: In Komsomolsk in Amur an emergency doctor, Pavel Lvovich Polyeshaev, was vaccinated on the 7th July, and on the 9th July he died. This summer was his last. Pavel was 64 years old. Medics came straight to him in an ambulance. This was on 7 July, and his temperature had risen to 40 degrees, and his kidneys failed. And the person died, the doctor died.

Case 62

  • Name: Igor Vasilevich Ushakov
  • Age: 64
  • Date of Birth: 25/09/1957
  • Region: Irkutskaya
  • City: Irkutsk
  • Condition: Dead
  • Date of Death: 22/11/2021
  • Profession: Lead doctor at OGAUZ Irkutsk Regional Clinical Consultative-Diagnostic Centre, degree in medical science, President NO ‘Diagnostic Medical Association’.
  • Cause of Death: Official cause of death is coronavirus infection
  • Further Information: On the 22nd November in Irkutsk 64 year old Igor Vasilevich Ushakov, lead doctor at OGAUZ Irkutsk Regional Clinical Consultative-Diagnostic Centre, degree in medical science, President NO ‘Diagnostic Medical Association’, died suddenly from coronavirus.

Case 63

  • Name: Irina Borisovna Gorokhova
  • Age: 65
  • Date of Birth: 06/03/1956
  • Region: Yaroslavskaya
  • City: Rybinsk
  • Condition: Dead
  • Date of Death: 02/07/2021
  • Profession: Paediatric lead at Rybinsk wing of the Yaroslav medical college
  • Further Information: On the 2nd July 2021, in Rybinsk in Yaroslav region 65-year-old Irina Borisovna Gorokhova, paediatric lead at Rybinsk wing of the Yaroslav medical college, died suddenly. The website of the Yaroslav Medical College did not even post an obituary. According to local residents she died after ‘vaccination’.

Case 64

  • Name: Ludmila Ivanovna Bezcmertnikh
  • Age: 65
  • Date of Birth: 05/02/1956
  • Region: Moskovskaya
  • City: Lotoshina
  • ‘Vaccine’: Sputnik V
  • Condition: Dead
  • Date of Death: 25/08/2021
  • Profession: Deputy to the lead doctor with expertise on temporal disability GBUZ MO Lotoshina TsRB
  • Further Information: On the 25th August in Lotoshino in Moskovskaya region, 65-year-old Ludmila Ivanovna Bezcmertnikh, deputy to the lead doctor with expertise on temporal disability GBUZ MO Lotoshina TsRB, suddenly died. No cause of death was reported.

Case 65

  • Name: Vladimir Grigorevich Pravdin
  • Age: 65
  • Date of Birth: 25/06/1956
  • Region: Vologodskaya
  • City: Cherepovets
  • Condition: Dead
  • Date of Death: 03/11/21
  • Profession: Highly-qualified rheumatologist, Doctor of functional diagnostics BUZ VO Cherepovets City Polyclinic No.2.
  • Cause of Death: Official cause of death is coronavirus infection.
  • Further Information: On the 3rd November at the mono-hospital in Cherepovets in Vologodskaya region, the 65-year-old highly-qualified rheumatologist, doctor of functional diagnostics at BUZ VO Cherepovets City Polyclinic No.2 Vladimir Grigorevich Pravdin, died suddenly from novel coronavirus infection.

Case 66

  • Name: Pyotr Ivanovich Romanyuk
  • Age: 66
  • Date of Birth: 18/06/1955
  • Region: Moskovskaya
  • City: Mikulino
  • Condition: Dead
  • Date of Death: 14/10/21
  • Profession: Merited doctor of the Russian Federation, lead doctor at GBUZ MO ‘MOPB-12’, chairman of the Council of Deputies, honourable resident of the city region of Lotoshino. 19th March 2021 he was elected to the regional secretary of United Russia party.
  • Further Information: On the 14th October in Mikulino in Lotoshinsky of Moscow region, merited doctor of the Russian Federation, lead doctor at GBUZ MO ‘MOPB-12’, chairman of the Council of Deputies, honourable resident of the city region of Lotoshino, 66-year-old Pyotr Ivanovich Romanyuk died suddenly.

Case 67

  • Name: Iraida Albertovna Ryazanova
  • Age: 66
  • Date of Birth: 29/09/1954
  • Region: Chelyabinskaya
  • City: Kopeisk
  • Condition: Dead
  • Date of Death: 31/08/2021
  • Profession: Paediatrician, nurse at the department at Dundisha GBUZ City Children’s Polyclinic No.1 in the city of Kopeisk.
  • Further Information: On the 31 August in the Covid ward in Kopeisk in Chelyabinskaya, a paediatrician and nurse at the department at Dundisha GBUZ City Children’s Polyclinic No.1 in the city of Kopeisk, 66-year-old Iraida Albertovna Ryazanova died suddenly of novel coronavirus infection.

Case 68

  • Name: Mikhail Mikhailovich Levsha
  • Age: 66
  • Region: Primorskii
  • City: Nakhodka
  • Condition: Dead
  • Date of Death: 03/11/2021
  • Profession: Anesthetist in the highest category SP at Children’s Hospital No. 2 KGBUZ Nakhodka City Hospital
  • Further Information: On the 3rd November 2021 in the city of Nakhodka, an anesthetist in the highest category SP at Children’s Hospital No. 2 KGBUZ Nakhodka City Hospital, 66-year-old Mikhail Mikhailovich Levsha, died suddenly.

Case 69

  • Name: Valerii Arkadevich Ogorodov
  • Age: 66
  • Date of Birth: 06/08/1955
  • Region: Permskii
  • City: Aleksandrovsk
  • Condition: Dead
  • Date of Death: 17/10/2021
  • Profession: Divisional doctor at the outpatient clinic at region of Karyer Isvestyak GBUZ PK Alexandrovsk TsGB
  • Further Information: On the 17th October in Aleksandrovsk in Perm region 66-year-old Valerii Arkadevich Ogorodov, a divisional doctor at the outpatient clinic at region of Karyer Isvestyak GBUZ PK Alexandrovsk TsGB, died suddenly.

Case 70

  • Name: Valerii Ivanovich Sovalkin
  • Age: 66
  • Date of Birth: 07/11/1955
  • Region: Omskaya
  • City: Omsk
  • Condition: Dead
  • Date of Death: 05/12/2021
  • Profession: Prorector of Postgraduate Education, lead chair of hospital medicine and endocrinology, doctor of medical science, professor FGBOU VO ‘OmGMU Ministry of Health of Russia’
  • Further Information: On the 5th December 2021 in Omsk, 66-year-old Valerii Ivanovich Sovalkin, Prorector of Postgraduate Education, lead chair of hospital medicine and endocrinology, doctor of medical science, professor FGBOU VO ‘OmGMU Ministry of Health of Russia’, died suddenly.

Case 71

  • Name: Olga Petrovna Barkovskaya
  • Age: 66
  • Region: Chelyabinskaya
  • City: Chelyabinsk
  • Condition: Dead
  • Date of Death: 12/10/2021
  • Profession: Psychiatrist, deputy lead doctor at the medical part of GBUZ ‘regional clinical specialist psychiatric hospital no. 1’
  • Further Information: On the 12th October 2021 in Chelyabinsk 66-year-old Olga Petrovna Barkovskaya, psychiatrist and deputy lead doctor at the medical part of GBUZ ‘regional clinical specialist psychiatric hospital no. 1’ died suddenly.

Case 72

  • Name: Valentina Vasilevna Krylova
  • Age: 67
  • Date of Birth: 11/04/1954
  • Region: Irkutskaya
  • City: Taishet
  • Condition: Dead
  • Profession: Major of internal service, boss of the infirmary Taishet SIZO No. 3.
  • Further Information: On the 2nd August 2021 in the hospital at the city of Angarsk in Irkutskaya, 67-year-old resident of Taishet Valentina Vasilevna Krylova, a doctor, major of internal service and boss of the infirmary FKU ‘SIZO-3 GUFSIN Russia in Irkutsk region’, died suddenly from covid.

Case 73

  • Name: Viktor Petrovich Tsimbayuk
  • Age: 67
  • Date of Birth: 24/02/1954
  • Region: Ulyanovskaya
  • City: Dimitrovgrad
  • Condition: Dead
  • Date of Death: 10/11/2021
  • Profession: Surgeon at KB No.172 department FGBU ‘FNKTsRiO’ FMBA of Russia
  • Further Information: In Dimitrovgrad in Ulyanovsk 67-year-old Viktor Petrovich Tsimbayuk, surgeon at KB No.172 department FGBU ‘FNKTsRiO’ FMBA of Russia, suddenly died of novel coronavirus infection.

Case 74

  • Name: Alexander Minevsky
  • Age: 67
  • Region: Rostovskaya
  • City: Taganrog
  • Condition: Dead
  • Date of Death: 19/03/2021
  • Profession: Lead doctor at the Centre for Medical Rehabilitation no. 1
  • Further Information: On the night of 19th March 2021 in Taganrog of Rostov region, 67-year-old Alexander Minevsky, lead doctor at the Centre for Medical Rehabilitation no. 1, suddenly died. It was written in commentaries that he died of a heart attack after his second dose of the ‘vaccination’. It is known that the medic had recently had a coronavirus infection.

Case 75

  • Name: Valerii Vasilevich Tailashev
  • Age: 67
  • Date of Birth: 20/09/1954
  • Region: Perm
  • City: Solikamsk
  • Condition: Dead
  • Date of Death: 13/10/2021
  • Profession: Trauma Orthopaedist, surgeon at inpatient facility GBUZ PK Solikamsk TsPB
  • Cause of Death: Official cause of death is coronavirus infection.
  • Further Information: On the 13th October 2021 in the city of Solikamsk in Perm region, 67 year old Valerii Vasilevich Tailashev, a trauma orthopaedist and surgeon at the inpatient facility GBUZ PK Solikamsk TsPB, died suddenly. The reason for his death is not named, but according to comments he died from novel coronavirus infection.

Case 76

  • Name: Vladislav Viktorovich Lonsky
  • Age: 67
  • Date of Birth: 05/01/1954
  • Region: Orenburgskaya
  • City: Orenburg
  • Condition: Dead
  • Date of Death: 05/08/2021
  • Profession: Otolaryngologist, doctor of the highest category, degree in medical science, merited doctor of the Russian Federation, GAUZ Orenburg Regional Clinical Hospital
  • Cause of Death: He fell ill a week after taking the first dose of the ‘vaccine’.
  • Further Information: On the 5th August 2021 in Orenburg, Vladislav Viktorovich Lonsky, 67, an otolaryngologist, doctor of the highest category, degree in medical science, merited doctor of the Russian Federation, GAUZ Orenburg Regional Clinical Hospital died of coronavirus.

Case 77

  • Name: Antonina Ivanovna Grekova
  • Age: 67
  • Date of Birth: 14/02/1953
  • Region: Smolenskaya
  • City: Smolensk
  • Condition: Dead
  • Date of Death: 07/10/2021
  • Profession: Degree in medical science, merited doctor of the Russian Federation, reader, Infection specialist OGBUZ ‘KB no. 1’, lead at the department of infectious diseases in children FGBOU VO SGMU MZ of Russia.
  • Cause of Death: Official cause of death is coronavirus infection
  • Further Information: On the 7th October in the infection department of the clinical hospital of Smolensk, 67-year-old Antonina Ivanovna Grekova, degree in medical science, merited doctor of the Russian Federation, reader, Infection specialist OGBUZ ‘KB no. 1’, lead at the department of infectious diseases in children, died suddenly from coronavirus.

Case 78

  • Name: Fyodor Fadeyevich Filippov
  • Age: 68
  • Date of Birth: 02/02/1953
  • Region: Sevastopol
  • City: Sevastopol
  • Condition: Dead
  • Date of Death: 04/08/2021
  • Time after ‘Vaccination’: 0 days
  • Profession: Urologist at OOO ‘Medical-Sevastopol’
  • Further Information: In Sevastopol 68-year-old Fyodor Fadeyevich Filippov, a urologist at OOO ‘Medical-Sevastopol’, suddenly died. According to residents, he died several hours after ‘vaccination’. On the website of OOO ‘Medical-Sevastopol’ there isn’t even an obituary for this famous Sevastopol doctor who served 44 years in medicine.

Case 79

  • Name: Vasilii Alexandrovich Laktanov
  • Age: 68
  • Region: Moskovskaya
  • City: Orekhovo-Zuevo
  • Condition: Dead
  • Date of Death: 29/11/2021
  • Profession: Trauma Orthopaedist at GBUZ MO ‘Orekhovo-Zuevo TsGB’, OOO Clinic of New Medicine
  • Further Information: On the 29th November 2021 in city of Orekhovo-Zuevo in Moskovskaya region, 68-year-old Vasilii Alexandrovich Laktanov, a trauma orthopaedist at GBUZ MO ‘Orekhovo-Zuevo TsGB’, OOO Clinic of New Medicine, suddenly died. In commentaries it was written that his cause of death was cancer.

Case 80

  • Name: Tatiana Vasilevna Zhdannikova
  • Age: 68
  • Region: Khabarovskii
  • City: Mariinsckii Reid
  • Condition: Dead
  • Date of Death: 04/12/2021
  • Profession: Nurse at the Reid department of KGBUZ ‘Ulchckaya regional hospital’, veteran of labour
  • Cause of Death: Official cause of death is coronavirus infection
  • Further Information: On the 4th October in Mariinskii Reid in the Ulchskaya region of Kharabovskii, 68-year-old Tatiana Vasilevna Zhdannikova, a nurse at the Reid department of KGBUZ ‘Ulchckaya regional hospital’ and veteran of labour, died suddenly from novel coronavirus infection.

Case 81

  • Name: Viktor Konstantinovich Alesenko
  • Age: 69
  • Region: Primorskii
  • City: Nakhodka
  • Condition: Dead
  • Date of Death: 14/09/2021
  • Profession: Honoured health defender of the Russian Federation, Obstetrician and Gynecologist in the highest category SP ‘City Hospital No. 1’ KGBUZ Nakhodka City Hospital. Viktor Alesenko headed the gynecological department for 11 years.
  • Further Information: On the 14th September 2021 in the city of Nakhodka in Primorskii region 69-year-old honoured health defender of the Russian Federation, Obstetrician and Gynecologist in the highest category SP ‘City Hospital No. 1’ KGBUZ Nakhodka City Hospital, Viktor Konstantinovich Alesenko, died suddenly.

Case 82

  • Name: Tatiana Alexandrovna Solodkova
  • Age: 69
  • Region: Samarskaya
  • City: Syzran’
  • Condition: Dead
  • Date of Death: 24/09/2021
  • Profession: Doctor of the highest category, Obstetrician & Gynecologist, leader of women’s consultations at GBUZ SO Syzran’ City Hospital No.2′ After several days of Covid-19 her spouse died.
  • Cause of Death: Official cause of death is coronavirus infection.
  • Further Information: On the 24th September 2021 in the Covid hospital in Syzran’ in Samarskaya region, 69-year-old Tatiana Alexandrovna Solodkova, a doctor of the highest category, obstetrician & gynecologist, leader of women’s consultations at GBUZ SO Syzran’ City Hospital No.2′, died suddenly from Covid-19.

Case 83

  • Name: Nikolai Viktorovich Menkov
  • Age: 70
  • Date of Birth: 18/07/1951
  • Region: Nizhegorodskaya
  • City: Nizhnii Novgorod
  • Condition: Dead
  • Date of Death: 24/08/2021
  • Profession: Lead Pulmonary Specialist in Nizhegorodskaya region, pulmonary specialist, degree in medical science, reader at the department of preliminary studies on medical diseases NizhGMA
  • Cause of Death: Official cause of death is coronavirus infection
  • Further Information: On the 24th August in the city of Nizhnii Novgorod, 70-year-old Nikolai Viktorovich Menkov, Lead Pulmonary Specialist in Nizhegorodskaya region, pulmonary specialist, degree in medical science, reader at the department of preliminary studies on medical diseases NizhGMA, died suddenly from coronavirus infection.

Case 84

  • Name: Lyudmila Grigorevna Bondarchuk
  • Age: 70
  • Region: Sverdlovskaya
  • City: Yekaterinburg
  • Condition: Dead
  • Date of Death: 01/11/2021
  • Profession: Doctor of the highest category, cosmetic dermatologist at the polyclinic 3 Shinnom factory GAUZ SO central city hospital no. 20.
  • Cause of Death: official cause of death is coronavirus infection.
  • Further Information: On 1st November 2021 in the city of Yekaterinburg, 70-year-old Lyudmila Grigorevna Bondarchuk, a doctor of the highest category, cosmetic dermatologist at the polyclinic 3 Shinnom factory GAUZ SO central city hospital no. 20, suddenly died from complications of Covid 19.

Case 85

  • Name: Sergei Andreevich Perov
  • Age: 70
  • Region: Perm
  • City: Solikamsk
  • Condition: Dead
  • Date of Death: 23/09/2021
  • Profession: Trauma orthopaedist leader at the trauma point GBUZ PK City hospital in the city of Solikamsk
  • Further Information: On the 23rd of September 2021, in Solikamsk in Perm region, 70-year-old Sergei Andreevich Perov, a trauma orthopaedist and leader at the trauma point at GBUZ PK City hospital in the city of Solikamsk, died suddenly. No cause of death was given.

Case 86

  • Name: Tatiana Alexandrovna Ovsyannikova
  • Age: 71
  • Date of Birth: 12/09/1950
  • Region: Sverdlovskaya
  • City: Nizhnii Tagil
  • Condition: Dead
  • Date of Death: 20/10/2021
  • Profession: Doctor of the highest category, doctor at UZI, Obstetrician & gynecologist at women’s consultation office GAUZ SO ‘GB no.1 in the city of Nizhnii Tagil’
  • Cause of Death: Official cause of death is coronavirus infection.
  • Further Information: On the 20th October 2021, in the city of Nizhnii Tagil in Sverdlovsk region, 71-year-old Tatiana Alexandrovna Ovsyannikova, doctor of the highest category, doctor at UZI, Obstetrician & gynecologist at women’s consultation office GAUZ SO ‘GB no.1 in the city of Nizhnii Tagil’, died suddenly from Covid-19.

Case 87

  • Name: Nikolai Vasilevich Filippov
  • Age: 71
  • Date of Birth: 15/12/1949
  • Region: Volgogradskaya
  • City: Volgograd
  • Condition: Dead
  • Date of Death: 03/11/2021
  • Profession: Famous scientist with a large amount of experience in practical work in a vet’s in Volgogradskaya region, veterinarian, Doctor of Veterinary Science, professor at the department of infectious pathology and forensic veterinary medicine FGOU VPO Vologogradskaya GSKhA.
  • Cause of Death: Official cause of death is coronavirus infection
  • Further Information: On the 3rd November at the Infection hospital at the base of hospital no.4

Case 88

  • Name: Tatiana Petrovna Khodyreva
  • Age: 71
  • Date of Birth: 23/09/1950
  • Region: Perm
  • City: Berezniki
  • ‘Vaccine’: Sputnik V
  • Condition: Dead
  • Date of Death: 25/10/2021
  • Profession: Radiographer at KDO ‘KB named for academic E. A. Vagner.
  • Cause of Death: Official cause of death is coronavirus infection
  • Further Information: on the 25/10/2021 in Berezniki in Perm region the Sputnik-‘vaccinated’ 71-year-old Tatiana Petrovna Khodyreva, a radiographer at KDO ‘KB named for academic E. A. Vagner, died suddenly from Covid-19.

Case 89

  • Name: Mikhail Viktorovich Zhivotovskii
  • Age: 72
  • Region: Nizhegorodskaya
  • City: Nizhnii Novgorod
  • ‘Vaccine’: KoviVac
  • Condition: Dead
  • Date of Death: 21/07/2021
  • Time after ‘Vaccination’: 21 days.
  • Profession: Doctor, paediatric infection specialist, lead at the department GBUZ NO Infection Clinical Hospital No. 23 in the city of Nizhnii Novgorod
  • Cause of Death: Official cause of death is coronavirus infection
  • Further Information: On the 21st July in the city of Nizhnii Novgorod, 72-year-old Mikhail Viktorovich Zhivotovskii, a paediatric infection specialist and lead at the department GBUZ NO Infection Clinical Hospital No. 23 in the city of Nizhnii Novgorod, died suddenly from Covid-19.

Case 90

  • Name: Alexander Pavlovich Medvedev
  • Age: 72
  • Date of Birth: 01/07/1949
  • Region: Nizhegorodskaya
  • City: Nizhnii Novgorod
  • Condition: Dead
  • Date of Death: 23/10/2021
  • Profession: Doctor, original scientist, Doctor of Medical Science, heart surgeon, professor, lead at the department of hospital surgery named for B A Korolyov FGBOU VO PIMU
  • Cause of Death: Official cause of death is coronavirus infection.
  • Further Information: On the 23 October 2021 in the city of Nizhnii Novgorod, 72-year-old Alexander Pavlovich Medvedev, an original scientist, Doctor of Medical Science, heart surgeon, professor and lead at the department of hospital surgery named for B A Korolyov, died suddenly from Covid-19.

Case 91

  • Name: Vera Ivanovna Teryokhina
  • Age: 72
  • Region: Saratovskaya
  • City: Syzran’
  • Condition: Dead
  • Date of Death: 08/11/2021
  • Profession: Paediatrician GBUZ Syzran’ City Polyclinic – Children’s polyclininc no. 1
  • Cause of Death: Official cause of death is coronavirus infection
  • Further Information: On the 8th November 2021 in Syzran’ in Saratov region 72 year old Vera Ivanovna Teryokhina, a paediatrician at GBUZ Syzran’ City Polyclinic – Children’s polyclininc no. 1, died suddely from coronavirus infection.

Case 92

  • Name: Yevgenia Petrovna Kochetova
  • Age: 74
  • Region: Samarskaya
  • City: Novokuibyshevsk
  • Reason for ‘Vaccination’: Mandate
  • Condition: Dead
  • Date of Death: 11/09/2021
  • Time after ‘Vaccination’: 45 days
  • Profession: Paeditrician at GBUZ SO Novokuibyshevsk TsGB
  • Cause of Death: Official cause of death is pneumonia and thrombosis
  • Further Information: On 11/09/2021 in Novokuibyshevsk in Samarskaya region 74 year old Yevgenia Petrovna Kochetova, a paeditrician at GBUZ SO Novokuibyshevsk TsGB, died suddenly one and a half months after her second dose of the ‘vaccine’ of pneumonia and thrombosis.

Case 93

  • Name: Vladimir Mikhailovich Medvedev
  • Age: 74
  • Date of Birth: 09/08/1947
  • Region: Orenburgskaya
  • City: Buguruslan
  • Condition: Dead
  • Date of Death: 26/08/2021
  • Profession: Surgeon, lead doctor at MBUZ ‘BTsGB’
  • Further Information: On the 26/08/2021 in Buguruslan in Orenburgskaya region surgeon Vladimir Mikhailovich Medvedev suddenly died. According to local residents, he died after ‘vaccination’.

Case 94

  • Name: Nadezhda Konstantinovna Bondareva
  • Age: 75
  • Date of Birth: 11/05/1946
  • Region: Tverskaya
  • City: Kimry
  • Condition: Dead
  • Date of Death: 03/09/2021
  • Profession: Paediatrician at division of GBUZ TO Kimry Central Regional Hospital – Children’s Polyclinic No. 1
  • Cause of Death: Official cause of death is coronavirus infection
  • Further Information: On the 3rd of September in Kimry in Tver region 75-year-old Nadezhda Konstantinovna Bondareva, a paediatrician at division of GBUZ TO Kimry Central Regional Hospital – Children’s Polyclinic No. 1, died suddenly.

Case 95

  • Name: Alla Nikolayevna
  • Age: 76
  • Region: Voronezhskaya
  • City: Voronezh
  • ‘Vaccine’: Sputnik V
  • Reason for ‘Vaccination’: Voluntary
  • Condition: Dead
  • Dates of ‘Vaccination’: 14/07/2021 & 04/08/2021
  • Date of Death: 28/09/2021
  • Time after ‘Vaccination’: 55 days
  • Profession: Nurse
  • Cause of Death: Official cause of death is pulmonary edema induced by covid related pneumonia
  • Further Information: On the 28th August 2021, 55 days after being ‘vaccinated’ with Sputnik, 76-year-old Alla Nikolaevna suddenly died. Alla received her first ‘vaccination’ on the 14th July and her second on 4th August, on 19th September she fell ill with Covid-19. After 10 days pneumonia had eaten 99% of her lungs.

Case 96

  • Name: Larisa Petrovna Yegorina
  • Age: 77
  • Date of Birth: 13/04/1944
  • Region: Republic of Komi
  • City: Usinsk
  • Reason for ‘Vaccination’: Mandate
  • Condition: Dead
  • Date of Death: 30/07/2021
  • Time after ‘Vaccination’: 22 days.
  • Profession: Physiotherapy Nurse at the Physiotherapy department of GBUZ PK Usinsk Central Regional Hospital.
  • Further Information: In Usinsk 77-year-old physiotherapy Nurse at the Physiotherapy department of GBUZ PK Usinsk Central Regional Hospital, Larisa Petrovna Yegorina, died from coronavirus 22 days after injection with the experimental ‘vaccine’.

Case 97

  • Name: Boris Andreyevich Bukovkin
  • Age: 84
  • Region: Nizhegorodskaya
  • City: Nizhnii Novgorod
  • Condition: Dead
  • Date of Death: 30/10/2021
  • Profession: Doctor, Academic surgeon
  • Cause of Death: Official cause of death is coronavirus infection
  • Further Information: Let me give you sad news, 30/10/21. A great man, our colleague academic surgeon Boris Andreyevich Bukovkin has died from Covid. He was 84, he was ‘vaccinated’ in the summer.

Case 98

  • Name: Olga Viktorovna Khodyreva
  • Age: Unknown
  • Region: Kirovskaya
  • City: Kirovo-Chepetsk
  • ‘Vaccine’: Sputnik V
  • Condition: Dead
  • Date of Most Recent ‘Vaccination’: 17/07/2021
  • Date of Death: 30/07/2021
  • Profession: Kirov region medical worker
  • Cause of Death: Official cause of death is ischemia
  • Further Information: Hello. A tragedy happened. On the 30th July 2021, Olga Viktorovna Khodyreva died. On the 17th July she had received her second dose of Sputnik-V. She worked in Kirovo-Chepetsk as a medical worker. The cause of death was cardiac arrest in her sleep, she didn’t have any medical conditions.

Case 99

  • Name: Igor Yevgenovich Korolyov
  • Age: Unknown
  • Region: Moscow
  • City: Moscow
  • ‘Vaccine’: KoviVac
  • Condition: Dead
  • Date of Most Recent ‘Vaccination’: 24/07/2021
  • Date of Death: 15/08/2021
  • Time After ‘Vaccination’: 22 days.
  • Profession: Doctor at the Consultative-Diagnostic Centre No. 2 Department of Health Defense for the City of Moscow
  • Further Information: Complications begin on 25/07/2021. On 15th August Igor Yevgenovich Korolyov died from ‘vaccination’ – a doctor at the Consultative-Diagnostic Centre No. 2 Department of Health Defense for the City of Moscow. Throughout the pandemic he had worked with covid patients who were taken into hospital.

Case 100

  • Name: Surname unknown
  • Age: Unknown
  • Region: Moscow
  • City: Moscow
  • Condition: Dead
  • Date of Most Recent ‘Vaccination’: 25/06/2021
  • Date of Death: 26/06/2021
  • Time After ‘Vaccination’: 1 day.
  • Profession: Neurologist at the centre of Endo-surgery and Lithotripsy
  • Further Information: Complications begin 25/06/2021.

Case 101

  • Name: Yuri Grigorevich Svetlakov
  • Age: Unknown
  • Region: Perm
  • City: Osa
  • Reasons for ‘Vaccination’: Voluntary
  • Condition: Dead
  • Date of Death: 27/06/2021
  • Time After ‘Vaccination’: 21 days.
  • Profession: Paediatrician
  • Further Information: In the city of Osa in Perm region 3 weeks after vaccination, paediatrician Yuri Grigorevich Svetlakov suddenly died. According to his spouse, a week after ‘vaccination’ his autoimmune condition (myasthenia) started to get worse, he suffered cardiac arrest and died 10 days later in a coma in intensive care.

Case 102

  • Name: Yegor Viktorovich Polin
  • Age: Unknown
  • Region: Krasnodarskii
  • City: Sochi
  • Reason for ‘Vaccination’: Voluntary
  • Condition: Dead
  • Date of Most Recent ‘Vaccination’: 22/06/2021
  • Date of Death: 02/08/2021
  • Profession: Doctor as Sochi Hospital No. 4
  • Further Information: On 02/08/2021 the death of Yegor Viktorovich Polin became known. He worked as a doctor in City Hospital No. 4 in Sochi. On the 22nd June he wrote on his Instagram page that he was ‘vaccinated’. On the 3rd August the hospital website published his obituary.

Case 103

  • Name: Surname unknown
  • Age: Unknown
  • Region: Kursk
  • City: Kursk
  • Condition: Dead
  • Date of Death: 23/11/2021
  • Profession: Doctor at the Kursk Venereal Disease Dispensary
  • Cause of Death: More than 90% lung injury, official cause of death is coronavirus.
  • Further Information: The deputy governor of Kursk Oblast Andrei Beloctotskii told the story of the death of a regional doctor at the venereal disease dispensary in a meeting of the operational staff. He said that she had had two doses of the ‘vaccine’ already in February. More than half a year passed. She recently became ill, her lung function was injured by 90%.

Case 104

  • Name: Althea Rifkhatovna Ismagilova
  • Age: Unknown
  • Region: Republic of Bashkortostan
  • City: Ufa
  • Condition: Dead
  • Date of Death: 20/11/2021
  • Profession: Paediatrician at the children’s department No. 3 GBUZ RB City Children’s Clinical Hospital No. 17.
  • Further Information: On the 20th November 2021 in Ufa in the Republic of Bashkortostan, Althea Rifkhatovna Ismagilova, a paediatrician at the children’s department No. 3 GBUZ RB City Children’s Clinical Hospital No. 17, died suddenly.

Case 105

  • Name: Surname unknown
  • Age: Unknown
  • Region: Kaluzhskaya
  • City: Kaluga
  • Condition: Dead
  • Profession: Lead doctor at Kaluzhskaya ambulance service
  • Further Information: Date of ‘vaccination’: 04/01/2021. Complications begin 08/01/2021. On the evening of the 8th January the lead doctor at Kaluzhskaya ambulance service and trauma doctor Viktoria Kardash died from complications, caused by coronavirus. A few days before she died she was in intensive care with coronavirus.

Case 106

  • Name: Alexander Anatolevich Stolbov
  • Age: Unknown
  • Region: Ulyanovskaya
  • City: Ulyanovsk
  • Condition: Dead
  • Date of Death: 26/02/2021
  • Profession: Surgeon
  • Further Information: On the 26th February 2021 surgeon Alexander Anatolevich Stolbov suddenly died alone in the hospital in Podmoskovye. He died a month after taking the experimental Covid-19 injection.

Case 107

  • Name: Surname unknown
  • Age: Unknown
  • Region: Magadanskaya
  • City: Ola
  • Condition: Dead
  • Profession: Paediatrician in the town of Ola
  • Further Information: Date of ‘vaccination’ was in March 2021. On the 23rd August we heard of the death of a paediatrician in the town of Ola in Magadanskaya region. In March 2021 the doctor had two doses of the ‘vaccination’ and in July they became ill.

Case 108

  • Name: Alexander Alexandrovich Grigoryev
  • Age: Unknown
  • Region: Voronezhskaya
  • City: Borisoglebsk
  • Condition: Dead
  • Date of Death: 06/10/2021
  • Profession: Doctor of the mobile brigade of the department of the ambulance service BUZ VO Borisoglebsk RB, teacher at medical college.
  • Cause of Death: Official cause of death is sudden cardiac arrest
  • Further Information: On the 6th October 2021 in Borisoglebsk in Voronezhskaya region, Alexander Alexandrovich Grigoryev, a doctor of the mobile brigade of the department of the ambulance service BUZ VO Borisoglebsk RB and teacher at medical college, suddenly died.

Case 109

  • Name: Lyudmila Viktorovna Belova
  • Age: Unknown
  • Region: Novgorodskaya
  • City: Velikii Novgorod
  • Condition: Dead
  • Profession: Oncologist
  • Further Information: A resident of Velikii Novogorod talked about the death of Lyudmila Viktorovna Belova, an oncologist at Regional Clinical Oncological Dispensary in Velikii Novgorod, who died on 08/09/2021 from thrombosis after their second dose of the ‘vaccine’.

Case 110

  • Name: Lyaisan Yusupova
  • Age: Unknown
  • Region: Republic of Bashkortostan
  • City: Ufa
  • ‘Vaccine’: Sputnik V
  • Condition: Ill
  • Profession: Doctor and plastic surgeon
  • Further Information: Doctor and plastic surgeon Lyaisan Yusupova talked about her battle with coronavirus on social media.

Case 111

  • Name: Masrut Mazitovich Shamsutdinov
  • Age: Unknown
  • Region: Republic of Bashkortostan
  • City: Sterlitamak
  • Condition: Dead
  • Date of Death: 13/08/2021
  • Profession: Doctor – phthisiatrician, the former lead doctor at GBUZ Sterlitamak Inter Regional Anti-Tuberculosis Dispensary
  • Cause of Death: Official cause of death is coronavirus infection
  • Further Information: On the 13th August 2021 in Sterlitamak in the Republic of Bashkortostan, Masrut Mazitovich Shamsutdinov, a phthisiatrician, the former lead doctor at GBUZ Sterlitamak Inter Regional Anti-Tuberculosis Dispensary, died suddenly from Covid-19.

Case 112

  • Name: Vyacheslav Filippovich Kolyadenko
  • Age: Unknown
  • Region: Saratovskaya
  • City: Saratov
  • Condition: Dead
  • Date of Death: 01/08/2021
  • Profession: Former lead at department of children’s illnesses at Saratov Medical Institute
  • Further Information: Date of vaccination: in May 2021. On the 1st August 2021 in Saratov the vaccinated Vyacheslav Filippovich Kolyadenko, former lead at department of children’s illnesses at Saratov Medical Institute between 1987 and 2003, died. He graduated from the Saratov Medical Institute in 1964, he worked as a paediatrician in Novosibirsk in 1973.

Case 113

  • Name: Galina Ivanovna Makarova
  • Age: Unknown
  • Region: Republic of Bashkortostan
  • City: Sterlitamak
  • Condition: Dead
  • Date of Death: 18/09/2021
  • Profession: ENT doctor at GBUZ RB City Hospital No. 2 in the city of Sterlitamak
  • Cause of Death: Official cause of death is coronavirus infection
  • Further Information: On the 18th September 2021 in Sterlitamak in the Republic of Bashkortostan, Galina Ivanovna Makarova, an ENT doctor at GBUZ RB City Hospital No. 2 in the city of Sterlitamak, died suddenly from Covid-19

Case 114

  • Name: Elena Andreyevna Rybalkina
  • Age: Unknown
  • Region: Chelyabinskaya
  • City: Magnitogorsk
  • Condition: Dead
  • Date of Death: 07/09/2021
  • Profession: Dentist at OOO ‘Stomateks’
  • Cause of Death: Official cause of death is myocardiopathy
  • Further Information: On the 7th September 2021 in Magnitogorsk in Chelyabinskaya Elena Andreyevna Rybalkina, a dentist at OOO ‘Stomateks’, suddenly died.

That Bullshit in The Atlantic

I wasn’t going to do another post so soon, but the Atlantic posted an article on declaring ‘a pandemic amnesty’. Or, to put it in simpler terms, that the people who were right about everything – the anti-lockdown, anti-‘vaccine’, anti-mask, anti-coercion people – need to forgive those poor souls who were screaming at us that we were granny killers for the last two-and-a-half years.

Yeah? How about no.

So, let’s break this down. Yeah, I know every anti-scamdemic substack is doing one of these but you’re getting another one from me anyway.

The author starts by talking about hikes they went on in April 2020 because they were bloody bored shitless because of the lockdown. This I can understand, because I was also bored shitless because of the lockdown and went on walks purely because the government said that that’s what I shouldn’t be doing. That said, I doubt the author wanted to kill themselves because of these totalitarian lockdowns, and I did, so you know, I’m already losing sympathy. Anyway, she brainwashed her kid to scream at strangers about social distancing and to shove a mask over their face if anyone got too close.

Outdoor transmission was vanishingly rare. Our cloth masks made out of old bandanas wouldn’t have done anything, anyway. But the thing is: We didn’t know.

Ah, yes, the ‘I was just ignorant’ defense. Except, this person is meant to be a University Lecturer, so I am sure that they are capable of finding a scientific study. Unless I am seriously overestimating the intelligence of university lecturers, that is, which wouldn’t surprise me since most of them these days can’t define the word ‘woman’.

So, what does the scientific literature on cloth masks actually say?

This study is the first RCT of cloth masks, and the results caution against the use of cloth masks. This is an important finding to inform occupational health and safety. Moisture retention, reuse of cloth masks and poor filtration may result in increased risk of infection. 

I thought we were supposed to be listening to ‘THE SCIENCE‘. But the main point is, if Ryan Cristian could find this study, I’m pretty certain some University Lecturer can find it.

We’ve spent several lectures reliving the first year of the pandemic, discussing the many important choices we had to make under conditions of tremendous uncertainty.

Uncertainty? Uncertainty? There was zero uncertainty on my part because I knew it was bullshit. And I didn’t get to make any choices because I was locked in my house by decree of these assholes.

She then goes on to talk about schools:

But in spring and summer 2020, we had only glimmers of information. Reasonable people—people who cared about children and teachers—advocated on both sides of the reopening debate.

Anyone with a brain knew that a) children don’t die from Covid-19 unless they are already severely ill, and b) that shutting schools would be an absolute disaster for the children, would stunt their social growth, and would affect poorer kids the worst due to lack of support and technology and c) that shutting down schools locked children with abusive parents in with those parents 24/7 with no one to perform any safeguarding functions. It wasn’t some secret.

And of course, the people arguing for ‘shut the schools’ were far from reasonable. And they did not care about children, they cared about themselves, and were willing to throw children under the bus to get what they want, i.e. sitting at home and doing fuck all and being paid by the state to do fuck all. While wearing 10 masks and dunking their head periodically in a bucket of hand san in between the Game of Thrones binge watch sessions, of course.

And now we come to the most insane claim in the article:

Another example: When the vaccines came out, we lacked definitive data on the relative efficacies of the Johnson & Johnson shot versus the mRNA options from Pfizer and Moderna. The mRNA vaccines have won out. But at the time, many people in public health were either neutral or expressed a J&J preference. This misstep wasn’t nefarious. It was the result of uncertainty.

This is how this article chooses to address the topic of the ‘vaccines’. This. Where do I even start with this?

Note what the author does not do here. They do not bring up any of the side effects of the jabs, not even the ones that are admitted to by the government and media, such as myocarditis or blood clots. Not even in some sort of bullshitty way that you might expect, such as ‘We didn’t know there were super-super-super-super rare side effects like myocarditis and a few people got harmed by this’.

No, they choose to frame it as the question of whether J&J is better than mRNA. When ‘Died Suddenly’ cases are through the roof. When excess death is skyrocketing in heavily ‘vaccinated’ countries and it clearly isn’t Covid. As I said in a previous article, ‘Vaccine’ Side Effect Narrative Management and the Mainstream Media:

[T]he extreme danger of these injections was clear to anyone paying attention very quickly. Testimony quickly popped up online alleging mass death in care homes after the jabs. Vaccine injury stories began to pop up on TikTok, Facebook and Twitter from January 2021, for example testimony from Shawn Skelton, Angelia Desselle and Kristi Simmonds, interviewed by Del Bigtree back in April 2021. Death and injury reports in the US Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS) began to skyrocket early on in the rollout. In other words, anyone paying attention could figure out these jabs were extremely dangerous by February 2021.

Of course, this barely even qualifies as ‘narrative management’ at this point since they aren’t even trying to ‘manage’ the death reports, they are just pretending that they don’t exist.

Even on its own limited terms I’m not convinced this is even true, since the mRNA seemed preferred from the start.

Obviously some people intended to mislead and made wildly irresponsible claims.

But not our government and our media and saints like Our St Anthony Fauci, no, not those people. Just ‘conspiracy theorists’ online and maybe Trump.

The people who got it right, for whatever reason, may want to gloat.

Damn right I do.

Those who got it wrong, for whatever reason, may feel defensive and retrench into a position that doesn’t accord with the facts. All of this gloating and defensiveness continues to gobble up a lot of social energy and to drive the culture wars, especially on the internet. 

These people called us scum. They called us plague rats. They called us granny killers. They wished death on us for not taking the ‘vaccine’. They wanted to sack us for not taking the ‘vaccine’. They wanted to exclude us from society for not taking the ‘vaccine’. They wanted to strap us down and forcibly inject us with their poison ‘vaccine’. And then they complain that we gloat when we are vindicated.

And they dare complain about culture wars? They created the damn ‘culture war’. Most of us ‘vaccine’ sceptics tried to convince our families not to take it, but we couldn’t stop them. If people want to kill themselves with these jabs, there’s nothing we can do. We weren’t the ones cutting people out of our families for taking the jab. We weren’t the ones threatening employees with the sack for taking the jab. We were defending ourselves.

In the face of so much uncertainty, getting something right had a hefty element of luck. And, similarly, getting something wrong wasn’t a moral failing. 

There was absolutely no luck involved in predicting that lockdowns would destroy the economy and massively increase poverty. Anyone with two brain cells could predict that. There was also no luck involved in predicting that a novel product with rushed safety testing may have negative side effects. Common sense is not luck. And no, being incorrect about the jabs because you were duped by the MSM isn’t really a moral failing per se. But it is a moral failing to support forced jabs against medical ethics and bodily autonomy which this author has glossed over in her article.

Treating pandemic choices as a scorecard on which some people racked up more points than others is preventing us from moving forward.

Yes, it’s those ‘evil anti-vaxxers’ who are the problem. We are just too obnoxious about being right and we should shut up. We need to ‘move forward’ by forgetting the ‘vaccine’-injured, the dead from ‘vaccines’ and the dead from lockdowns. No. Now there is a moral failing for you.

Many people have neglected their health care over the past several years.

No. Many people were denied healthcare by lockdowns. But that is the individuals’ fault and not the fault of the psychopaths who denied them the healthcare according to the author. Just watch those Tik Tok dances and shut up.

Notably, routine vaccination rates for children (for measles, pertussis, etc.) are way down. Rather than debating the role that messaging about COVID vaccines had in this decline, we need to put all our energy into bringing these rates back up. Pediatricians and public-health officials will need to work together on community outreach, and politicians will need to consider school mandates.

Yes, you read that correctly. The author’s suggestion for ending the ‘culture war’ about forced jabs is forced jabs for your children.

This makes it clear that the author has no remorse for promoting forcing the covid injections. As such, they are promoting this idea as a way of avoiding accountability for being involved in the covid scam as an MSM stooge, which paid an important role in promoting the official narrative.

Now, my unvaxxed arse is gonna go gloat some more, see you later.

Anti Covid Measures Protest Leicester 29 October 2022

Before we get into this, the content I took of this protest is my first censorship on YouTube. This is for breaching the ‘medical misinformation’ policy, i.e. speakers suggesting that individuals have died from the Covid-19 ‘vaccines’. For the record, I have 19 subscribers on there, so apparently that is a threat to their narrative:

While the video called ‘Vaccine’ Deaths was about people ‘dying suddenly’ and other related things, the Debbie Hicks video was not primarily about the jabs, but about the NHS denying people care under the pretext of ‘Covid’, which I have experienced myself so know for a fact did happen. She only mentioned jab deaths as an aside from the main argument, so I am not sure if it is the aside on the jabs or the questioning of Our NHS(TM) that got the video censored.

Needless to say, I will no longer upload any Covid-related videos to YouTube and all footage from the Leicester protest on there has been deleted. I don’t want my account banned purely because I don’t want to make a new account to have to follow people on there. My Covid protest footage will now be only available on Odysee, Bitchute and Rumble.

The Tribe of Leicester are a group that run weekly events outside the Clock Tower in Leicester city centre. Here’s a selection of some of the protest signs that they use at events:

I’m sure this Muslim woman is a white supremacist according to our media.
Covid ‘Vaccine’ victims.

Today they had a couple of outside speakers at the event. Debbie Hicks (the woman who filmed an empty hospital in Gloustershire) and Piers Corbyn. Dr. Mohammad Adil was due to speak but was advised not to by his lawyers (for the unaware, Dr. Adil was suspended from the NHS early on in the ‘pandemic’ as he doubts the existence of the sars-cov-2 virus). I knew Hicks was due to speak but I did not know Corbyn was.

I have a lot of footage from the protest uploaded. The main themes were the deaths and injuries caused by the ‘vaccination’ program and the ‘died suddenly’ cases, the importance of cash and fighting back against digital currency and the World Economic Forum. Piers Corbyn spoke about several different topics, climate change, covid-19, Just Stop Oil and the RMT strikes.

Video footage is available on my channels, just don’t go to YouTube.

‘Vaccine’ Side Effect Narrative Management and the Mainstream Media

Introduction

Covid-19 ‘vaccine’ side effects are extremely common. According to Pfizer’s own documentation, there is a 9-page list of possible side effects of the mRNA jabs. The state, media, and international actors, however, were determined to get the entire population jabbed. Some of this involved direct coercion, such as sacking care home workers and threatening to sack NHS staff. However, a large part of convincing people to get ‘vaccinated’ for Covid relied on the mainstream media, and in particular how that media dealt with claims of side effects from the Covid jabs.

The Function of the Media

Despite various protestations from the media that their job is to present the truth and hold the establishment to account, in reality they act as a crucial part of that establishment. Their role is to present narratives that support the establishment in a palatable way, and to keep any debate within very narrow grounds (the territory of what Ryan Cristian has dubbed the ‘two party illusion’). The mainstream media’s compliance with government narratives is ensured in multiple ways, including overlap of interests, financial incentives via advertising, cultural commonality and plain laziness (such as it being easy to spout government press releases as ‘news’). In the last analysis, it can also be maintained through state force – witness what happened to Julian Assange when he released information about US war crimes.

The Beginning of the Jab Rollout

The UK mainstream media – with very few exceptions (Peter Hitchens is the only example that comes to mind) – backed lockdowns from Day 1, and in fact pushed for harder and longer lockdowns. Lockdown sceptics were smeared as conspiracy theorists and mocked. But this was only a taste of what was to come with the miracle jab.

The idea of a vaccine has always been promoted by some people as the ultimate way out of lockdowns. Initially, the government itself did not put as much emphasis on ‘vaccination’ as the way out of lockdowns, given that they were still pretending lockdown would be only short term. This narrative became more and more important as lockdowns dragged on, with the government and media trying to encourage compliance with the lockdowns by urging that we would soon have the ‘vaccine’ and give it to enough people and that the nightmare would then be over.

The media portrayed the ‘race for the vaccine’ in a positive way, as the hero pharmaceutical companies that were going to save us from the deadly plague. Any problems, such as a case of transverse myelitis during the Oxford/AstraZeneca ‘vaccine’ trial, were quickly smoothed over and forgotten about. The media was happy to repeat claims from the manufacturers of the injections. This BBC article, while it does suggest in a mealy-mouthed way that the data is limited further down the article, it does say that it is safe and likely to be highly effective (referring to the Pfizer product).

With the availability of the jab, this started to go into overdrive. The first man to be given the jab in the UK outside of clinical trials was called William Shakespeare. This was manufactured and used in order to give a positive view of the ‘vaccine’. While a BBC article contained many puns on Shakespeare works, the actual purpose of this propaganda was to associate the ‘vaccine’ with one of the greatest British figures in history. The respect that a large number of British people have for Shakespeare is subconsciously transferred to the jab by this manipulation (or at least, that is the intention). There are also further attempts to use patriotic ideas as a means to promote the jab, in particular by bragging about the British ‘vaccine success’ compared to the continent, as Britain had given the vaccine to many more people early on in the rollout.

Drips and Drabs: The Beginning of the Catastrophe

Despite the constant praise for the jabs, the extreme danger of these injections was clear to anyone paying attention very quickly. Testimony quickly popped up online alleging mass death in care homes after the jabs. Vaccine injury stories began to pop up on TikTok, Facebook and Twitter from January 2021, for example testimony from Shawn Skelton, Angelia Desselle and Kristi Simmonds, interviewed by Del Bigtree back in April 2021. Death and injury reports in the US Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS) began to skyrocket early on in the rollout. In other words, anyone paying attention could figure out these jabs were extremely dangerous by February 2021.

How did the media deal with these reports of side effects from these novel mRNA injections? The most obvious response is to stonewall all cases of major negative side effects, and indeed we do see aspects of this. If I search on google (as this is what non-conspiracy theorists are likely to be using) for ‘covid 19 vaccine side effects’, I find standard pages from the NHS downplaying the risks of the jab.

Holding Back the Flood?: The Case of the Astra Zeneca Blood Clots

However, a strategy of denying all side effects (other than the minor ones like a sore arm) was not credible. Instead, the mainstream media employed a strategy well known in the media: to acknowledge the critique but focus down on a very small aspect in order to whitewash the whole.

This technique of narrative management was identified by Chomsky and Herman in their famous work, Manufacturing Consent. They give an example from the Vietnam War. When criticism of the war in 1960s America began to become more prominent, the media could not completely ignore the crimes being committed against the Vietnamese people. So, the media focused in on one atrocity that took place during the war, the massacre carried out at My Lai by American soldiers. The point of the media drawing so much attention to this crime was to isolate it from the rest of the war, to make it into an exceptional event. This served to whitewash the fact that the complete destruction of Vietnamese villages and murder and rape of civilians were standard American practice.

It is this form of narrative management that we first observe when the reports of adverse events start to drip out over the first few months of the rollout. They picked one specific side effect – the blood clots reported after the AstraZeneca jab – and used that to obscure all of the other side effects being reported after both types of ‘vaccine’ (the beginning of the rollout in the UK was AstraZeneca and Pfizer, with some Moderna added later). They looked only at the risk of this one side effect, declared it to be rare, and then claimed based on this that the ‘vaccines’ were safe. Simply ignoring all claims of side effects would cause them to lose credibility, while acknowledgement of this one point allowed them to maintain credibility and make it look as if they are allowing some degree of criticism and debate. We must remember that this period in time was crucial, as it was important to the establishment to get as many people to take the jab as possible, and at this point, only older age groups had taken the ‘vaccine’.

As such, reports such as the following cropped up in the mainstream media:

Unusual blood clots in the brain have been detected in a handful of people after they were injected with the Oxford-AstraZeneca vaccine. […]

The organisation [European Medicines Agency] has to figure out whether the reported clots are a side-effect or a coincidence that would have happened naturally. This is incredibly hard when dealing with rare events. If, on the other hand, one in every 10,000 people was having serious blood clots then the answer would be obvious.

BBC

The British Government’s website contains a statement addressing the AstraZeneca jab from the 7th April 2021:

There have been reports of an extremely rare adverse event of concurrent thrombosis (blood clots) and thrombocytopenia (low platelet count) following vaccination with the first dose of AstraZeneca ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 vaccine (AZD1222). There has been no signal for thrombosis/thrombocytopenia following receipt of other COVID-19 vaccines approved for use in the UK (Pfizer-BioNTech and Moderna).

Note the declaration that this side effect has not been observed with the Pfizer or Moderna ‘vaccines’ – which is false. It is however convenient, as it allows the establishment to scapegoat the AstraZeneca jab for all problems, while pushing the Pfizer and Moderna.

The media also went as far as to publish testimonies of those injured by Vaccine Induced Thrombotic Thrombocytopenia, while stressing the rarity of such a side effect:

Osteopath Joseph Robinson, 32, suffered brain damage from a rare blood clot after his first AstraZeneca dose in February.

He had to quit work after VITT – vaccine-induced thrombotic thrombocytopenia – left him with memory loss and speech and language impairments.

Today’s Reality: Sudden Adult Death Syndrome

The media strategies worked on the vast majority of people. Official data on the number of people in the UK who took a Covid jab can be debated, with conflicting numbers from different sources, as well as some exaggeration of numbers jabbed for propaganda purposes. However, it is clear that the majority of people took at least the first 2 doses of the covid jabs.

Nowadays, we have a different type of media propaganda, focusing on reassuring the minds of people who have taken the jabs that it was the right decision. No one is trying to convince the unvaccinated with rational argument at this point – if they ever were. Meanwhile, a massive amount of unexplained death is happening all across the world. Mark Crispin Miller on Substack has been chronicling the masses of people who are now ‘dying suddenly’, often with no cause of death mentioned in the news coverage. These include people of all ages, races and a large number of different countries.

The media, on the other hand, is trying to ignore this mass death as much as possible, while also trying to normalise random heart attacks and dropping dead. The ‘health story’ has been a long-term fixture of the British media – with the fact that the Daily Mail always runs stories about everything causing cancer being a running joke. (That said, in retrospect, given how toxic everything is perhaps they had a point). Now, these often-bizarre health stories are focusing on heart attacks, with a number complied here by Naked Emperor:

BBC – Devoted football fans experience ‘dangerous’ levels of stress

Express – Heart attack: Does skipping breakfast increase your risk?

Daily Mail – Expert warns that shovelling snow can be a deadly way to discover underlying cardiovascular conditions as straining the heart with physical activity could cause sudden death

Of course, none of these articles mention the ‘vaccine’ even though the British government admit that the jabs can cause heart issues.

Most likely these stories are being published because more heart attacks are being observed by ordinary people in their lives and it serves to associate the heart attack with anything other than the jab. Even if the reader thinks these stories are stupid, they may still have a subconscious effect somewhere. (Though, sometimes, these stories are so idiotic that I wonder if they almost want you to know subconsciously what has been done to you – if you took the jab – and for you to live in terror of dropping dead any minute.)

The media are also playing a role in normalising ‘Sudden Adult Death Syndrome’ (SADS) meaning when an adult suddenly dies with no clear cause of death. A large number of these deaths are most likely jab induced. As Mark Crispin Miller has observed in his series, no cause of death being listed is becoming much more common in death articles in the mainstream media. The media is currently running generic articles on SADS, claiming that people should get their heart looked at if they are at risk:

People aged under 40 are being urged to have their hearts checked because they may potentially be at risk of Sudden Adult Death Syndrome. 

The syndrome, known as SADS, has been fatal for all kinds of people regardless of whether they maintain a fit and healthy lifestyle.

Daily Mail

Conclusion

The media serves as an important way to manage the narrative around the Covid-19 ‘vaccines’: both in order to encourage uptake, deflect from side effects and normalise the carnage being caused by these extremely dangerous products.

What’s Going on in Ukraine? Part 4: The Corona Connection (2)

Introduction

The previous parts of this series have discussed the Western and Russian narratives surrounding the conflict in Ukraine. The Western narrative, as usual, is full of untruths about the situation in Ukraine, ignoring intervention by the West and pretending that the bombing of civilians in Donbass doesn’t exist. The Russian narrative is more in line with reality as it acknowledges Western aggression and the suffering of people in the Donbass. However, the Russian government’s promotion of the Official Covid Narrative, including lockdowns and forced ‘vaccinations’, mean scepticism of the Russian government is warranted. This situation has led people to speculate about the role of orchestration in the Ukraine conflict.

The Model Before the Official Covid Narrative

One of the key questions relating to the current situation in Ukraine is how we assess foreign policy – and particularly questions of international collusion – in the wake of the Covid 19 scam. Prior to Covid 19 it was accurate to frame foreign policy around Western imperialism and resistance to that imperialism as the model. Imperialist invasions took place in Iraq, Libya, and Afghanistan, imperialist subversion in Syria, imperialist occupation in Palestine, and imperialist coups in Honduras and Bolivia. All of these events had significant economic and resource gains for Western elites. On the other hand, independent minded governments resisted this subversion. This included Islamic governments (like Iran), right wing governments (like Russia), secular Arab governments (like Iraq or Syria) and left wing governments (like Cuba, Venezuela, or Bolivia).

In particular, once Russia began to regain some economic and military strength after the disaster of the 1990s, they began to slowly push back against the West. It is worth noting, however, that Putin’s views have become more hostile to the West over time and he did not begin his tenure as implacably anti-Western. For example, in a New York Times interview in 2003, Putin expressed his desire for good relations with the US, while considering the war in Iraq as an error:

I have already mentioned strategic stability. The United States and Russia remain the strongest nuclear powers. Our interests in the sphere of fighting radicalism and terrorism coincide, and we are very much concerned about the radicalisation of certain countries and certain regions. Our common interest lies in counteracting one of the main threats of the 21st century – proliferation of weapons of mass destruction.

[…]

You know our attitude toward the war in Iraq; I have made it public. I said from the very beginning and still believe that it was a mistake. This is why there is no surprise for us about the situation that has taken shape because we foresaw the development of the situation there just exactly as it is developing now. First of all, this has to do with the political aspect, the collapse of the statehood, as you correctly mentioned. How could one imagine a different course of events in case the Saddam Hussain regime is dismantled? Of course, statehood is destroyed. How can it be otherwise? But what do the special services have to do with it?

Vladimir Putin

Putin became more hostile as the lack of cooperation from the West and the disdain for Russian interests became more and more obvious with the expansion of NATO and the undermining of the government of Bashar Al Assad, a long time Russian ally. Russia militarily intervened in Syria (with the permission of the Syrian government) to fight the Western supported terrorist groups such as ISIS, Al Nusra and the White Helmets.

Collusion and Competition?

However, both sides complying with the Covid Narrative raises questions about this model of geopolitical competition. The fact is that almost all countries (excluding Belarus, Sweden, and some African countries whose leaders died in mysterious circumstances) went along with lockdowns and all Western countries, Russia and China supported the jabs. The question at issue here is the idea of global conspiracy in the creation of a fake pandemic in order to institute a global control grid of digital IDs, transhumanism, and full spectrum authoritarian control, broadly called ‘The Great Reset’.

The fact that the vast majority of countries complied with these anti -health directives in the name of health has to arouse suspicion. If a few countries had done lockdowns, or many countries had done them but for a short period, incompetence would seem a more plausible explanation, but the sheet length of the life destroying lockdowns combined with sinister legislation suggests the possibility of conspiracy.

In reality, there is evidence that both phenomena exist simultaneously: geopolitical maneuvering is real, but so is a push towards some sort of ‘great reset’ type scenario among certain elite groups. The best model to adopt to understand the current scenario is one in which countries are competing within themselves (largely the West, Russia and China) while all supporting some aspects of a digital control grid. Groups like the World Economic Forum have relevance within this matrix, as they drive an ideological agenda forward and facilitate liaison between different elites (Davos, etc.).

The best analogy I can think of is this: In the 19th century, all the major European states (France, Germany, Britain et al.) supported the concept of having colonies. However, they all competed over who had the most colonies and therefore the most access to natural resources, cheap labour etc. Sometimes these countries would come together and make agreements regulating colonialism (a form of collusion) but they would also try to undermine each other’s imperial power. In this analogy the belief in colonies and the collusion would equal agreeing on the great reset and colluding at meetings such as Davos, whereas the competition plays out in areas such as Ukraine and Syria for dominance by different powers.

Relevance of Imperialism

Only seeing one side of the coin as real leads to mistakes in analysis. Ultimately I don’t think all geopolitical competition has disappeared with the Covid narrative, regardless of the elements of bizarre international agreement on the issue. Different interests of different countries – such as economic or geostrategic – still function as a relevant mode of analysis.

The Western (that is, US and its lackey countries such as the UK, etc) imperialist drive inevitably brings it into conflict with other countries. The imperialist nature of the West – that is, their need and ability to exploit peripheral countries – is not something that can be arbitrarily abolished as it evolved out of the capitalist system and the dominance of these powers over that system. In fact, there is ample evidence of the continuation of imperialist warfare and exploitation despite ‘Covid-19’ (see my previous article on ‘Mass Murder ‘In The Middle of a Deadly Pandemic”).

One of the countries it must come into conflict with is Russia, despite the similarities in domestic policy between the two powers when it comes to Covid 19. Despite some claims to the contrary, Russia is not an imperialist power, and it is misleading to portray it as such just because it invaded Ukraine. Just because one country militarily intervenes in another does not automatically make that intervention ‘imperialist’ unless you want to argue absurdities such as Vietnam being an imperialist power (as they invaded Cambodia in the 1970s). Russia is not economically powerful enough to compete as an imperialist state and it does not have masses of finance capital it can use to exploit other countries through neocolonialism. Instead, it is a middling country that finds itself in conflict with the West because they constantly threaten Russia’s borders.

These conflicting interests remain real and cannot be ignored as a driver of Western and Russian actions. The fact that these conflicting interests exist means that theories of direct collusion (such as collusion to create a distraction in Ukraine, for example) are less plausible unless there is direct evidence. There is enough reason for the two powers to compete without having to use direct collusion as an explanation.

Relevance of Global Elites

While we should be careful in attributing every action during the ‘Covid-19 pandemic’ to conspiracy, there is some evidence for that position. The fact that the US government ran a pandemic exercise called Event 201 “which predicted a global pandemic caused by a novel Coronavirus just months before the Covid-19 outbreak” – is suspicious. (Interestingly, there was also a Monkeypox simulation exercise). Ultimately I find it difficult to explain the Covid-19 scam through opportunism alone, given the fact that a large number of states went along with it for such a long period of time. Particularly the clear transhumanist drive present within all aspects of the Covid agenda shows a unified elite ideology being driven by individuals like Klaus Schwab, leader of the World Economic Forum.

Organisations like The Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation and the World Economic Forum are using Covid-19 to push sinister global agendas. In fact, this barely qualifies as a ‘conspiracy’ since they are open about the fact that this is what they are doing (Schwab literally wrote a book called ‘The Great Reset’, how much more open do you want?). Bill Gates clearly wants to use the ‘pandemic’ to push vaccines, one of his most notable interests, and there is also evidence he has an interest in depopulation. Schwab argues for a transhumanist future under the ‘Fourth Industrial Revolution‘, where human beings meld with technology and where genetic editing is normalised. Covid-19 is considered a method to bring about this future. Groups like the WEF and BMGF infiltrate and fund initiatives within states (for example, the WEF uses the Young Global Leaders program to groom people into its ideology, whereas the BMGF uses money to fund initiatives it supports).

The weaknesses of focusing mainly on these organisations is that they do not have direct methods of enforcement (militaries, police forces, etc.) that can force the population to obey. Only states have those. States have to have some interest in imposition of the policies also to ensure their implementation. So what we have, in my view, is a system based on mutual overlapping interests. This includes between governments, global institutions (WHO, WEF, BMGF etc) and big corporations such as Big Pharma, Big Tech and the arms companies. These mutual overlapping interests involve means by which to control the population (vaccine passports, Digital ID’s, lockdowns, smart cities, technocracy) as well as transhumanism (the US and UK governments are interested in ‘human augmentation’), and of course the big corporations benefit through increased profit and mandated markets for their products.

Conclusion

There are both circles of overlapping and competing interests when it comes to understanding the operations of the modern world and neither can be dismissed out of hand as an influence on the behaviour of states. Ultimately Russia’s behaviour in Ukraine can be explained via traditional geopolitical motives. However elites in most countries (including Russia) have an interest in the transhumanist digital control matrix being pushed by such elites. Contra to some claims in the independent media, I see no evidence that Russia is opposed to the fundamentals of transhumanist technocracy.

Leicester Protest With John O’Looney: 4th June 2022

I saw this protest advertised on the Stand Up X website and thought I’d go being as Leicester isn’t far away and there were actually trains running. The main focus of this protest was a 20 minute or so speech from John O’Looney.

For anyone who is not familiar with John O’Looney, though I assume most readers are, he is an undertaker who came to question the Covid Narrative through his work. Basically, his main observations are as such:

  • O’Looney states he observed no increase in overall death in 2020 while we were allegedly ‘in the middle of a deadly pandemic’;
  • He also states he saw a massive increase in death for the first 12 weeks of 2021 (i.e. during the beginning of the Covid 19 jab rollout).

He did an interview which was posted on Bitchute and got a large amount of views which outlined his perspective as an undertaker. It was originally published in September 2021.

It was a small protest in Leicester city centre, at the ‘Clock Tower’. 100-150 people standing around in a circle in the square. I recognised some attendees from Birmingham protests I have been to before.

This was the only anti-covid narrative protest I have been to where there was quite a lot of people disagreeing with the protesters. There were quite a few people who shouted stuff like ‘follow the science’ and ‘you want to kill people’ at the protest. Yes those literal actual tropes. Some guy even ripped up a copy of ‘The Light’ Paper. There were some other people who were more willing to take the leaflets and papers. Someone else engaged one of the protesters on the topic of collapsing athletes, due to the below sign:

There were some overlap in attendees and speakers with the Birmingham and Wolverhampton protests I previously attended.

If you want to watch footage from the protest, it is uploaded on my Youtube and Bitchute accounts, including the full speech by John O’Looney.

The Snobbery of the Covid Narrative and Its Functions

Introduction

The Official Covid Narrative, the idea that Covid-19 is an extremely dangerous disease that requires severe mitigation strategies such as lockdown, views human beings as simply disease carriers. However, some categories of people are viewed more as disease carriers than others by the official narrative, and specifically by the believers in that narrative. The narrative itself is inherently linked to certain middle and upper class attitudes about the working classes and their beliefs and pursuits. This is seen through the demonisation of working class people for carrying out ordinary everyday activities and for being sceptical of big pharma.

The Great Unwashed

From 23 March 2020, near the entirety of the country was compliant with Boris Johnson’s draconian lockdowns. As someone who was a sceptic of the narrative from the beginning, it was depressing and almost hopeless to see the state of the country at that time.

The first possible signs of actual social life came about through the suggestion of V.E. Day anniversary celebrations. 8th May 2020 marked the 75th anniversary of the defeat of Nazi Germany, so at that point the British people had endured about 6 weeks of lockdown. This was the first sign of life in the country since the beginning of the tyranny.

This is when the middle class handwringing started. The idea of celebrating V.E. Day does not suit middle class Remainer sensibilities, as they consider it to be too nationalistic. They already had a negative conception of the ‘insular’ working class who largely voted for Brexit, so they were already psychologically primed for mass demonisation. And now the working class were to commit the mortal sin in the minds of middle class hypochondriacs: going outside to celebrate a holiday.

Furthermore, there were images of packed beaches from the late spring and summer of 2020. The media salivated over these images, mocking and cursing those who went to the beach. This article provides an example of such strategies, entitled ‘Bournemouth raises alarm as huge crowds ignore COVID advice and flock to the coast’. People having a good time in good weather is now considered to be a ‘major incident’.

The Great Unjabbed

Since the rollout of the Covid 19 injections to the population at large, the demonisation has been squarely aimed at the unjabbed. The official narrative had divided the population into two halves: the virtuous ‘fully vaccinated’ (and now ‘boosted’) populations, and the selfish, evil ‘unvaccinated’ who are subhuman vectors of disease.

Leaving the irrationality of this narrative aside for a moment, here is a large dose of snobbery behind the demonisation of the ‘unvaccinated’. The reality is, people from poorer communities and racial minorities are much less likely to have taken the jabs than middle class white people.

Official government data is contested when it comes to how many people have actually taken the jabs. The government likes to cite a figure of 5m ‘unvaccinated’, making the uninjected quite a small minority. The Expose has used another government document to contest this, claiming this document shows that in fact 15.3m eligible people have not taken a single dose.

Even according to the more official data, however, take up is lower in poorer and ethnic minority communities. The website OpenSafely.org gives data on vaccine coverage in the UK (and is linked and used as a source by the BBC, so it’s establishment approved). Their charts clearly show that ethnic minorities and more deprived areas have a lower vaccination take up. Even if the numbers themselves are overshot per The Expose above, I doubt that the trends themselves are inaccurate.

The demonisation of the ‘unvaccinated’ thus has a clear class element.

There is also another aspect to this which we saw strongly during the Brexit argument and that is the ‘working class are stupid’ aspect. The Guardian published an article called ‘Understanding, not judgment, should shape our response to those who remain unjabbed’ which is full of the kind of talking down beloved of middle class British liberals.

By way of getting to the heart of it all, a PowerPoint presentation she sent me made mention of “historic lack of trust in public institutions including health services within some groups and communities”. In some black communities, she said, people’s relationships with authority are so poor that that some have chosen to be vaccinated well away from where they live and work, “because they’re almost embarrassed to be vaccinated, thinking their community isn’t behind them.” She paused. “There’s no easy fix. We just keep on talking.”

The implication of this article is that we need some nice middle class liberals to go and talk to these ‘stupid’ black people who don’t trust authority. There’s no consideration here that people may have actually said no and mean no and have the agency to do so.

This is the flipside to the demonisation of the ‘unvaccinated’ as subhuman – they can either be maliciously subhuman, in that they are purposeful granny killers, or they can be stupidly subhuman, in that they require enlightenment by the evangelists of the Covid Cult.

Alongside this narrative, the traditional ‘working class activity’ snobbery continued, with people attending the Euro 2020(1) football tournament being demonised for their attendance. Meanwhile, Wimbledon – of more middle class interest happening at the same time – did not cause the same demonisation from the middle class dominated media.

The Covid Scam Is An Attack on Working People

There is a more serious point to all of this snobbery, which is that the Covid narrative is an attack on ordinary working people in a multitude of ways. This attack is justified through this snobbery in the minds of the petty middle class, who are already inclined to view the working class as ignorant Brexit voters who ruined their nice holidays in Marbella.

Lockdown is a war on the working class. Firstly, it is an attack on the rights of the working class to congregate and organise politically in order to represent their interests, as well as to protest against the governments and corporations imposing poor working conditions and wages on them.

Lockdown is also an economic war against the working class and a massive transfer of wealth upwards from ordinary people. Multiple sources have highlighted this massive growth in wealth, including many that are supporters of the Official Covid Narrative. According to inequality.org:

The world’s billionaires have seen their wealth surge by over $5.5 trillion since the beginning of the pandemic in March 2020, a gain of over 68 percent. The world’s 2,690 global billionaires saw their combined wealth rise from $8 trillion on March 20, 2020 to $13.5 trillion as of July 31, 2021, drawing on data from Forbes.

Global billionaire total wealth has increased more over the past 17 months of the pandemic than it did in the 15 years prior to the pandemic. Between 2006 and 2020, global billionaire wealth increased from $2.65 trillion to $8 trillion, a gain of $5.35 trillion.

Whereas Oxfam reports:

With unprecedented support from governments for their economies, the stock market has been booming, driving up billionaire wealth, even while the real economy faces the deepest recession in a century. In contrast, after the financial crisis in 2008, it took five years for billionaire wealth to return to its pre-crisis highs.

Worldwide, billionaires’ wealth increased by a staggering $3.9tn (trillion)
between 18 March and 31 December 2020.28 Their total wealth now stands
at $11.95tn, which is equivalent to what G20 governments have spent
in response to the pandemic. The world’s 10 richest billionaires have
collectively seen their wealth increase by $540bn over this period.

Working class wealth has nosedived due to the lockdowns. Workers have been forced to work from home and this has increased their exploitation according to Ted Reese:

Much of the workplace has been moved to the home, saving capital costs on office space; pushing running costs such as electricity and water bills onto workers; and making them work longer hours, all combining to deepen the rate of their exploitation. About 30% of remote workers in a UK survey said they were working more unpaid hours than before lockdown, with 18% reporting at least four additional unpaid hours a week. According to an ADP Research Institute study, employees globally are now working 9.2 hours per week of unpaid overtime on average, up from 7.3 hours in a year.

The terrible inflation we are currently observing – at least partially caused by the lockdowns – is another aspect of war on the working class. The middle classes can weather this inflation through higher wages and the money they accrued while getting paid free cash on furlough. This isn’t an option for the working class.

The mandatory Covid injections implemented by the establishment are also an attack on the bodily integrity of the working class. The government forced care home workers to take these injections or they would be fired. Care home workers are poorly paid members of the working class, with an average wage of £8.50 an hour. They are also primarily women. Care home workers were fired from their jobs for not taking these injections in December 2021, or were forced to leave and find other work. Although the mandate was later repealed the damage was done in terms of lost wages and jobs. Other countries are still implementing such policies.

Snobbery also allows for the demonisation of resistance to the authoritarian project launched in the name of ‘fighting Covid’. This has been seen most notably in the case of the ‘Freedom Convoy’. The Convoy emerged in Canada in response to Justin Trudeau’s particularly authoritarian Covid measures. In response other convoys have taken inspiration for their own movements including in the UK. Due to the fact that this movement is founded by working class people, it has been demonised by people in the media and their woke left allies. The movement has been smeared as ‘white supremacist’ (despite the clear participation of people of all races).

The portion of the left that hates the working classes has also been brought in to smear the convoys as ‘right wing’. One example is previously respected anti-imperialist commentator Ben Norton, who has been demonising people opposed to the injection mandates:

The same line is being parroted by the liberal media that the likes of Norton claim to oppose. The Conversation ran a hit piece on the truckers, claiming that because they aren’t virtue signalling about ‘transphobia’ they don’t care about freedom and that they want the freedom to kill people because they reject mandating an experimental injection. This demonisation helps to keep the middle classes in the Covid propaganda bubble.

Conclusion

One function of lockdowns was a massive transfer of wealth to the rich from the poor and working class. The political acceptability of such a project – in the UK in particular – was maintained through the demonisation of the working classes.

What’s Going on in Ukraine? Part 3: The Corona Connection (I)

Introduction

The first two posts in these series discussed the current situation in Ukraine from the point of view of geopolitics and an anti-imperialist critique of Western actions. However, while the points made in those posts were based on factual evidence, there is one point that hasn’t been discussed so far. That is the fact that this Ukraine narrative swooped in and almost completely eclipsed the Corona nonsense that we have been dealing with for the past 2 years. This part will discuss the reality of Russia, Covid 19 and the Sputnik V ‘Vaccine’.

The Reality of Russia and Covid

In order to begin looking at this question, we need to start with Putin’s views on Corona and what policy positions he took during the ‘deadly pandemic’. Unfortunately it remains a fact that the Russian government supported the ‘deadly pandemic’ narrative. Here are some examples of the Russian policies towards Covid 19.

Russia used lockdowns as a means to ‘control the virus’ during the ‘first wave’ of Covid 19. These lockdowns – as well as a ban on foreign travelers to Russia – began to be introduced near the end of March 2020. This legislation, signed in April 2020 by Vladimir Putin, outlines fines of 300,000 to 700,000 roubles as a punishment for spreading false information regarding the situation regarding Covid 19. Violating quarantine is also a criminal offense according to this law if people become ill with Covid 19 due to the breach and can be punished with prison time.

Furthermore, Moscow introduced a ‘pass system’ for travel in April 2020, a draconian move that fits in well with later measures such as vaccine passports:

On April 11 [2020], Mayor Sergei Sobyanin signed a decree, introducing special digital passes to travel around Moscow and the Moscow Region using personal or public transport. This measure was imposed to curb the spread of coronavirus as much as possible.

TASS

The Russian lockdown did not last as long as in some other countries. There were also fewer lockdowns there than elsewhere but there was another regional lockdown in Moscow as late as October 2021, demonstrating that Russia has not given up on that policy position. This regional lockdown disputes any argument that Russia did a lockdown because it was ‘duped’ by other actors.

The Sputnik ‘Vaccine’, Vax Passports and Forced Jabs

As well as promoting a large number of Corona policy positions, Russia also developed their own ‘vaccine’ against Corona. According to the Sputnik Vaccine website:

Sputnik V is the world’s first registered vaccine based on a well-studied human adenovirus vector platform [similar to the Oxford/AstraZenena jab developed in the UK]. It has been approved for use in 71 countries with a total population of 4 billion people.

The vaccine’s efficacy is 97.6%, based on the analysis of data on the incidence of coronavirus among Russians vaccinated with both vaccine components between December 5, 2020 and March 31, 2021.

There hasn’t been a large amount of discussion about the Sputnik V ‘vaccine’ in the West. Most criticism of these jabs has focused on the Pfizer, followed by the Moderna, AstraZeneca and Janssen.

It would be off topic to perform a detailed analysis of the harms of the Sputnik V injections, and the lack of discussion and information coming out of Russia on these jabs makes it difficult to assess. Given the similarity between the Sputnik V and AstraZeneca, which has been admitted to cause blood clots (among other things), we cannot assume it is safe.

There are in fact some hints about the dangers of these Russian jabs. Mark Crispin Miller has been doing a series over the past couple of months where he documents people who ‘died suddenly’ with no cause of death or a cause in line with proven jab side effects. He also compiled one of these for Russia:

Those of us who’ve noticed the appalling toll of those “vaccines” worldwide have naturally been hoping that the jabs administered in Russia (and in China) aren’t so dangerous; but that’s evidently wishful thinking. Since Russia has no public database, like VAERS, we must rely on Russian press reports of “sudden deaths,” most of them with no cause noted, while two were due to strokes, and one to (what else?) COVID.

Riley Waggaman has also examined the risk of the Sputnik V injections as one of the few commentators to analyse Russia during the current Covid madness. He pointed out that the makers of the Sputnik jab were cooperating with Big Pharma entities such as Pfizer. He adds that there have been large numbers of safety signals indicating that Sputnik is not safe:

Data from other nations using Sputnik V suggests that while the drug is not the most dangerous COVID shot on the market, it’s still far from harmless.

A recent article that reviewed the adverse event tracking systems from Argentina, Mexico, Paraguay and the Philippines concluded that, in terms of the frequency of mild and severe side effects, Sputnik V is comparable to foreign vaccines.

Russians seem much more sceptical of the Covid jabs than in many other countries. The Our World in Data website indicates that as of April 23 2022 the Russian population is only 50% ‘fully vaccinated’. Furthermore take up rates were initially extremely slow. By May 2021, the amount of Russians that had taken at least one dose of a Corona ‘vaccine’ was only 9.52% of Russia’s population. (Compare this to high take-up in England for example where over half of the population had taken at least one jab by the end of May). A poll from Levada Center on ‘Vaccination’, printed on the 9th August 2021, showed a ‘vaccination’ rate for Russians of 24% in their sample. However, their polling over time shows a consistent 55% of the Russian population who have not taken the jabs and do not have any plans to take them (another 19% in this poll stated that they were planning on getting the injections).

In order to increase uptake among the population, the Russian government has used a wide range of strategies, many of which are coercive. In the above article on Russian jab take-up, the Mayor of Moscow, Sobyanin, complains that the measures taken to encourage Russians to get jabbed are failing:

What’s more, we are vaccinating in polyclinics, in shopping centres we are vaccinating, now in parks we are vaccinating, now even 1 thousand roubles will be paid to pensioners, in order that they can go shopping, only if they will be vaccinated – but there is no one.

Sergei Sobyanin, Mayor of Moscow

In response to the weak take up, the government applied coercive pressure, forcing service sector workers to get jabbed. Moscow Times reports the following back in June 2021:

Moscow has rolled out one of the world’s most ambitious mandatory vaccination schemes, requiring 60% of all service sector workers — more than 2 million people — in the capital to be fully vaccinated within the next seven weeks. [..]

Several other Russian regions have followed suit and announced similar mandatory vaccination rules for service sector workers and civil servants. 

Businesses in the service sector must ensure 60% of their customer-facing staff get vaccinated with one of the four coronavirus vaccines approved for use in Russia. At least 60% must have received a first dose by July 15, and the same proportion must be fully vaccinated by Aug. 15.

Moscow Times

Furthermore, vaccine passports have been in operation in many Russian regions. The official St. Petersburg administration website gives an outline:

From November [2021] a new system will be introduced for residents and guests of the city. This is because of the seasonal rise in the quantity of people made ill by coronavirus infection. What kind of documents will be present? QR Code on previous infection (period of use – 6 months), QR Code on Vaccination (period of use – 1 year), medical exemption (for those who cannot be vaccinated). It will be necessary for you to have your passport!

On top of coercion, the Russian government has been involved in demonisation of those who are sceptical of the jabs.

Using such measures, the Russian government has been able to increase uptake, with another more recent Levada Centre poll showing that now only 36% of Russians have no plans to take the jabs [as this number was consistently above 50% before the above coercive measures were applied, it is a reasonable extrapolation to assume some of the 55% in previous polls were coerced into the jabs].

A Spoke in the Pro-Russia Narrative

Some commentators on the current Ukraine issue have offered a more pro-Russian narrative, in line with what Putin offered himself as an explanation for his actions (combating NATO aggression and protecting the people of Donbass – see Part 2). Certainly, as previously examined, this pro-Russia narrative is much closer to the truth than the pro-Western narrative, which holds that Putin invaded Ukraine because he is a madman bent on bringing back the Soviet Union.

However, the fact that the Russian state is willing to impose things like lockdowns and ‘vaccine’ passports on its population, as well as promoting and distributing a clearly unsafe injection to millions of Russians means that the Russian state and Putin are not benign actors.

Part 4 (hopefully the final part) will discuss the interconnections between Covid and Ukraine.

Cost of Living Protest Birmingham 12th February 2022

This was a protest organised by the usual suspects on the left, who to be honest I find generally tiresome at this point. This included the unions – Unite and the National Education Union – and the People’s Assembly. In other words, the lockdown fanatics that advocated for the situation we now find ourselves in regarding the economy – and those who mocked people like me for pointing out the devastation that lockdown would inflict on working people.

People’s Assembly even went so far as to refuse to protest alongside ‘anti-vaxxers’ against the draconian Policing Bill:

They later deleted this because of the backlash but here it is for posterity. As you can see it is a ratio’d tweet.

I primarily went to the protest in order to provide coverage of the event, rather than to take part. I have lost faith in the traditional and modern left to do anything useful due to their Corona fanaticism, advocacy for working class destroying lockdowns, harmful and useless (in terms of stopping viruses) face masks, and mocking and smearing anyone who even questions a dodgy Big Pharma product as an ‘anti-vaxxer’.

The framing that was present during the speeches is exactly what you would expect regarding Corona, complaining about the old staples such as ‘useless PPE’, ‘dodgy contracts’ etc., which does not get to the heart of the matter. The oblique framing of the ‘the Tories making us pay for the pandemic’ was present, but no mention of the horrific consequences of locking down and how it has harmed working class people. (The only speaker to use the word ‘lockdown’ was Nila from Stop the War coalition, from what I heard, which was not all of it due to wind noise).

Then we get the typical complaining about left wing bugbears such as Tommy Robinson (I believe he is only highlighting grooming gang victims to push a particular narrative, but the left has failed on this issue, see below), ‘The Tory government’ (as if Labour wouldn’t do the same thing), Brexit (as if this topic has any relevance to anything at this point and I say this as a Brexit/Lexit voter), etc. Though one of the speakers did call out Prince Andrew for being a pedophile and the royal family for protecting him, so maybe common sense hasn’t completely left the building.

I don’t want working class people to have to pay more money for energy bills etc., especially since they were the primary victims of lockdowns. I think that is fairly obvious. The question is how we tackle the problem. In general, even though I disagree with capitalist economics I have become a lot more sceptical of calling on the (capitalist) state to do anything about anything, since they will just use it to push more pain onto working people (a good example is the environment: while it’s clear that many things humans are doing are negatively affecting the environment, any state action is likely to be more authoritarian nonsense that will punish the working class like carbon based digital IDs). Unlike libertarians I believe that this authoritarianism is inherently interlinked with the capitalist system.

Alternative systems within the current one such as opting out as much as possible and doing other things within the freedom based community are a good idea. However, they are difficult to implement in practice given that people still have to survive within the current system (e.g. people have to go to work full time, leaving limited time and energy for alternatives). Such suggestions can come across as a bit naïve in some cases though I advocate them where realistically possible.

I have uploaded some of the footage onto my Bitchute channel of the speeches that were audible and not ruined by wind noise.

RE Tommy Robinson: Robinson wants to promote the idea that foreign or Muslim men are inherently a threat to women and girls, which is false (even though I do believe Islamic ideology to be misogynistic, it does not follow that all men from these backgrounds will rape children). However the left has ignored the grooming gang victims because they were victims of Asian men and that does not fit their own narrative of foreign/Muslim men not being a threat to women and girls. In reality a minority of men of all races are a violent threat to women and girls (which is one reason why we have separate spaces for women and men). Robinson ignores victims of white men, whereas the misogyny of the current left causes them to brush over the problem. The left also allows for more abuse of women and girls to take place by pushing transgender ideology, which states that any man is a woman if he declares himself to be so (including violent males). The women from Stand up to Racism claimed that their slogan involved justice for the victims, I wasn’t there so I can’t say, but there is no evidence of that in the signage.